Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 373, 2022
10th edition of the International Multidisciplinary Symposium “UNIVERSITARIA SIMPRO 2022”: Quality and Innovation in Education, Research and Industry – the Success Triangle for a Sustainable Economic, Social and Environmental Development
Article Number 00047
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 20 December 2022
  1. I.C. Jitea, N.I. Vlasin, A. Kovacs, E. Ghicioi, G. Vasilescu, E. Gheorghiosu, M. Prodan, Computational Study in the Civil Use Explosives Area, 14th GeoConference on Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration and Mining (SGEM), 139–145, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. S.A. Akers, R. Weed, D.D. Rickman, K. Danielson, Numerical Simulations of Explosive Wall Breaching, Proceedings of the Users Group Conference, Computer Society, (2005) [Google Scholar]
  3. S.A. Akers, D.D. Rickman, J. Ehrgott, Numerical Simulations of Blast Pressures During Wall Breaching, Proceedings of the Users Group Conference, Computer Society, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  4. J.D. Anderson Jr., Computational Fluid Dynamics, (McGraw-Hill series, 1995) [Google Scholar]
  5. FM 3–34.214. Explosives and demolitions, Department of the Army, 2007, USA. [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Gebbeken, M.A. Ruppert, New material model for concrete in high-dynamic hydrocode simulations, Arch. Appl. Mech., 70 (7), 463–478 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. E.Gheorghiosu, G. Vasilescu, E. Ghicioi, D. C. Rus, A. Kovacs, Research on decreasing the seismic effect generated by blasting works performed in quarries, 15th Anniversary International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconferences SGEM 2015, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Beppu, T. Ohno, K. Ohkubo, B. Li, K. Satoh, International Journal of Protective Structures, 1 (2), 257–270 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. N.K. Birnbaum, R.A. Clegg, G.E. Fairlie, Analysis of Blast Loads on Buildings, Century Dynamics Incorporated, ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Structures Under Extreme Loading Conditions (1996) [Google Scholar]
  10. R.H. Codina, D.B. Ambrosini, F.M. Columnas sometidas a explosiones de campo cercano. XXXVII Jornadas Sudamericanas de Ingenieria Estructural (2016). [Google Scholar]
  11. B.M. Dobratz, Properties of Chemical Explosives ans Explosive Simulants, Universidade da Califórnia, UCRL-51319, Laboratório Lawrance Livermore (1972) [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Hartmann, A. Pietzsch, N.A. Gebbeken, International Journal of Protective Structures, 1 (4), 443–468 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Kim, J. Ahn, H. Ahn, Advances in Structural Engineering, 19 (6), 982–994 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. ANSYS Autodyn Interactive Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis software version15. User’s Manual, SAS IP Inc, 2014, USA. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Esteban, N.A. Gebbeken. Int. J. of Comput. Methods Exp. Meas., 4 (3), 231–246 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. R.W. Gurney, The Initial Velocities of Fragments from Bombs, Shells and Grenades, BRL Report 405 (September 1943) [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Herrmann, J. Appl. Phys., 40 (6), 2490–2499 (1969) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.