Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 373, 2022
10th edition of the International Multidisciplinary Symposium “UNIVERSITARIA SIMPRO 2022”: Quality and Innovation in Education, Research and Industry – the Success Triangle for a Sustainable Economic, Social and Environmental Development
Article Number 00031
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202237300031
Published online 20 December 2022
  1. J.C. Conte, E. Rubio, A.I. Garcia, F. Cano, Safety Sc, 49, 306–314 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  2. V.T. Covello, M.W. Merkhofer, Risk assessment methods. Approaches for assessing health and environmental risks (Berlin-Heidelberg-New pringer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1993) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Cruz, Operational risk modelling and analysis. Theory and practice (Risk Book, a Division of Incisive Financial Publishing Ltd, London, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Darabont, S. Pece, A. Dascalescu, Occupational Health and Safety Management, I, II (AGIR Publishing House, Romania, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Kotus, B. Kostek, Archives of Acoustics, 33 (4), 435-440 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Leba, A. Ionica, R. Dobra, V.M. Pasculescu, Env Eng and Manag J, 13 (6), 1365-1370 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H.S. Lee, H. Kim, M. Park, J of Comp in Civil Eng, 26 (3), 319-330 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Hardwick, J. Hall, J. Tatom, R. Baker, T. Ross, M. Swisdak, Approved Methods and Algorithms for DoD Risk-Based Explosive Siting, Technic document DDESB 14 Revision 4a (2016) [Google Scholar]
  9. APT CDES-AL011-18-00100, Probability of Event Study (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Nichols, J. Chrostowski, G. Nickell, J. Flores, B. Fulmer, Literature Review of Risk Methodologies Used in Industries and Disciplines other than DoD and How Those Methodologies May Be Applied to DoD Risk-Based Siting, APT CDES-AL011-17-00500, 10 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Santis, M. Hardwick, D. Leidel, J. Tatom, IMESAFR—A Tool for Managing Risk from Commercial Explosives Operations, Minutes of the 32nd DDESB Explosives Safety Seminar (2006) [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Tatom,M. Hardwick, L. Santis, A Comparison of SAFER and IMESAFR Methods, Features, and Models, Minutes of the 32nd DDESB Explosives Safety Seminar (2006) [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Tatom, L. Santis, A New Tool for Managing Risk with Commercial Explosive Operations, Minutes of PARARI 2007 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Santis, Managing Commercial Explosives Operations Using Quantitative Risk Assessment, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting Techniques (2008) [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Tatom, L. Santis, D. Leidel, The Status of Risk Assessment in the Commercial Explosives Community, Minutes of the 33rd DDESB Explosives Safety Seminar (2008) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.