EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 396 (2024) MATEC Web Conf., 396 (2024) 05013 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 396, 2024
8th World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering - Architecture - Urban Planning Symposium (WMCAUS 2023)
Article Number 05013
Number of page(s) 11
Section Structural Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439605013
Published online 24 May 2024
  1. ASTM E965, Standard Test Method for Measuring Pavement Macrotexture Depth Using a Volumetric Technique, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/e0965-15r24 [Google Scholar]
  2. EN 13036-1, Road and airfield surface characteristics - Test methods - Part 1: Measurement of pavement surface macrotexture depth using a volumetric patch technique [Google Scholar]
  3. ISO 13473, Parts 1 - 6, Characterization of pavement texture by use of surface profiles [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Gottaut and L. Goubert, “ROSANNE D4.2 Texture-based descriptors for road surface properties and how they can be used in the appropriate standards”, Project Report, 2017, see www.rosanne-project.eu [Google Scholar]
  5. https://www.arrb.com.au/walking-profiler-g3 last consulted on 5 May 2023 [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Li, J. Buscheck, J. Harvey, D. Fitch, D. Reger, R. Wu, R. Ketchell, J. Hernandez, B. Haynes and C. Thigpen, “Development of recommended guidelines for preservation treatments for bicycle routes.” Pavement Research Center (PRC) (UCPRC Research Report, 2016-02) (2017). Available online at http://www.ucprc.ucdavis.edu/PDF/UCPRC-RR-2016-02.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  7. https://www.thetranstecgroup.com/pavement-engineers-release-updated-robotic-pavement-texture-profiler and http://www.extranet.vdot.state.va.us/locdes/environmental9-10-19/tuesday/rasmussen-texturenoise-ver1.pdf last consulted on 5 May 2023 [Google Scholar]
  8. https://www.ait.ac.at/en/solutions/acoustics-and-noise-abatement/3d-road-texture-scanner last consulted on 5 May 2023 [Google Scholar]
  9. J. L. Vilaça, J. C. Fonseca, A.C.M. Pinho and E. Freitas, “3D surface profile equipment for the characterization of the pavement texture - TexScan”, in Mechatronics, vol. 20, Issue 6 (2010), 674–685, ISSN 0957-4158, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.07.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Lou, J.J. Lu, S. Chen and H. Lang, “A portable measurement system for pavement surface macrotexture - a case study in China”, in Intl. J. Pavement Engineering, 23:12, (2022) 4136–4148, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2021.1935939 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. EN 13036-4, Road and airfield surface characteristics - Test methods - Part 4: Method for measurement ofslip/skid resistance of a surface: The pendulum test [Google Scholar]
  12. W.-R. Chang, Th.K. Courtney, R. Grongvist and M. Redfern (Eds.), Measuring Slipperiness - Human Locomotion and Surface Factors, Taylor and Francis, London (2001) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Niska, G. Blomqvist and M. Hjort, “Cykelvägars friktion: Mätningar i fält i jämförelse med cykeldäcks friktion på olika underlag i VTI:s däckprovningsanläggning [The skid resistance of cycleways: Measurements on cycleways in comparison with the friction of bicycle tyres on different types of road conditions in VTI's tyre testing facility]”. (Swedish Council for Building Research), VTI Rapport 993 (2018) Available online at https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1700743/FULLTEXT01.pdf [Google Scholar]
  14. https://www.sarsys-asft.com/t2go last consulted on 5 May 2023 [Google Scholar]
  15. www.griptester.us last consulted on 5 May 2023 [Google Scholar]
  16. CEN/TS 16165:2021, Determination of slip resistance of pedestrian surfaces -Methods of evaluation [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Hjort, “Vinterdäck till cykel: Ett jämförande test [Winter tyres for bicycles: A comparative test]”. (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute) VTI Notat, 20-2018. Available online at https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1256908/FULLTEXT02. [Google Scholar]
  18. K.-P. Rekilä and A. Klein-Paste, “Measuring bicycle braking friction in winter conditions.” in Cold regions science and technology 125 pp.108–116 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2016.02.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Dahl Fenre and A. Klein-Paste, “Bicycle rolling resistance under winter conditions.” in Cold regions science and technology 187, Article 103282 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103282. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Dahl Fenre and A. Klein-Paste, “Rolling resistance measurements on cycleways using an instrumented bicycle.” in Journal of cold regions engineering 35 (2), Article 04021001 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cr.1943-5495.0000244. [Google Scholar]
  21. A.C. Lim, E.P. Homestead, A.G. Edwards, T.C. Carver, R. Kram, W.C. Byrnes, “Measuring changes in aerodynamic/rolling resistances by cycle-mounted power meters.” in Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 43 (5), 853–860 (2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181fcb140. [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Meyer, G. Kloss and V. Senner. “What is slowing me down? Estimation of rolling resistances during cycling.” in Procedia Eng. 147: 526–531 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.232. [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Maier, B. Müller, L. Schmid, T. Steiner, J.P. Wehrlin, “Reliability of the virtual elevation method to evaluate rolling resistance of different mountain bike crosscountry tyres.” in J Sports Sci., vol. 36, no. 2 (Feb. 2017) pp. 156–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1287935. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. B. Candau, F. Grappe, M. Menard, B. Barbier, G.Y. Millet, M.D. Hoffman, A.R. Belli, and J.D. Rouillon, “Simplified deceleration method for assessment of resistive forces in cycling.” in Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 31 (10): 1441 (1999). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199910000-00013. [Google Scholar]
  25. F. Grappe, R. Candau, B. Barbier, M.D. Hoffman, A. Belli, and J.D. Rouillon, “Influence of tyre pressure and vertical load on coefficient of rolling resistance and simulated cycling performance.” in Ergonomics 42 (10): 1361–1371 (1999). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Steyn, and J. Warnich, “Comparison of tyre rolling resistance for different mountain bike tyre diameters and surface conditions.” in South African J. for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation 36.2 (2014): 179–193. [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Tengattini, and A. Bigazzi, “Validation of an outdoor coast-down test to measure bicycle resistance parameters.” in J. Transp. Eng., Part A: Syst. 144 (7): 04018031 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000152. [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Tengattini, and A.Y. Bigazzi,“Physical characteristics and resistance parameters of typical urban cyclists.” in J. of sports sciences 36 (20), pp. 2383–2391 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1458587. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Debraux, F. Grappe, A.V. Manolova, and W. Bertucci, “Aerodynamic drag in cycling: Methods of assessment.” in Sports biomechanics 10 (3), pp. 197–218 (2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2011.592209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. C. Capelli, G. Rosa, F. Butti, G. Ferretti, and A. Veicsteinas, “Energy cost and efficiency of riding aerodynamics bicycles.” in Eur. J. ofApplied Physiology, 67, 144–149 (1993). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00376658. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. D.G. Wilson, Bicycling Science. (The MIT Press, 2004). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1601.001.0001. [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Bergiers, J. Ejsmont, J. Maeck and M. Zöller, “Draft standard for a trailer-based RR measurement method including robust calibration procedures”, ROSANNE, WP3, project deliverable D3.5 (16 September 2017), available on http://rosanne-proiect.eu/ (last consulted on 5 May 2023) [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Bergiers and J. Maeck, “Status-quo and Outlook for Rolling Resistance in Europe”, in Proc. 8th Symp. Pavement Surface Characteristics (SURF2018), PIARC, Brisbane, Australia (2-4 May 2018) [Google Scholar]
  34. D.B. Prescott and E. Coleri, “Measuring, Managing, and Reducing Pavement Macrotexture and Roughness to Improve Cyclists’ Safety and Ride Quality.” Final Project Report. Report Number 2021-S-OSU-3, 2023-04-01 (Publ.: Pacific Northwest Transportation Consortium PacTrans, UTC), available online at: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/67583. [Google Scholar]
  35. M. R. Wigan and P. T. Cairney, “Road and track roughness factors for bicycle usage”, Australian Road Research Board Research Report (1985) ISSN: 0158-0728 [Google Scholar]
  36. C. Van Geem and T. Massart, “Comfort Evaluation of New Bicycle Paths with a Laser Profilometer: 15 Years of Experience in Belgium”, in Proc. 8th World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium (WMCAUS), Prague (2023) [Google Scholar]
  37. T. Massart and C. Van Geem, “Laser profiler for the evaluation of longitudinal evenness of new bicycle paths”, presentation at ERPUG, Prague (2016) [Google Scholar]
  38. A. Niska, L. Sjögren and M. Gustafsson, “Jämnhetsmätning på cykelvägar: utveckling och test av metod för att bedöma cyklisters åkkvalitet baserat på cykelvägens längsprofil.” (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute) VTI Rapport 699 (2011), ISSN: 0347-6030 [Google Scholar]
  39. A. Niska, “Measuring the surface evenness of cycle paths.” (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute) (2012). Available online at https://www.vianordica.is/assets/342 [Google Scholar]
  40. US Department of Transportation, LTPP Manual for Collecting and Processing Longitudinal Profile, Macrotexture, and Transverse Profile Data, Publ. No.: FHWA-HRT-21-096, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21949/1521680. [Google Scholar]
  41. G.M. Arguelles, L.G. Fuentes and L.M. Torregroza Aldana, “Review of the pavement management system of the Bogotá bike-path network” in Revista Ingeniería de Construcción, vol. 26, no. 2, (August 2011) pp:150–170. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50732011000200002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. N. Gharaibeh, C. Wilson, M. Darter and G. Jones, “Development of a Bike Path Management System for the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.” in Transportation Research Record, 1636(1), 56–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1636-09. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. R. Sobotta, J. Deing and B. Glahe, “Zustandserfassung und Dringlichkeitsreihung von Unterhaltungsmassnahmen fuer das Radwegenetz der Stadt Nordhorn” in Strasse und Autobahn 56-3 (2005). ISSN: 0039-2162 [Google Scholar]
  44. R. Anger and A. Schniering, “Condition Assessment on Cycle Paths with a Newly Developed Measuring Technology”, in Proc. Eur. Pavement and Asset Management Conf. (EPAM 3), Coimbra, Portugal (2008). [Google Scholar]
  45. F.M. El Said, “Road Management Systems to Support Bicycling: A Case Study of Montreal’s Bike Network”, PhD Thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (June 2018). [Google Scholar]
  46. I. Bohé, J. Gardeyn, L. Cuypers, J. Lapon, M. Willocx and V. Naessens, “A Crowdsensing Solution for Tracking Bicycle Path Conditions,” at 2020 IEEE 6th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), New Orleans, LA, USA (2020) pp. 1–6, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WF-IoT48130.2020.9221195. [Google Scholar]
  47. M. Knuuti, K. Sirvio, V. Männistö and S. Suomela, “Road Asset Management with a Mobile Game and Artificial Intelligence” in Proc. 9th Symp. on Pavement Surface Characteristics (SURF 2022), Milano, Italy (2022). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003429258-19. [Google Scholar]
  48. J. Luo, G. Wu, Z. Wei, K. Boriboonsomsin and M. Barth, “Developing an AerialImage-Based Approach for Creating Digital Sidewalk Inventories” in Transportation Research Record: J. of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2673, no. 8 (Apr. 2019) pp. 499–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119842820. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. https://www.leipzig.de/bauen-und-wohnen/bauen/geodaten-und-karten/strassenbefahrung last consulted on 5 May 2023 [Google Scholar]
  50. J. Huang, N. Fournier and A. Skabardonis, “Bicycle Level of Service: Proposed Updated Pavement Quality Index”, in Transportation Research Record: J. of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2675, no. 11 (July 2021) pp. 1346–1356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211026661. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. M. Okabe, K. Takahashi, K. Tomiyama and T. Hagiwara, “Examination of Road Surface Management Method Based on Vibration Ride Quality of Bicycle using Bicycle Ride Index” in J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. E1 (Pavement Engineering), vol. 76, no. 2 (2020) pp. I_187–I_194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejpe.76.2i187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. M. Ambros and G. Tremblay, “Guide de gestion de l’entretien des voies cyclables” (Centre d’expertise et de recherche en infrastructures urbaines CERIU, Quebec, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  53. Federal Highway Administration, “University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation, Lesson 16: Bicycle Facility Maintenance”, July 2006, Publication No. FHWA-HRT-05-115 [Google Scholar]
  54. M. Briessinck (Ed.), “State of the Art in Monitoring Road and Road/Vehicle Interaction”, PIARC publication 2019R14EN, ISBN: 978-2-84060-530-0 (World Road Association, La Defense, France, 2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.