EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 392 (2024) MATEC Web Conf., 392 (2024) 01023 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 392, 2024
International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research and Sustainable Development (ICMED 2024)
Article Number 01023
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439201023
Published online 18 March 2024
  1. Liu S, Wang Y, Muthuramalingam T. Effect of B4C and MOS2 reinforcement on micro structure and wear properties of aluminum hybrid composite for automotive applications. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2019;176(July):107329. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Seshappa, B. Anjaneya Prasad Characterization and Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Aluminium Hybrid Nano-composites: Novel Approach of Utilizing Silicon Carbide and Waste Particles to Reduce Cost of Material. ISSN Silicon, 1876-990X, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00748-z [Google Scholar]
  3. RAJMOHAN T, PALANIKUMAR K, RANGANATHAN S. ‘Evaluation of mechanical and wear properties of hybrid aluminium matrix composites. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2013;23(9):2509-2517. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sarada BN, Murthy PLS, Ugrasen G. Hardness and wear characteristics of hybrid aluminium metal matrix composites produced by stir casting technique. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2015;2(4-5):2878-2885. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sharma P, Sharma S, Khanduja D. Production and characterization of AA6082-(Si3N4 + Gr) stir cast hybrid composites. Part Sci Technol. 2017;35(2):158-165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hu Q, Zhao H, Ge J. Microstructure and mechanical properties of (B4C+Al3Ti)/Al hybrid composites fabricated by a two-step stir casting process. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016;650:478-482. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Balamurugan CBK. Fabrication and property evaluation of Al 6061 + x % (RHA + TiC) hybrid metal matrix composite. SN Appl Sci.1,977 2019 July. [Google Scholar]
  8. Alaneme KK, Akintunde IB, Olubambi PA, et al. Fabrication characteristics and mechanical behaviour of rice husk ash – alumina reinforced Al-Mg-Si alloy matrix hybrid composites. J Mater Res Technol. 2013;2(1):60-67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Alaneme KK, Sanusi KO. Microstructural characteristics, mechanical and wear behaviour of aluminium matrix hybrid composites reinforced with alumina, rice husk ash and graphite. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal. 2015;18 (3):416-422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pai A, Sharma SS, D’Silva RE, et al. Effect of graphite and granite dust particulates as micro-fillers on tribological performance of Al 6061-T6 hybrid composites. Tribology International. 2015;92:462-471. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kumar M, Murugan AM. Tribological characterization of Al6061/alumina/graphite/red– mud hybrid composite for brake rotor application. Part Sci Technol. 2017.37:3, 261-274 [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh J, CHAUHAN A. Fabrication characteristics and tensile strength of novel Al2024/SiC/ red mud composites processed via stir casting route. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2017;27(12):2573-2586. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ramanathan BVS, Selvakumar VAN. Fabrication and Characterization of Organic and In-Organic Reinforced A356 Aluminium Matrix Hybrid Composite by Improved Double-Stir. 2019;817-829.11, pages817-829. [Google Scholar]
  14. Verma N, Vettivel SC. Characterization and experimental analysis of boron carbide and rice husk ash reinforced AA7075 aluminium alloy hybrid composite. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2018;741:981-998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kumar KR, Pridhar T, Balaji VSS. Mechanical properties and characterization of zirconium oxide (ZrO2) and coconut shell ash(CSA) reinforced aluminium (Al 6082) matrix hybrid composite. J Alloys Compd. 2018.765; 171-179 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Arora G. A comparative study of AA6351 Mono-composites reinforced with synthetic and agro waste reinforcement. 2018;19(4):631-638. [Google Scholar]
  17. Singla M, Dwivedi DD, Singh L, et al. Development of aluminium based silicon carbide particulate metal matrix composite. J Mine Mater Charact Eng. 2015;8(6):455– 467. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dwivedi SP, Sharma S, Mishra RK. Characterization of Waste Eggshells and CaCO3 Reinforced AA2014 Green Metal Matrix Composites: a Green Approach in the Synthesis of Composites. 17. 2016;10:1383-1393. [Google Scholar]
  19. Subramanian S, Arunachalam B, Nallasivam K, et al. Investigations on tribo– mechanical behaviour of Al-Si10-Mg/sugarcane bagasse ash/SiC hybrid composites. Overseas Foundry. 16(4):0-7. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tile JM, Nyior GB, Sidi MS. Mechanical Properties of Al-Mg-Si/Groundnut shell particulate composite produced by stir casting method. Am J Eng Res. 2018;7(5):247–252. [Google Scholar]
  21. Singh L, Singh B, Saxena KK. Manufacturing techniques for metal matrix composites (MMC): an overview. Adv Mat Proc Technol. 2020;6(2):441-457. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pandiyarajan R, Maran P, Marimuthu S, et al. Investigation on mechanical properties of ZrO2, C and AA6061 metal matrix composites. Adv Mat Proc Technol. 2020;1-9.DOI:10.1080/2374068X.2020.1810946 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kumar VN, Nath NK, Babu PR. Effect of reinforcement and fabrication of Al6061 nanosilica composite prepared using single– and two-step methods. Adv Mat Proc Technol. 2020;1-20. DOI:10.1080/2374068X.2020.1815139 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar GBV, Gouda PSS,R,P, Chowdary USK, et al. Development and experimental evalua– tion of titanium diboride particulate reinforcements on the Al6061 alloy composites properties. Adv Mat Proc Technol. 2020;1-17. DOI:10.1080/2374068X.2020.1855399. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kumar A, Rana RS, Purohit R. Effect of stirrer design on microstructure of MWCNT and Al alloy by stir casting process. Adv Mat Proc Technol. 2020;6(2):320-327. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.