EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 357 (2022) MATEC Web Conf., 357 (2022) 03008 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 357, 2022
25th Polish-Slovak Scientific Conference on Machine Modelling and Simulations (MMS 2020)
Article Number 03008
Number of page(s) 12
Section Machine Dynamics and Multibody Systems Simulation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202235703008
Published online 22 June 2022
  1. L. Pettersson Vibration analysis of a boring bar. Research Report: Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden (2002). [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Takeyama, N. Iijima, N. Nishiwaki, K. Komoto Improvement of dynamic rigidity of tool holder by applying high-damping material CIRP Annals, 33, 1, 249–252 (1984). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. T.L. Schmitz, K. Powell, D. Won, G.S. Duncan, W.G. Sawyer, J.C. Ziegert Shrink fit tool holder connection stiffness/damping modeling for frequency response prediction in milling International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47, 9, 1368–1380 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Freyermuth, M. Ostermann, R.O.O.S. Cédric U.S. Patent No. 8,899,891. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2014). [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Denkena, B. Bergmann, C. Teige Frictionally damped tool holder for long projection cutting tools Production Engineering, 12, 6, 715–722 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Lee, A.H. Ghasemi, C.E. Okwudire, J. Scruggs A linear feedback control framework for optimally locating passive vibration isolators with known stiffness and damping parameters Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 139, 1, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Sasaki, T. Ishida U.S. Patent No. 8,708,620. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2014). [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Mohan, U. Natarajan Experimental investigation on boring tool vibration control using MR fluid damper Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 15, 1, 13–25 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S.L. Eichelberger U.S. Patent No. 9,586,266. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. M.R. McCormick, R.F. de Souza Filho U.S. Patent No. 9,630,258. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2017). [Google Scholar]
  11. J.C. Ziegert, C. Stanislaus, T.L. Schmitz, R. Sterling Enhanced damping in long slender end mills. Journal of No. 10,022,806. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2018). [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Langbein, D. Lembke Damping elements for tool chucking systems. U.S. Patent No. 10,022,806. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. R.K. Singh, R. Kant, S.S. Pandey, M. Asfer, B. Bhattacharya, P.K. Panigrahi, S. Bhattacharya Passive vibration damping using polymer pads with microchannel arrays Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 22,3, 695–707 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C.C. Chang, S.Y. Hsia, H.D. Huang Improvement on CNC drilling quality using vibration suppression fixture. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI), pp. 910–913 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M.A. Butt, Y. Yang, X. Pei, Q. Liu Five-axis milling vibration attenuation of freeform thin-walled part by eddy current damping Precision Engineering, 51, 682–690 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H.G. Ram, S. Saravanamurugan Regenerative chatter control in turning process using constrained viscoelastic vibration absorber. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 577-1, 012152 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Aggogeri, A. Borboni, A. Merlo, N. Pellegrini, R. Adamini, C. Taesi Design of damped structures to increase machine tool dynamical performance. In: ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection (2018). [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Lawrance, P.S. Paul, X.A. Vasanth, A.S. Varadarajan, E. Daniel Influence of magnetorheological elastomer on tool vibration and cutting performance during boring of hardened AISI4340 steel Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 33, 4, 1555–1561 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Kajiwara, S. Kitabatake, N. Hosoya, S. Maeda Design of dielectric elastomer actuators for vibration control at high frequencies International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 157, 849–857 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. K.M. Mohanasundaram, B. Sathishkumar A case study on vibration control in a boring bar using particle damping International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 3, 8, 177–184 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  21. R.F. Filho Boring bars and methods of making the same. U.S. Patent Application No. 14/751, 929 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  22. R.F. Filho Optimized vibration absorber U.S. Patent No. 9,533,357. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2017). [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Takaaki, I. Tsunekazu Anti vibration tool holder. U.S. Patent No. 8708620B2 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Haimer U.S. Patent No. 9,862,032. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2018). [Google Scholar]
  25. H.D. Cook Tool holder dampening system. U.S. Patent No. US8043036B2 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  26. N.J. Paros, C.A. Swope, D.E. Keller U.S. Patent No. 9,422,812. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2016). [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Rubio-Mateos, A. Rivero, E. Ukar, A. Lamikiz Influence of Elastomer Layers in the Quality of Aluminum Parts on Finishing Operations Metals, 10, 2, 289 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. F. Aggogeri, F. Al-Bender, B. Brunner, M. Elsaid, M. Mazzola, A. Merlo, E. Salvi Design of piezo-based AVC system for machine tool applications Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 36, 1, 53–65 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Matsubara, M. Maeda, I. Yamaji Vibration suppression of boring bar by piezoelectric actuators and LR circuit CIRP Annals, 63, 1, 373–376 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Webpage EMUGE: https://www.emuge.com/products/tool-holders/tap-holders-0 - access 10.08.2020. [Google Scholar]
  31. M.F. Zaeh, R. Kleinwort, P. Fagerer, Y. Altintas Automatic tuning of active vibration control systems using inertial actuators CIRP Annals, 66, 1, 365–368 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. A.A. Tootoonchi, M.S. Gholami Application of time delay resonator to machine tools The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 56, 9-12, 879–891 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Parus, B. Powałka, K. Marchelek, S. Domek, M. Hoffmann Active vibration control in milling flexible workpieces Journal of Vibration and Control, 19, 7, 1103–1120 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Munoa et al. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  35. R. Kishore, S.K. Choudhury, K. Orra On-line control of machine tool vibration in turning operation using electro-magneto rheological damper Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 31, 187–198 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. C.E. Okwudire, J. Lee Minimization of the residual vibrations of ultra-precision manufacturing machines via optimal placement of vibration isolators Precision Engineering, 37, 2, 425–432 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. K.J. Kalinski, M.A. Galewski Chatter vibration surveillance by the optimal-linear spindle speed control Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25, 1, 383–399 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. X. Zou, Z. Li, X. Zhao, T. Sun, K. Zhang Study on the auto-leveling adjustment vibration isolation system for the ultra-precision machine tool. In: 7th International Symposium on Advanced Optical Manufacturing and Testing Technologies: Advanced Optical Manufacturing Technologies, International Society for Optics and Photonics. vol. 9281, pp. 92812L. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  39. Y. Mani, M. Senthilkumar Shape memory alloy-based adaptive-passive dynamic vibration absorber for vibration control in piping applications Journal of Vibration and Control, 21, 9, 1838–1847 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Siddhpura, R. Paurobally A review of chatter vibration research in turning International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 61, 27–47 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Y. Yang, J. Munoa, Y. Altintas Optimization of multiple tuned mass dampers to suppress machine tool chatter International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 50, 9, 834–842 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. X. Long, H. Jiang, G. Meng Active vibration control for peripheral milling processes Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 213, 5, 660–670 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Y. Yang, W. Dai, Q. Liu Design and implementation of two-degree-of-freedom tuned mass damper in milling vibration mitigation Journal of Sound and Vibration, 335, 7888 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Chen, M.Y. Wang Designing distributed compliant mechanisms with characteristic stiffness. In: ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. pp. 33–45 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  45. M.Y. Wang, S. Chen Compliant mechanism optimization: analysis and design with intrinsic characteristic stiffness Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 37, 2, 183–200 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. C.B.W. Pedersen, A.A. Seshia Compliant force amplifier mechanisms for surface micromachined resonant accelerometers In: Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show (Nanotech 2004), Boston MA: NSTI Nanoteeh. 2, 331–334 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  47. A.B. Bhaskar, G. Krishnan, G.K.A. Ananthasuresh Meso-scale Accelerometer using a Hall-effect Sensor and a Displacement-amplifying Compliant Mechanism. In: 13th National Conference on Mechanisms and Machines (NaCoMM07), IISc, Bangalore, India, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  48. N. Satpute, B. Kudachi, J.L. Maikulal, B. Mashilkar, A.R. Mali Implemetation of Mechanical Motion Amplifier in Hybrid Shock Absorber with Linear Generator and Fluid Damper. In: 2019 International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE) pp. 1–6 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  49. L. Li, B. Sun, H. Hua Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of a Boring Bar with a Variable Stiffness Dynamic Vibration Absorber. Shock and Vibration (2019). [Google Scholar]
  50. J. Flizikowski, W. Kruszelnicka, M. Macko The Development of Efficient Contaminated Polymer Materials Shredding in Recycling Processes Polymers, 13, 713 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. M. Macko Economic-energetic analysis of multi-edge comminution of polymer recyclates Przemysl Chemiczny, 92, 8, 1499–1502 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  52. M. Macko, A. Mroziński, A. Prentki, A. Simulations CAE of wood pellet machine In: MATEC Web of Conferences, 254, 02028 (2019). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  53. J. Kopowski, I. Rojek, D. Mikołajewski, M. Macko 3D printed hand exoskeleton-own concept. In: Springer- Advances in manufacturing II. pp. 298–306 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. M. Macko, A. Mroziński, J.Z. Flizikowski Design and utility of specialist comminution set-up for plastics and organic materials In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 54891, 397–402 (2011). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.