Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2021
10th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education – MSE 2021
Article Number 04010
Number of page(s) 9
Section Computer-Aided Technologies (CAD/CAM/CAE - CAX), Virtual Engineering and Reverse Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202134304010
Published online 04 August 2021
  1. I. I. Cofaru, P. D. Brindasu, N. F. Cofaru, Applied Mechanics and Materials, ISSN: 1660-9336, ISSN/ISO: Applied Mechanics and Materials, (2013); [Google Scholar]
  2. N. F. Cofaru, I. I. Cofaru, R. E. Petruse, M. Rackov, M. Blagojevic, N. Marjanovic, MATEC Web of Conferences 299, 03011 (2019); [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. N. F. Cofaru, I. I. Cofaru, V. S. Oleksik, A. Pascu, M. V. Dragoi, KOD2018 IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 393 (2018); [Google Scholar]
  4. N. F. Cofaru, M. D. Roman, I. I. Cofaru, V. S. Oleksik, S. R. Fleaca, Applied Biosciences and Bioengineering, Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417), Special Issue “Biomechanical and Biomedical Factors of Knee Osteoarthritis”, (2020); [Google Scholar]
  5. N. F. Cofaru, I. I. Cofaru, V. Marjanović, N. Marjanović, M. Blagojević and R. E. Petruse, CAD modeling of the closing High tibial osteotomy, (2019); [Google Scholar]
  6. I. I. Cofaru, N. Cofaru, Computer assisted approach to the axial deviations of the human lower limb, Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering – AJME, (2017); [Google Scholar]
  7. I. Huzu, N. F. Cofaru, 657, Engineering Solutions and Technologies in Manufacturing, (2014); [Google Scholar]
  8. I. I. Cofaru, The CAD modelling of the human tibia affected by form deviations, Fascicle of Management and Technological Engineering, Issue 1, (2014); [Google Scholar]
  9. Z. Yosibash, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg, pp. 169–184, (2012); [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Chan, Handbook of Footwear Design and Manufacture, pp. 3-26, (2013); [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Wesker, Thieme Atlas of Anatomy: General Anatomy and Musculoskeletal System. (2007); [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Standring, Gray’s Anatomy, thirty-ninth ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. J. Orthop. Res. 13 (4), pp. 609–614, (2005); [Google Scholar]
  13. Z. Milojević, S. Navalušić, R. Obradović, M. Milankov, M. V. Drăgoi, L. Beju, Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering 8 (1), pp. 73-78, (2010); [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Voo, Johns Hopkins Apl Technical Digest, 25, Number 3, (2004); [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Peacock, D. L. Koller, D. Lai, S. Hui, T. Foroud, M. J. Econs, Bone, 37, pp. 467-473 (2005); [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Ćuković, R. E. Petruse, G. Meixner and L. Buchweitz, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 1926-1931, (2020); [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Schileo, J. Pitocchi, C. Falcinelli, F. Taddei, Bone, 136, (2020); [Google Scholar]
  18. I. I. Cofaru, P. D. Brîndaşu, N. F. Cofaru, L. Roman, Computer Simulation Paradigm Regarding the Structure and Mechanical Characteristics of Human Long Bones (2013); [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Wang, D. W. C. Wong, M. Zhang, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44 (1), pp. 213–221, (2016); [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Perrier, Biomechanics of Living Organs, Chapter 25, pp. 545-563, (2017); [Google Scholar]
  21. I. I. Cofaru, MATEC Web Conf, 121, No. 4004, (2017); [Google Scholar]
  22. I. I. Cofaru, E. I. Huzu, Generalized Modelling of the human lower limb assembly, The 1st International Conference for Doctoral Students, (2013); [Google Scholar]
  23. I. I. Cofaru, Biomechanic of the opening tibial osteotomy, Fascicle of Management and Technological Engineering, Issue 1, (2014); [Google Scholar]
  24. H. Arjmand, M. Nazemi, S. A. Kontulainen, C. E. McLennan, D. J. Hunter, D. R. Wilson, J. D. Johnston, Scientific Reports, 8, 11478, (2018); [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Polguj, K. Bliźniewska, K. Jędrzejewski, A. Majos, M. Topol, Morphological study of linea aspera variations: Proposal of classification and sexual dimorphism, (2013); [Google Scholar]
  26. J. O’Connor, L. M. Alves Borges, F. P. Duda, A. G. Barbosa da Cruz, Growth and reabsorption in biological tissues, (2015); [Google Scholar]
  27. K. Engelke, S. Prevrhal, H. K. Genant, Macroand Microimaging of Bone Architecture, (2008); [Google Scholar]
  28. K. C. N. Kumar, S. Chavadaki, V. Chaudhry, D. P. Singh, A. Shaikh, Material Proceedings, 26, Part 2, pp. 356-363, (2019); [Google Scholar]
  29. J. H. Gosman, Z. R. Hubbell, C. N. Shaw, T. M. Ryan, The anatomical record, 296, pp. 774–787 (2013); [Google Scholar]
  30. I. Goda, M. Assidi, J-F Ganghoffer, Cosserat Anisotropic Models of Trabecular Bone from the Homogenization of the Trabecular Structure: 2D and 3D Frameworks, (2013); [Google Scholar]
  31. N. Chantarapanich, S. Rojanasthien, B. Chernchujit, Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 22, pp. 703-709 (2017); [Google Scholar]
  32. D. M. Blaustein, E. M. Philips, Essentials of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Fourth Edition), pp. 391-398, (2019); [Google Scholar]
  33. S. D. Waldman, Pain Medicine: A Case-Based Learning Series, (2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.