Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 373, 2022
10th edition of the International Multidisciplinary Symposium “UNIVERSITARIA SIMPRO 2022”: Quality and Innovation in Education, Research and Industry – the Success Triangle for a Sustainable Economic, Social and Environmental Development
Article Number 00046
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202237300046
Published online 20 December 2022
  1. American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE. (2000). Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, 2nd Edition (Second Edition), New York [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Aven, Risk Analysis: Assessing Uncertainties Beyond Expected Values and Probabilities. Wiley – UK, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Bejinariu, D.-C. Darabont, Baciu E.-R., I.-S. Georgescu, M.-A. Bernevig-Sava, C. Baciu, Considerations on Applying the Method for Assessing the Level of Safety at Work. Sustainability, 9 (7), 1263 (2017)https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071263 [Google Scholar]
  4. D.-C. Darabont, R.I. Moraru, A.E. Antonov, C. Bejinariu,. Managing new and emerging risks in the context of ISO 45001 standard. Quality-Access to Success, 18, 11–14 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  5. Explosives regulations. (2014). Explosives regulations 2014: safety provisions: guidance on regulations. Merseyside: Health and Safety Executive, HSE Books [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Kovacs, G. Vasilescu, E.Gheorghiosu, D. Rus, I.-C. Jitea, S. Bordos,. Appropriate management of preventing actions on health and safety for testing activities of high explosives in confined environment. Quality-Access to Success, 18, 93–96 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Ross, J. Tatom, IMESAFR Version 2.0, Safety Assessment for Risk. Technical Manual. A-P-T Research Inc, USA: Institute of Makers of Explosives (2015) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Ozunu, C. Anghel, Evaluarea riscului tehnologic și securitatea mediului, Ed. Accent, Cluj-Napoca, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Mannan, Lees, Loss Prevention în the Process Industries. Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control, Elsevier, Third Edition, Oxford, (2005) [Google Scholar]
  10. Austrian Permanent Seveso Working Group, Calculation of appropriate distances for the purposes of Land Use Planning, Emergency Planning and Domino Effects. [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Cavender, S. Phillips, M. Holland, Development of emergency response planning guidelines (ERPGs), Journal of Medical Toxicology, 4 (2), 127–131 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  12. ***Law no.126 of december 27,1995*) on the regime of explosives and Technical Standards with subsequent additions and amendments. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.