EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 321 (2020) MATEC Web Conf., 321 (2020) 13002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 321, 2020
The 14th World Conference on Titanium (Ti 2019)
Article Number 13002
Number of page(s) 10
Section Wrought Processing and Fabrication
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202032113002
Published online 12 October 2020
  1. Ezugwu, E.O. & Bonney, J. Evaluation of the machinability of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with ( SiCw ) whisker reinforced alumina ceramic curring tool. [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Trent, P. Wright, Metal Cutting, Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, 2000. alloy, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 99 (2000) 266-274. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arrazola, P.J. et al. Machinability of titanium alloys (Ti6Al4V and Ti555.3). J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209, 2223-2230 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  4. Ugarte, A., M’Saoubi, R., Garay, A.& Arrazola, P.J. Machining behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-5553 alloys in interrupted cutting with PVD coated cemented carbide. Procedia CIRP 1, 202-207 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. Le Coz, G., Marinescu, M., Devillez, A., Dudzinski, D. Velnom, L. Measuring temperature of rotating cutting tools: Application to MQL drilling and dry milling of aerospace alloys. Appl. Therm. Eng. 36,441 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Leyens, M. Peters, Titanium and Titanium Alloys, Wiley-VCH, KÃ˝ uln, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sharif, S., Rahim, E.A. & Sasahara, H. Machinability of Titanium Alloys in Drilling. (2012). doi:10.5772/35948 [Google Scholar]
  8. Sharif, S. & Rahim, E.A. Performance of coated-and uncoated-carbide tools when drilling titanium alloy- Ti-6Al4V. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 185, 72-76 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, P.F., Churi, N.J., Pei, Z.J. & Treadwell, C. Mechanical drilling processes for titanium alloys: a literature review. Machining Science and Technology 12, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  10. Jindal, P.C., Santhanam, A.T., Schleinkofer, U. & Shuster, A.F. Performance of PVD TiN, TiCN, and TiAlN coated cemented carbide tools in turning. 17, 163-170 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Narutaki, A. Murakoshi, Study on machining of titanium alloys, CIRP Ann. 32 (1) (1983) 65-69. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Jawaid, S. Sharif, S. Koksal, Evaluation of wear mechanism of coated carbide tools when face milling titanium [Google Scholar]
  13. Jawaid, A., Che-Haron, C.H. & Abdullah, A. Tool wear characteristics in turning of titanium alloy Ti-6246. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 92-93, 329-334 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  14. Hutasoit, N. & Masood, S.H. Effect of volume fraction of alpha and transformed B on the high cycle fatigue properties of bimodal Ti6Al4V alloy. [Google Scholar]
  15. Y.L. Yang et al., “The Effect of Aluminum Equivalent and molybdenum Equivalent on the Mechanical Properties of High Strength and High Toughness Titanium Alloys”, Materials Science Forum, vols. 618-619, pp. 169-172, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  16. Khanna, N. & Sangwan, K.S. Machinability study of a / b and b titanium alloys in different heat treatment conditions. 227, 357â˘A ¸S361 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  17. Ezugwu, E.O. Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. 45, 1353-1367 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  18. Balaji, M., Venkata Rao, K., Mohan Rao, N. & Murthy, B.S. N. Optimization of drilling parameters Bonney, for drilling of TI-6Al-4V based on surface roughness, flank wear and drill vibration. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 114, 332-339 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  19. Jawaid, A., Che-Haron, C.H. & Abdullah, A. Tool wear characteristics in turning of titanium alloy Ti-6246. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 92-93, 329-334 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaynak, Y. & Gharibi, A. The effects of cutting parameters on machining performance of titanium alloy Ti-5553. Adv. Mater. Process. Technol. 5, 317-328 (2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.