Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 337, 2021
PanAm-Unsat 2021: 3rd Pan-American Conference on Unsaturated Soils
Article Number 01011
Number of page(s) 6
Section Fundamentals and Experimental Investigations
Published online 26 April 2021
  1. D. G. Fredlund, H. Rahardjo. (1993). Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. New York: John Wiley & Sons, INC. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D. G. Fredlund, A. Xing. (1994). Equations for the Soil-Water Characteristic Curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 31, 521–532. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. L. Barbour. (1998). The soil-water characteristic curve - a historical perspective and application to the behaviour of unsaturated soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 35, 873–894. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. K. Vanapalli, D. G. Fredlund, D. E. Pufahl. (1999). The effect of soil structure and stress history on the soil-water characteristics of a compacted till. Geotechnique. 49, No. 2, 143–159. [Google Scholar]
  5. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM D. 5298–92. (1992). Standard test method for measurement of soil potential (suction) using filter paper. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 15.09. [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Bicalho, A. Correia, S. Ferreira, J. M. Fleureau, F. A. M. Marinho. (2007). Filter paper method of soil suction measurement. [Google Scholar]
  7. F. A. M. Marinho, O. M. Oliveira. (2006). The filter paper method revisited. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 29, n. 3, p. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Ishimwe, J. Blanchard, R. Coffman. (2018). Field-Obtained Soil Water Characteristic Curves and Hydraulic Conductivity Functions. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 144. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. D. Fredlund, G.W. Wilson, D. G. Fredlund. (2002). Use of the grain-size distribution for estimation of the soil-water characteristic curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39, pp1103–1117. [Google Scholar]
  10. W. N. Houston, H. B. Dye, C. E. Zapata, Y. Perera, A. Harraz. (2006). Determination of SWCC using one point suction measurement and standard curves. 1482–1493.doi: 10.1061/40802(189)123. [Google Scholar]
  11. BS 1377–3:2018. (2018). Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. Chemical and Electro-chemical Testing. [Google Scholar]
  12. R Grisso, M. Alley, W. G. Wysor, D. Holshouser, W. Thomason. (2009). Precision Farming Tools: Soil Electrical Conductivity. Virginia Cooperative Extension. Precision Farming Tools: Soil Electrical Conductivity, Virginia Cooperative Extension Publication. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Mohamed, E. Paleologos. (2018). Electrical Properties of Soils. doi:10.1016/B978–0–12–804830–6.00014–4 [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Bohn, J. Ben-Asher, H. Tabbara, M. Marwan. (1982). Theories and Tests of Electrical Conductivity in Soils1. Soil Science Society of America Journal - SSSAJ. 46. 10.2136. [Google Scholar]
  15. DRM-RJ. (2011). Megadesastre da Serra. Governo do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, p.18–89. (in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Lago, C. Amaral, L. E. P. Campo, L. E. Silva. (2011). Megadesastre da Serra Fluminense: o deslizamento do Condomínio do Lago, em Nova Friburgo - análise preliminar dos condicionantes geológicos. In: Simpósio de Geologia do Sudeste. Nova Friburgo, RJ. (in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Samouëlian, I. Cousin, A. Tabbagh, A. Bruand, R. Guy. (2005). Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: A review. Soil and Tillage Research. 83. 173–193.doi;10.1016/j.still.2004.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Ozcep, O. Tezel, M. Asci. (2009). Correlation between Electrical Resistivity and Soil-Water Content: Istanbul and Golcuk. International Journal of Physical Sciences. 4. 362–365. [Google Scholar]
  19. Z. Abu-Hassanein, C. Benson, L. Blotz. (1996). Electrical Resistivity of Compacted Clays. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 122. 397–406. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733–9410(1996)122:5(397) [Google Scholar]
  20. J. D. McNeill. (1980). Electrical conductivity of soils and rocks (Geonics Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, Technical Note TN-5). [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Palacky. (1979). Effect of tropical weathering on electrical and electromagnetic measurements. Geophysics. 44, 69–88 doi: 10.1190/1.1440924 [Google Scholar]
  22. A. O. Pacheco. (2004). Resistive cone application in saturated soils, Master’s dissertation, COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 150p. (in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]
  23. R. B. Boszczowski, J. M. Silva. (2006). Electrical resistivity evaluation of a residual soil profile as a function of weathering and moisture content. XIII COBRAMSEG, Curitiba-PR, Brazil. (in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]
  24. M. T. Yamasaki, A. S. P. Peixoto, J. A. C. Ulson. (2010). Laboratory test for electrical resistivity evaluation in a sandy tropical soil. XV COBRAMSEG, Gramado - RS, Brazil. (in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]
  25. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. NBR 6457. (2016). Amostras de solo “Soil samples — Preparation for compaction and characterization tests” (in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]
  26. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. NBR 6458. (2016). Solo “Gravel grains retained on the 4,8 mm mesh sieve - Determination of the bulk specific gravity, of the apparent specific gravity and of water absorption” (in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]
  27. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. NBR 7181. (2016). Análise granulométrica “Grain size analysis” (in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]
  28. M. F. B. Motta (2016). Caracterização Físico-Hídrico-Estrutural e Efeito do Aumento da Pressão do Ar na Resistência de Solos Tropicais Não Saturados. DSc. Thesis. PUC-Rio (in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]
  29. T. de S. Carnavale, (2016). Desenvolvimento de um modelo físico para a análise de efeitos de trovões em solos. Master’s Thesis. PUC-Rio (in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.