MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 304, 20199th EASN International Conference on “Innovation in Aviation & Space”
|Number of page(s)||8|
|Published online||17 December 2019|
- O. Chételat, et al. Clinical validation of LTMS-S: A wearable system for vital signs monitoring. 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Milan, 2015, pp. 3125–3128. (2015) [Google Scholar]
- 2. B. Cinaz, et al. Monitoring of mental workload levels during an everyday life office-work scenario. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(2), pp. 229–239 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. M. Pendleton, et al. Mental engagement during cognitive and psychomotor tasks: Effects of task type, processing demands, and practice. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 109, pp.124–131, (2016) [Google Scholar]
- J. Dowell and J. Long, ‘Target paper: conception of the cognitive engineering design problem’, Ergonomics, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 126–139, (1998) [Google Scholar]
- S. J. Andriole and L. Adelman, Cognitive systems engineering for user-computer interface design, prototyping, and evaluation. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., (1995) [Google Scholar]
- J. Rasmussen, A. M. Pejtersen, and L. P. Goodstein, ‘Cognitive systems engineering’, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- K. J. Vicente, Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. CRC Press, (1999) [Google Scholar]
- J. D. Leeand A. Kirlik, Eds., The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering. New York: Oxford University Press, (2013) [Google Scholar]
- N. A. Stanton, Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, (2013) [Google Scholar]
- F. Biassoni, D. Ruscio, & R. Ciceri, Limitations and automation. The role of information about device-specific features in ADAS acceptability. Safety science, 85, 179–186, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.