Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 373, 2022
10th edition of the International Multidisciplinary Symposium “UNIVERSITARIA SIMPRO 2022”: Quality and Innovation in Education, Research and Industry – the Success Triangle for a Sustainable Economic, Social and Environmental Development
Article Number 00074
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202237300074
Published online 20 December 2022
  1. J. Kenny, J of Educational Technology 20 (3), 388–404 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  2. A.W. Bates, Managing Technological Change. Strategies for College and University Leaders (Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  3. PMI, (2019) What is Project Management. Available on https://www.pmi.org/about/learn-aboutpmi/what-is-project-management (accessed in January 2022) [Google Scholar]
  4. UNDP, (1997) Project formulation, feasibility studies and appraisal. Module II Aid Management Programme, National Planning Commission and United Nations Development Programme [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Hannam, (2019) Five way to apply project management in school system. Focus, The creativity and productivity blog. Available on. https://www.meistertask.com/blog/5-ways-applyproject-management-in-school/ (accessed in March 2022) [Google Scholar]
  6. Google1 (2019) The future of classroom. Google for Education. Available on http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/future_of_the_classroom_emerging_trends_in_k12_education.pdf?utm_source=web&utm_campaign=FY19-Q2-global-demandgen-website-otherfutureoftheclassroom (accessed in February 2022) [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Hidalgo, J of Research Practice, 14 (1) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Krehbiel, P. Salzaruloa, M. Cosmaha, J. Forrena, G. Gannodb, D. Havelka, Hulshulta, J. Merhouta, J. of Effective Teaching, 17 (2), 90–111 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. van Bennekum, A. Cockburn, W. Cunningham, M. Fowler, D. Thomas, (2001) Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Available on http://agilemanifesto.org (accessed in March 2022) [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Dingsoyr, S. Nerur, V. Balijepally, N.B. Moe, J of Systems and Software, 85 (6), 1213–1221 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  11. J.C. Stewart, C.S. DeCusatis, K. Kidder, J.R. Massi, K.M. Student-Faculty Research Day, CSIS, Pace University B3 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  12. Jazillify Available on https://supporthere.org/sites/default/files/towards_agile_education_model_jasmina_nkolic.pdf (accessed in March 2022) [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Kamat, Proceedings 2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Technology for Education, 231–232. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Lang, Information Systems & Computing Academic Professionals 14 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  15. G.C. Gannod, D.A. Troy, J.E. Luczaj, D.T. Rover, Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 1–3 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Royle, J. Nikolic, J.Educ. Soc. Policy 3, 37–47 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Dovleac, A. Ionica, Proceedings of MSE 17, 121 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. A.F, Fuad, A.C. Ionica, M. Leba, S. Riurean, Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Comprehensible Science ICCS 21 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Fronza, N. E. Ioini, L. Corral, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 17 (4), 1–28 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Kastl, U. Kiesmüller, R. Romeike, Primary and Secondary Computing Education WiPSCE 16 60–65 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Romeike, T. Gottel, Primary and Secondary Computing Education WiPSCE 12 48–57 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  22. I. Noguera, A.E. Guerrero-Roldán, R. Masó, Computers & Education, 116, 110–129 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Vivian, K. Falkner, N. Falkner, Proceedings International Conference on Computing Education Research Koli Calling 2013 13, 105–114 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  24. L.O. Seman, R. Hausmann, E.A. Bezerra, Computers & Education, 117, 16–30 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M.O. Ahmad, K. Liukkunen, J. Markkula, Proceedings of IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference EDUCON2014 14, 422–428 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  26. V.T. Heikkila, M. Paasivaara, C. Lassenius, Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training Track ICSE-SEET 2016 16, 471–480 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Lembo, M. Vacca, Technical Report 8 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Stapel, D. Lubke, E. Knauss, Proceeding of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE 2008 769–776 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  29. G. Melnik, F. Maurer, Proceeding of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE 481– 488 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Delhij, R. van Solingen, W. Wijnands, (2015) The eduScrum Guide (1.2) 21 Available on http://eduscrum.nl/en/file/CKFiles/The_eduScrum_Guide_EN_1.2.pdf (accessed in November 2021) [Google Scholar]
  31. S.D. Zorzo, L. D de Ponte, Proceedings of In IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE13) 455–461 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Missiroli, D. Russo, P. Ciancarini, Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Engineering Curricula for Millennials (SECM17) 17, 47–53 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  33. J.P. Steghöfer, H. Burden, H. Alahyari, D. Haneberg, J of Systems and Software, 131, 230–247. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  34. C.G. Von Wangenheim, R. Savi, A.F. J of Systems and Software, 86 (10), 2675– 2687 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  35. P. Gestwicki, B. McNely, Proceedings of ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 16 (2), 1–24 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  36. J.O. Ringert, B. Rumpe, C. Schulze, C., A. Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training Track ICSESEET2017, 17, 127–136 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Duvall, D. Hutchings, M. Kleckner, J of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 33 (2), 182–189 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  38. M.E. Grimheden, Mechatronics, 23 (8), 967–973 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  39. D. Madrazo, The Effect of Technology Infusion on At-Risk High School Students Motivation to Learn. A PHD Dissertation in Education. Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership Reich College of Education (2011) [Google Scholar]
  40. B. Plaza, Aslib Proceedings Emerald Group Publishing Limited 61 (5) 474–482 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  41. K. Huotari, J. Hamari, Proceedings of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference (2012) [Google Scholar]
  42. M.S. Kuo, T.Y. Chuang, Computers in Human Behavior, 55 (A), 16–27 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.025(2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. P. Buckley, E. Doyle, Interactive Learning Environments, 24 (6), 1162–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.964263 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Kim, K. Song, B. Lockee, J. Burton, Gamification in learning and education: Enjoy learning like gaming 25–38 Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3319-47283-6 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  45. J. Santos, K. Verbert, S. Govaerts, E. Duval, Addressing learner issues with StepUp! an evaluation. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '13), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460301 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  46. E. Kyewski, N. Kramer, Computers & Education, 118, 25–37 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  47. Y. Butler, Research Papers in Education, 30 (2) 164–191 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  48. S. Kim, K. Song, B. Lockee, J. Burton, What is gamification in learning and education? In Gamification in learning and education: Enjoy learning like gaming 25–38 Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3319-47283-6 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  49. R. Van Roy, B. Zaman, Computers & Education, 127, 283–297 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.018 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. R. Alsawaier, Int J of Information and Learning Technology, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  51. S. Machajewski, Blackboard World Conference 17 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  52. T. Buhagiar, L. Christopher, J of Instructional Pedagogies, 20 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  53. G. Goehle, J. Wagaman, Web Based Homework PRIMUS, 26 (6) 557–569 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  54. J. Martí-Parreño, E. Méndez-Ibáñez, A. Alonso-Arroyo, J of Computer Assisted Learning, 32 (6), 663–676. doi:10.1111/jcal.12161 (2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.