EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 403 (2024) MATEC Web Conf., 403 (2024) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2024
SUBLime Conference 2024 – Towards the Next Generation of Sustainable Masonry Systems: Mortars, Renders, Plasters and Other Challenges
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 24
Section Keynotes
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440301003
Published online 16 September 2024
  1. K.H. Hnaihen, The Appearance of Bricks in Ancient Mesopotamia. Athens Journal of History. 6, (1), (2020), pp. 73-96. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajhis.6-1-4. [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Delougaz, SAOC&. Plano-Convex Bricks and the Methods of their Employment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, (1933), 57p. [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Rashid, Brick production in Ancient Iraq [in Arabic]. Oil and Development, Development in Iraq for Centuries, 87 (1981), pp.33-46. [Google Scholar]
  4. P.B. Lourenço, Masonry Structures, Overview. Encyclopaedia of Earthquake Engineering. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014, pp.1-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_111-1. [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Fletcher, D. Cruikshank, Sir Banister Fletcher’s history of architecture: centenary edition. (20th Edition), Routledge Publisher, Taylor & Francis Group, Oxford. (1996), 1932p. ISBN 0750622679. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Heyman, (1997) The stone skeleton: structural engineering of masonry architecture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1997), 172p., ISBN 0521629632. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vitruvius, Ten books on Architecture. Edited by Ingrid D. Rowland & Thomas Noble Howe. Cambridge University Pr. (2001), 352 p. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Davidowits, Why the Pharaons built the Pyramids with fake stones. Institut Geopolymere, France, (2017), 277p., ISBN 9782951482043. [Google Scholar]
  9. D.D. Klemm, R. Klemm, The archeological map of Gebel el Silsila. 2nd International Congress of Egyptologists, Grenoble, (1979), Session 05. [Google Scholar]
  10. L.C. Nevett, House and Society in the Ancient Greek World, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, (2001), 236 p., ISBN 0521000254. [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Gőnül, Main topics and discussion on ancient Greek houses of West Anatolia. Structural Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture XII, WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 118, WIT Press, (2011), pp.61-72. https://doi.org/10.2495/STR110061 . [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Vintzileou (2008) The effect of timber ties on the behaviour of historic masonry. ASCE, Jour. of Struct. Engineering, 134 (6), pp.961–972. [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Vintzileou. Timber-reinforced structures in Greece: 2500 BC-1900AD. Proc. of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Struct. and Build., 164 (SB3), (2011), pp.167–180, https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.9.00085 . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Enclose masonry Wall Systems Worldwide. Ed. S. Pompeu Santos. Balkema Publishing, Taylor & Francis Group, (2007). 214 p. [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Kutlosoy, M.M.Maras, E. Ekinci, B. Rihavi, Production parameters of novel geopolymer masonry mortar in heritage buildings: Application in masonry building elements, Jour. of Build. Engng 76, (2023) 107038, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107038. [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Venugopal, J. Raju Radhakrishna, M.A. Dar, Properties of application of geopolymer masonry units, SSRG Int. Jour. of Civil Engineering (SSRG-IJCE) – EFES, (2015), pp.117-119, ISSN 2348-8352. [B] J. Thamboo, T. Zahra, S. Navaratnam, M. Asad, K. Poologanathan, Prospects of developming prefabricated masonry walling systems in Australia, Buildings, 11 (294), (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11070294 . [Google Scholar]
  17. Technical Notes 40 – Prefabricated Brick Masonry – Introduction. Technical Notes on Brick Construction, Brick Industry Associations, Reston VA, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Thamboo, T. Zahra, S. Navaratnam, M. Asad, K. Poologanathan, Prospects of developming prefabricated masonry walling systems in Australia, Buildings, 11 (294), (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11070294 . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Wilfinger, U. Knaack, Ziegel aus dem 3D-Drucker, Mauerwerk Kalender 2021, Erns & Sohn Verlag, Berlin, (2021), pp.221-137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Brehm, Ch. Wurll, Mauerwerksroboter für die baustelle – internationaler Stand, Mauerwerk Kalender 2021, Erns & Sohn Verlag, Berlin, (2021), pp.241-248. [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Sandy, M. Giftthaler, K. Dőrfler, M. Kohler, J. Buchli, Autonomous Repositioning and Localization of an In Situ Fabricator, Proc. of International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Stockholm, Sweden, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Bitting, T. Derme, J. Lee, T. Van Mele, B. Dillenburger, P. Block, Challenges and opportunities in scaling up architectural applications of mycelium-based materials with digital fabrication. Biomimetics, 7, (2), (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7020044. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. M.E. Antinori, L. Ceseracciu, G. Mancini, J. Heredia-Guerrero, A. Athanassiou. Fine-tuning of physicochemical properties and growth dynamics of mycelium-based materials. ACS Applied Bio Materials, XXXX, 01, (2020), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b01031. [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Appels, J. Dijksterhuis, C. Lukasiewicz, K. M. B. Jansen, H. Wosten, P. Krijgsheld. Hydrophobin gene deletion and environmental growth conditions impact mechanical properties of mycelium by affecting the density of the material. Scientific Reports, 8, 03, (2018), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23171-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.