EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 392 (2024) MATEC Web Conf., 392 (2024) 01048 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 392, 2024
International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research and Sustainable Development (ICMED 2024)
Article Number 01048
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439201048
Published online 18 March 2024
  1. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information systems research, 9(2), 204-215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2017). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 99-110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey, D. R., Almusharraf, N., & Almusharraf, A. (2022). Video conferencing in the e-learning context: explaining learning outcome with the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7679-7698. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. BCG (2023). Fintech Projected to Become a $1.5 Trillion Industry by 2030, Retrieved from: https://www.bcg.com/press/3may2023-fintech-1-5-trillion-industry-by-2030 [Google Scholar]
  5. BFSI Network (2023). Fintech Industry to develop at 31% CAGR from 2021 to 2025.Retrieved from: https://bfsi.eletsonline.com/fintech-industry-to-develop-at-31-cagrfrom-2021-to-2025/#:~:text=India%20is%20home%20to%20over,to%202025%2C%20reaching%20%241.3%20trillion. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, L. G. (1989). The strategic and tactical implications of convenience in consumer product marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(3), 13-19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang, C. C., Yan, C. F., & Tseng, J. S. (2012). Perceived convenience in an extended technology acceptance model: Mobile technology and English learning for college students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5). [Google Scholar]
  8. Chavoshi, A., & Hamidi, H. (2019). Social, individual, technological and pedagogical factors influencing mobile learning acceptance in higher education: A case from Iran. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 133-165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of retailing, 77(4), 511-535. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chopdar, P. K., Korfiatis, N., Sivakumar, V. J., & Lytras, M. D. (2018). Mobile shopping apps adoption and perceived risks: A cross-country perspective utilizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 109-128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. [Google Scholar]
  12. Demir, A., Pesqué-Cela, V., Altunbas, Y., & Murinde, V. (2022). Fintech, financial inclusion and income inequality: a quantile regression approach. The European Journal of Finance, 28(1), 86-107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dutot, V., Bhatiasevi, V., & Bellallahom, N. (2019). Applying the technology acceptance model in a three-countries study of smartwatch adoption. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 30(1), 1-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1) [Google Scholar]
  15. Goswami, S., Sharma, R. B., & Chouhan, V. (2022). Impact of financial technology (Fintech) on financial inclusion (FI) in Rural India. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10(2), 483-497. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hair, J. F., Jr. , Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education International. [Google Scholar]
  17. Haqqi, F. R., & Suzianti, A. (2020, June). Exploring risk and benefit factors affecting user adoption intention of fintech in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering (pp. 13-18). [Google Scholar]
  18. Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Koshksaray, A. A., & Tabar, M. J. S. (2014). Mobilebanking adoption by Iranian bank clients. Telematics and informatics, 31(1), 62-78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. He, X., Zhan, W., & Hu, Y. (2018). Consumer purchase intention of electric vehicles in China: The roles of perception and personality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 1060-1069. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hsu, C.L. and Lu, H.P. (2004) ‘Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience’, Information & management, Vol. 41, No. 7, pp.853–868. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Huei, C. T., Cheng, L. S., Seong, L. C., Khin, A. A., & Bin, R. L. L. (2018). Preliminary study on consumer attitude towards fintech products and services in Malaysia. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.29), 166-169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kanga, D., Oughton, C., Harris, L., & Murinde, V. (2022). The diffusion of fintech, financial inclusion and income per capita. The European Journal of Finance, 28(1), 108-136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim, H. Y., Lee, J. Y., Mun, J. M., & Johnson, K. K. (2017). Consumer adoption of smart in-store technology: assessing the predictive value of attitude versus beliefs in the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 10(1), 26-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, J., Kim, J., & Choi, J. Y. (2019). The adoption of virtual reality devices: The technology acceptance model integrating enjoyment, social interaction, and strength of the social ties. Telematics and Informatics, 39, 37-48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C. S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The journal of strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245-268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International journal of information management, 34(1), 1-13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. MODEL, A. I. (2003). Trust and tam in online shopping: An integrated model1. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mombeuil, C., & Uhde, H. (2021). Relative convenience, relative advantage, perceived security, perceived privacy, and continuous use intention of China’s WeChat Pay: A mixed-method two-phase design study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nangin, M. A., Barus, I. R. G., & Wahyoedi, S. (2020). The effects of perceived ease of use, security, and promotion on trust and its implications on fintech adoption. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 5(2), 124-138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pham, Q. T., Tran, X. P., Misra, S., Maskeliūnas, R., & Damaševičius, R. (2018). Relationship between convenience, perceived value, and repurchase intention in online shopping in Vietnam. Sustainability, 10(1), 156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sa’diyah, C. (2021). Analysis of factors affecting adoption of financial technology application. Sentralisasi, 10(1), 57-70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Salampasis, D., & Mention, A. L. (2018). FinTech: Harnessing innovation for financial inclusion. In Handbook of Blockchain, Digital Finance, and Inclusion, Volume 2 (pp. 451-461). Academic Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shankar, A., & Rishi, B. (2020). Convenience matter in mobile banking adoption intention?. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(4), 273-285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shekhar Lele (2023). FinTech 2.0: A new era of financial inclusion. Retrieved from: https://www.pwc.in/industries/financial-services/fintech/fintech-insights/fintech-2-0-a-new-era-of-financial-inclusion.html [Google Scholar]
  38. Singh, N., Sinha, N., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2020). Determining factors in the adoption and recommendation of mobile wallet services in India: Analysis of the effect of innovativeness, stress to use and social influence. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 191-205. [Google Scholar]
  39. Singh, S., Sahni, M. M., & Kovid, R. K. (2020). What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model. Management Decision, 58(8), 1675-1697. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Slade, E. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Piercy, N. C., & Williams, M. D. (2015). Modeling consumers’ adoption intentions of remote mobile payments in the United Kingdom: extending UTAUT with innovativeness, risk, and trust. Psychology & marketing, 32(8), 860-873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Subramanian, G. H. (1994). A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement. Decision sciences, 25(5‐6), 863-874. [Google Scholar]
  42. Thakur, R., & Srivastava, M. (2014). Adoption readiness, personal innovativeness, perceived risk and usage intention across customer groups for mobile payment services in India. Internet Research, 24(3), 369-392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tun-Pin, C., Keng-Soon, W. C., Yen-San, Y., Pui-Yee, C., Hong-Leong, J. T., & Shwu-Shing, N. (2019). An adoption of fintech service in Malaysia. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, 18(5), 134-147. [Google Scholar]
  44. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, S. M., & Chuan‐Chuan Lin, J. (2011). The effect of social influence on bloggers’ usage intention. Online Information Review, 35(1), 50-65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wirani, Y., Randi, R., Romadhon, M. S., & Suhendi, S. (2022). The influence of familiarity and personal innovativeness on the acceptance of fintech lending services: A perspective from Indonesian borrowers. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 8(1), 81-93. [Google Scholar]
  47. Won-jun, L. (2018). Understanding counsumer acceptance of Fintech service: An extension of the TAM model to understand Bitcoin. IOSR journal of business and management, 20(7), 34-37. [Google Scholar]
  48. Xie, J., Ye, L., Huang, W., & Ye, M. (2021). Understanding FinTech platform adoption: impacts of perceived value and perceived risk. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 1893-1911. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang, L. L., & Kim, H. (2020). The influence of financial service characteristics on use intention through customer satisfaction with mobile fintech. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 10(2), 82-94. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zheng, J., & Li, S. (2020). What drives students’ intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101612. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.