EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 361 (2022) MATEC Web Conf., 361 (2022) 05001 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 361, 2022
Concrete Solutions 2022 – 8th International Conference on Concrete Repair, Durability & Technology
Article Number 05001
Number of page(s) 6
Section Theme 5 - Concrete and Admixture Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202236105001
Published online 30 June 2022
  1. Naghizadeh A. and Ekolu S.O. (2017), Pozzolanic materials and waste products for formulation of geopolymer cements in developing countries: a Review, Concrete Beton, Journal of Concrete Society of Southern Africa, Nov 2017, Number 151, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
  2. Naghizadeh A. and Ekolu S.O (2019), Method for comprehensive mix design of fly ash geopolymer mortars, Construction and Building Materials, 202, 704–717. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tchadjie L.N., Ekolu S.O., Quainoo H. and Tematio P. (2021), Effect of incorporation of mechanically activated bauxite on the strength and microstructure of volcanic ash-based geopolymer mortars, Journal of Building Engineering, March 41(7):102384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hardjito, D., Cheak, C.C. and Ing, C.H.L. (2008) Strength and setting times of low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer mortar. Modern applied science, 2(4) 3–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Naghizadeh, A. and Ekolu, S. (2018) Effect of mix parameters on strength of geopolymer mortars - experimental study, 6th International Conference on the Durability of Concrete Structures, 18 - 20 July 2018, Leeds, United Kingdom, 315-319. [Google Scholar]
  6. Naghizadeh, A. and Ekolu, S.O. (2021), Effects of compositional and physico – chemical mix design parameters on properties of fly ash geopolymer mortars, Journal of Silicon, 13 (12) 4669–4680 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Van Chanh, N., Trung, B.D., Van Tuan, D. (2008) Recent research geopolymer concrete, The 3rd ACF International Conference - ACF/VCA, Vietnam, 2008, 235–241. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wijaya, S.W. and Hardjito, D. (2016) Factors affecting the setting time of fly ash-based geopolymer. Materials Science Forum 841: 90–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gourley, J.T., (2003) Geopolymers; opportunities for environmentally friendly construction materials. In Materials Conference: Adaptive Materials for a Modern Society, Sydney, Australia. [Google Scholar]
  10. Neupane, K., Chalmers, D. and Kidd, P., (2018) High-Strength Geopolymer Concrete Properties, Advantages and Challenges, Advances in Materials,7(2), pp.15–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shalini, A., Gurunarayanan, G. and Sakthivel, S. (2016) Performance of rice husk ash in geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science and Technology, 2(12), pp.73–77. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jawahar, J.G. and Mounika, G. (2016) Strength properties of fly ash and GGBS based geopolymer concrete. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(1), pp.127–135. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chougan, M., Ghaffar, S.H., Jahanzat, M., Albar, A., Mujaddedi, N. and Swash, R. (2020) The influence of nano-additives in strengthening mechanical performance of 3D printed multi-binder geopolymer composites. Construction and Building Materials, 250 : 118928, [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sethi, H., Bansal, P.P. and Sharma, R. (2019) Effect of addition of GGBS and glass powder on the properties of geopolymer concrete. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 43(4) 607–617. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Topark-Ngarm, P., Chindaprasirt, P. and Sata, V. (2015) Setting time, strength, and bond of high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Journal of materials in civil engineering, 27(7) 04014198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rattanasak, U., Pankhet, K., and Chindaprasirt, P. (2011) “Effect of chemical admixtures on properties of high-calcium fly ash geopolymer.” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 18(3) 364–369. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nath, P. and Sarker, P.K. (2014) Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Construction and Building Materials, 66:163–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hajimohammadi, A., van Deventer J.S.J. (2016) solid reactant-based geopolymers from rice husk ash and sodium aluminate, Waste and Biomass Valorization, 8: 2131–2140. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ardiantoro, A., Sunarsih, E.S., and Sucipto T.L.A. (2021) The role of rice husk ash in enhancing the fresh properties, density, and compressive strength of fly ash based self compacting geopolymer concrete, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1808 (2021) 012014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. ASTM C 109 (2016) Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars ( using 2-in . or [ 50-mm ] cube specimens ), Annual book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. http://www.astm.org. [Google Scholar]
  21. ASTM C 807 (2020) Standard Test method for time of setting of hydraulic cement mortar by modified Vicat needle, Annual book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. http://www.astm.org. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.