Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 375, 2023
21st International Conference Diagnostics of Machines and Vehicles “Hybrid Multimedia Mobile Stage”
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Selected Problems of Transport and Logistics of Hybrid Multimedia Mobile Stages
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202337502003
Published online 08 February 2023
  1. Holenko K.E., Krainyk L.V. Osoblyvosti formuvannia nesivnykh struktur karkasu avtobusa typu low-entry u Visnyku NU “Kharkivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut” 2008 r.s. 152-157s. [Google Scholar]
  2. K.E. Holenko, O.Z. Horbai, L.V. Krainyk “Kompiuterne modeliuvannia i analiz napruzheno-deformovanoho stanu karkasu kuzova avtobusa typu Low-entry” u Visnyku NU “Lvivska politekhnika”. “Dynamika, mitsnist ta proektuvannia mashyn i pryladiv.” 2008 r. № 614, s. 63–68 [Google Scholar]
  3. Holenko K. E. Otsinka totozhnosti modeliuvannia vidpovidnosti avtobusiv pravylu № 66 YeEK OON ta eksperymentalnykh vyprobuvan / K. E. Holenko, O. Z. Horbai, L. V. Krainyk // Visnyk Nats. tekhn. un-tu “KhPI” : zb. nauk. pr. Temat. vyp. : Avtomobileta traktorobuduvannia. – Kharkiv : NTU “KhPI”. – 2010. – № 1. – S. 101-109. [Google Scholar]
  4. Regulation No 66 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform technical prescriptions concerning the approval of large passenger vehicles with regard to the strength of their superstructure (OJ L 321 06.12.2007, p. 55, ELI: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/69a98949-88be-4e2a-bcb7d26d4e8778b3) [Google Scholar]
  5. Optymizatsiia struktury i mitsnosti avtobusnoho kuzova typu Low-entry: avtoref. dys. ... kand. tekhn. nauk : 05.22.02 / Holenko Kostiantyn Eduardovych ; Nats. unt “Lviv. politekhnika”. L., 2011. 20 s. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kamarajan Balakrishnan, Arvind Sharma, Rajib Ali, Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Finite Element Methods and its Effectiveness for Drop Test of Electronic Control Unit, Procedia Engineering, Volume 173, 2017, Pages 424-431, ISSN 1877-7058, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.042. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ivan Rooij, R. (2011). Implicit versus explicit comparatives. In P. Égré, & N. Klinedinst (Eds.), Vagueness and language use (pp. 51-72). (Palgrave studies in pragmatics, language and cognition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299313_3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brooks, L., Miller, A. (1979). A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of an Alphabet. In: Kolers, P.A., Wrolstad, M.E., Bouma, H. (eds) Processing of Visible Language. Nato Conference Series, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0994-9_24 [Google Scholar]
  9. Matolcsy, M. The severity of bus rollover accidents, Scientific Societyof Mechanical Engineers, Paper Number: 07 0989, Hungary. 2007. https://trid.trb.org/view/1367782 [Google Scholar]
  10. Özgün Küçük. “ROLLOVER CRASHWORTHINESS OF A MULTIPURPOSE COACH.” (2014). https://www.academia.edu/12279444/Rollover_Crashworthiness_Of_A_Multipurpose_Coach [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.