EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 394 (2024) MATEC Web Conf., 394 (2024) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 394, 2024
1st International Conference on Civil and Earthquake Engineering (ICCEE2023)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 8
Section Structures and Risks
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439403002
Published online 26 April 2024
  1. M. Angiolilli, S. Lagomarsino, S. Cattari, S. Degli Abbati, Seismic fragility assessment of existing masonry buildings in aggregate. Engineering Structures, 247, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Valente, G. Milani, E. Grande, A. Formisano, Historical masonry building aggregates: advanced numerical insight for an effective seismic assessment on two row housing compounds, Engineering Structures, 190, 360–379, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Greco, G. Lombardo, B. Pantò, A. Famà, Seismic vulnerability of historical masonry aggregate buildings in Oriental Sicily, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 14:4, 514–540, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Formisano, A. Massimilla, A novel procedure for simpliefied nonlinear numerical modeling of structural units in masonry aggregates, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 11:7-8, 1162–1170, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Mosoarca, I. Onescu, E. Onescu, B. Azap, N. Chieffo, M. Szitar-Sirbu, Seismic vulnerability assessment for the historical areas of the Timisoara city, Romania. Engineering Failure Analysis, 101, 86–112, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Giordano, F. Clementi, A. Nespeca, S. Lenci, Damage assessment by numerical modeling of Sant’Agostino sanctuary in Offida during the Central Italy 2016-2017 seismic sequence. Frontiers in Built Environment, 4:87, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Clementi, A. Ferrante, E. Giordano, F. Dubois, S. Lenci, Damage assessment of ancient masonry churches stroked by the Central Italy earthquakes of 206 by the non – smooth contact dynamics method. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18, 455–486, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Miano, D. de Silva, G. Chiumento, M.L. Capasso, Seismic and fire assessment and upgrading process for historical buildings: the case study of Palanno Colonna in Caggiano. Frontiers in Built Environment, 6, 22, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. PCM-DPC: Manual for the compilation of the form for the damage and post-seismic usability assessment for precast and large dimensions buildings (GL-AeDES), Rome (2014). [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Penna, S. Bracchi, C. Salvatori, C. Morandini, M. Rota, Extending analysis capabilities of equivalent frame models for masonry structures, European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (ECEES 2022), Bucharest, Romania, 4 – 9 September, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport. Technical Standards for Construction; Official Gazette (nr. 42 of 20-2-2018): Rome, Italy, 2018 (In Italian). [23] Ministerial Circular n.7/2019 (M. C., 02/01/2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. Instructions for the application of the “Upgrading of Technical Codes for Constructions” (M. D: 17/01/2018). Official Gazette of the Italian Republic published on 2019 January 2nd [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Davino, G. Longobardi, E. Meglio, A. Dallari, A. Formisano, Seismic energy upgrading of an existing brick masonry building by a cold-formed steel envelopre system. Buildings, 12, 11, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Longobardi, A. Formisano, Seismic vulnerability assessment and consolidation techniques of ancient masonry buildings: the case study of a Neapolitan Masseria. Engineering Failure Analysis, 138, 1, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Lagomarsino, S. Cattari, D. Ottonelli, The heuristic vulnerability model: fragility curves for masonry buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19:31, 29–63, 2021. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.