EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 388 (2023) MATEC Web Conf., 388 (2023) 05008 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
2023 RAPDASA-RobMech-PRASA-AMI Conference Advanced Manufacturing Beyond Borders - The 24th Annual International RAPDASA Conference joined by RobMech, PRASA and AMI, hosted by CSIR and CUT
Article Number 05008
Number of page(s) 8
Section Product Design and Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202338805008
Published online 15 December 2023
  1. D. F. Cannon, K. O. Edel, S.L, Grassie and K. Sawley, “Rail defects: an overview,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 865–886, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Lewis and U. Olofsson, “Basic tribology of the wheel-rail contact,” in Wheel-Rail Interface Handbook, Cambridge, Woodhead, 2009, pp. 34–57. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Kapoor, I. Salehi and A.M.S, Asih, “Rolling Contact Fatigue (RCF),” in Encyclopedia of Tribology, Boston, Springer, 2013, pp. 2736–2969. [Google Scholar]
  4. V. Manoj, K.M. , Shenoy and K. Gopinath, “Developmental studies on rolling contact fatigue test rig,” Wear, vol. 264, no. 7-8, p. 708–718, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. U. Olofsson and L. Roger, “Tribology of the Wheel-Rail Contact,” in Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics, Boca Raton, Florida, Tylor and Francis Group, 2006, pp. 121–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. F. Bower and K. L. Johnson, “Plastic flow and shakedown of the rail surface in repeated wheel-rail contact,” Wear, vol. 144, no. 1-2, pp. 1–18, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Zhong, J. J. Hu, P. Shen, C.Y. Wang and Q.Y. Lius, “Experimental investigation between rolling contact fatigue and wear of high-speed and heavy-haul railway and selection of rail material,” Wear, vol. 271, p. 2485–2493, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. International Trade Administration, “International Trade Administration,” International Trade Administration, 11 September 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/south-africa-rail-infrastructure. [Accessed 19 February 2023]. [Google Scholar]
  9. Association of American Railroads (AAR), “AAR M-107/M-208 Standard: AAR Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices: Wheels and Axles Wheels,” Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  10. British Standards Institution, “Standard for Railway applications. Track. Rail. Vignole railway rails 46 kg/m and above, BS EN 13674-1:2011,” British Standards Institution, London, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. P. Leso, C. W. Siyasiya, R.J., Mostert and J. Moema, “Study of rolling contact fatigue, rolling and sliding wear of class B wheel steels against R350HT and R260 rail steels under dry contact conditions using the twin disc setup,” Tribology International, vol. 174, pp. 1–14, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Timoshenko and J. N. Goodier, Theory of elasticity (second edition), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951. [Google Scholar]
  13. R. G. Budynas and J. K. Nisbett, Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, 9th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Lewis, R. S. Dwyer-Joyce, U. Olofsson, J. Pombo, J. Ambrósio, M. Pereira, C. Ariaudo and N. Kuka, “Mapping railway wheel material wear mechanisms and transitions,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 224, no. 3, pp. 125–137, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. F. S. Vicente and M. P. Guillamón, “Use of the fatigue index to study rolling contact wear,” Wear, Vols. 436-437, pp. 1–9, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  16. W. Zhang, J. Chen, X. Wu and X. Jin, “Wheel/rail adhesion and analysis by using full scale roller rig,” Wear, vol. 253, no. 1-2, pp. 82–88, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. W. J. Wang, S. R. Lewis, R. Lweis, A. Beagles, C.G. He and Q.Y. Liu, “The role of slip ratio in rolling contact fatigue of rail materials under wet conditions,” Wear, Vols. 376-377, Part B, p. 1892–1900, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Ma, C. G. He, X. J. Zhao, J. Guo, Y. Zhu, W. J. Wang, Q.Y. Liu and X.S. Jin, “Study on wear and rolling contact fatigue behaviors of wheel/rail materials under different slip ratio conditions,” Wear, Vols. 366-367, pp. 13–26, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Seo, S. Kwon, D. Lee and H. Choi, “Evaluation of Wear Behavior of Wheel Steel Using Twin-Disc Test,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 716, pp. 434–437, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Lewis and R. S. Dwyer-Joyce, “Wear mechanisms and transitions in railway wheel steels,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, vol. 218, no. 6, p. 467–478, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Rodríguez-Arana, A. Emeterio, M. Panera, A. Montes and D. Álvarez, “Investigation of a relationship between twin-disc wear rates and the slipping contact area on R260 grade rail,” Tribology International, vol. 168, pp. 1–15, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Stock and R. Pippan, “RCF and wear in theory and practice—The influence of rail grade on wear and RCF,” Wear, vol. 271, no. 1-2, pp. 125–133, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Clayton and D. Danks, “Effect of interlamellar spacing on the wear resistance of eutectoid steels under rolling-sliding conditions,” Wear, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 369–389, 1990. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Sato, P.M, Anderson and D.A. Rigney, “Rolling-sliding behavior of rail steels,” Wear, Vols. 162-164, pp. 159–172, 1993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Zani and C. Petrogalli, “Predictive maps for the rolling contact fatigue and wear interaction in railway wheel steels,” Wear, vol. 510-511, pp. 1–9, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Donzella, A. Mazzù and C. Petrogalli, “Competition between wear and rolling contact fatigue at the wheel—rail interface: some experimental evidence on rail steel,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 223, p. 31–44, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.