Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 291, 2019
2019 The 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, System and Control Engineering (ICMSC 2019)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 5
Section Mechanical Engineering
Published online 28 August 2019
  1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 780–5. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jetté B, Brailovski V, Simoneau C, Dumas M, Terriault P. Development and in vitro validation of a simplified numerical model for the design of a biomimetic femoral stem. J Mech Behav Biomed. 2018; 77: 539–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Simoneau C, Terriault P, Jette B, Dumas M, Brailovski V. Development of a porous metallic femoral stem: Design, manufacturing, simulation and mechanical testing. Mater Design. 2017; 114: 546–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arabnejad S, Johnston B, Tanzer M, Pasini D. Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-shielding following total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Oshkour AA, Talebi H, Seyed Shirazi SF, Yau YH, Tarlochan F, Abu Osman NA. Effect of geometrical parameters on the performance of longitudinal functionally graded femoral prostheses. Artif Organs. 2015; 39: 156–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stickler Y, Martinek J, Hofer C, Rattay F. A finite element model of the electrically stimulated human thigh: changes due to denervation and training. Artif Organs. 2008; 32: 620–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ishida T, Nishimura I, Tanino H, Higa M, Ito H, Mitamura Y. Use of a Genetic Algorithm for Multiobjective Design Optimization of the Femoral Stem of a Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty. Artificial Organs. 2011; 35: 404–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baharuddin MY, Salleh S-H, Suhasril AA, Zulkifly AH, Lee MH, Omar MA, et al. Fabrication of Low-Cost, Cementless Femoral Stem 316L Stainless Steel Using Investment Casting Technique. Artificial Organs. 2014; 38: 603–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sivarasu S, Beulah P, Mathew L. Novel Approach for Designing a Low Weight Hip Implant Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty Adopting Skeletal Design Techniques. Artificial Organs. 2011; 35: 663–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Oki H, Ando M, Omori H, Okumura Y, Negoro K, Uchida K, et al. Relation Between Vertical Orientation and Stability of Acetabular Component in the Dysplastic Hip Simulated by Nonlinear Three-dimensional Finite Element Method. Artificial Organs. 2004; 28: 1050–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hashimoto N, Ando M, Yayama T, Uchida K, Kobayashi S, Negoro K, et al. Dynamic Analysis of the Resultant Force Acting on the Hip Joint During Level Walking. Artificial Organs. 2005; 29: 387–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gargiulo P, Petursson T, Magnusson B, Bifulco P, Cesarelli M, Izzo GM, et al. Assessment of Total Hip Arthroplasty by Means of Computed Tomography 3D Models and Fracture Risk Evaluation. Artificial Organs. 2013; 37: 567–73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Reggiani B, Cristofolini L, Taddei F, Viceconti M. Sensitivity of the primary stability of a cementless hip stem to its position and orientation. Artificial Organs. 2008; 32: 555–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Folgado J, Fernandes PR, Jacobs CR, Pellegrini VD. Influence of femoral stem geometry, material and extent of porous coating on bone ingrowth and atrophy in cementless total hip arthroplasty: an iterative finite element model. Comput Method Biomec. 2009; 12: 135–45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hedia HS, Shabara MAN, El-Midany TT, Fouda N. A Method of Material Optimization of Cementless Stem Through Functionally Graded Material. Int J Mech Mater Des. 2004; 1: 329–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mehboob H, Chang S-H. Application of composites to orthopedic prostheses for effective bone healing: A review. Composite Structures. 2014; 118: 328–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sridhar I, Adie PP, Ghista DN. Optimal design of customised hip prosthesis using fiber reinforced polymer composites. Mater Design. 2010; 31: 2767–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rezaei F, Hassani K, Solhjoei N, Karimi A. Carbon/PEEK composite materials as an alternative for stainless steel/titanium hip prosthesis: a finite element study. Australas Phys Eng S. 2015; 38: 569–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Oshkour AA, Abu Osman NA, Yau YH, Tarlochan F, Abas WA. Design of new generation femoral prostheses using functionally graded materials: a finite element analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013; 227: 3–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ramos A, Completo A, Relvas C, Simoes JA. Design process of a novel cemented hip femoral stem concept. Mater Design. 2012; 33: 313–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Limmahakhun S, Oloyede A, Sitthiseripratip K, Xiao Y, Yan C. 3D-printed cellular structures for bone biomimetic implants. Additive Manufacturing. 2017; 15: 93–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kadirgama K, Harun WSW, Tarlochan F, Samykano M, Ramasamy D, Azir MZ, et al. Statistical and optimize of lattice structures with selective laser melting (SLM) of Ti6AL4V material. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. 2018; 97: 495–510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mehboob H, Tarlochan F, Mehboob A, Chang SH. Finite element modelling and characterization of 3D cellular microstructures for the design of a cementless biomimetic porous hip stem. Mater Design. 2018; 149: 101–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meneghini RM, Meyer C, Buckley CA, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG. Mechanical Stability of Novel Highly Porous Metal Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2010; 25: 337–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mircheski I, Gradisar M. 3D finite element analysis of porous Ti-based alloy prostheses. Comput Method Biomec. 2016; 19: 1531-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gonzalez FJQ, Nuno N. Finite element modelling approaches for well-ordered porous metallic materials for orthopaedic applications: cost effectiveness and geometrical considerations. Comput Method Biomec. 2016; 19: 845–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jetté B, Brailovski V, Dumas M, Simoneau C, Terriault P. Femoral stem incorporating a diamond cubic lattice structure: Design, manufacture and testing. J Mech Behav Biomed. 2018; 77: 58–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang L, Kang JF, Sun CN, Li DC, Cao Y, Jin ZM. Mapping porous microstructures to yield desired mechanical properties for application in 3D printed bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants. Mater Design. 2017; 133: 62–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hedayati R, Hosseini-Toudeshky H, Sadighi M, Mohammadi-Aghdam M, Zadpoor AA. Computational prediction of the fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials. Int J Fatigue. 2016; 84: 67–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. de Krijger J, Rans C, Van Hooreweder B, Lietaert K, Pouran B, Zadpoor AA. Effects of applied stress ratio on the fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous biomaterials under compressive loading. J Mech Behav Biomed. 2017; 70: 7–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zargarian A, Esfahanian M, Kadkhodapour J, Ziaei-Rad S. Numerical simulation of the fatigue behavior of additive manufactured titanium porous lattice structures. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater. 2016; 60: 339–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dumas M, Terriault P, Brailovski V. Modelling and characterization of a porosity graded lattice structure for additively manufactured biomaterials. Mater Design. 2017; 121: 383–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Senalp AZ, Kayabasi O, Kurtaran H. Static, dynamic and fatigue behavior of newly designed stem shapes for hip prosthesis using finite element analysis. Mater Design. 2007; 28: 1577–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Damm P, Kutzner I, Bergmann G, Rohlmann A, Schmidt H. Comparison of in vivo measured loads in knee, hip and spinal implants during level walking. J Biomech. 2017; 51: 128–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001; 34: 859–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wauthle R, Ahmadi SM, Yavari SA, Mulier M, Zadpoor AA, Weinans H, et al. Revival of pure titanium for dynamically loaded porous implants using additive manufacturing. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater. 2015; 54: 94–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yavari SA, Wauthle R, van der Stok J, Riemslag AC, Janssen M, Mulier M, et al. Fatigue behavior of porous biomaterials manufactured using selective laser melting. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater. 2013; 33: 4849–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.