Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 289, 2019
Concrete Solutions 2019 – 7th International Conference on Concrete Repair
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Electrochemical Repair
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928903005
Published online 28 August 2019
  1. Bertolini, L., et al., Corrosion of Steel in Concrete: Prevention, Diagnosis, Repair, 2nd Edition. 2013: Wiley & Sons. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chaussadent, T. and R. Dron, Influence of hydroxyls, carbonates and chloride ions on the pitting corrosion of steel. Materiales de construcción, 1992. 42(226): p. 49-62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glass, G. and N.R. Buenfeld, Chloride-induced corrosion of steel in concrete,. Progress in Structural Engineering & Materials, 2000: p. 448-458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Angst, U., et al., Critical chloride content in reinforced concrete A review. Cement and Concrete Research, 2009. 39(12): p. 1122-1138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Robery, P., M. Gower, and S. El-Belbol, Comparison between cathodic protection and other electrochemical repair techniques, in 7th international conference on structural faults and repair concrete and composites,. 1997. p. 231-237. [Google Scholar]
  6. Glass, G.K. and N.R. Buenfeld, On the Current-Density Required to Protect Steel in Atmospherically Exposed Concrete Structures. Corrosion Science, 1995. 37(10): p. 1643-1646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones, D.A., Application of Electrode Kinetics to Theory and Practice of Cathodic Protection. Corrosion Science, 1971. 11(6): p. 439-&. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Page, C.L. and G. Sergi, Developments in cathodic protection applied to reinforced concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2000. 12(1): p. 8-15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Glass, G.K. and J.R. Chadwick, An Investigation into the Mechanisms of Protection Afforded by a Cathodic Current and the Implications for Advances in the Field of Cathodic Protection. Corrosion Science, 1994. 36(12): p. 2193-2209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Glass, G.K., W.K. Green, and J.R. Chadwick, Long term performance of cathodic protection systems on reinforced concrete structures, in UK Corrosion 91. 1991: Manchester;UK. [Google Scholar]
  11. Presuel-Moreno, F., A.A. Sagues, and S.C. Kranc, Steel activation in concrete following interruption of long-term cathodic polarization. Corrosion, 2005. 61(5): p. 428-436. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Broomfield, J.P. and J.S. Tinnea, Cathodic protection of reinforced concrete bridge components, in Report ID No: SHRPCUWP92618,. 1992. [Google Scholar]
  13. Christodoulou, C., et al., Assessing the long term benefits of Impressed Current Cathodic Protection. Corrosion Science, 2010. 52(8): p. 2671-2679. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Law, D.W., P. Nicholls, and C. Christodoulou, Residual protection of steel following suspension of Impressed Current Cathodic Protection system on a wharf structure. Construction and Building Materials, 2019. 210: p. 48-55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. AS2832.5, AS 2328.5 Cathodic Protection of Metals; Part 5 Steel in Concrete, in 2008, Australian Standards. [Google Scholar]
  16. ISO:12696:2016, Cathodic protection of steel in concrete. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bhuiyan, M.A., et al., Investigation of Residual Protection of Steel following Application of Protective Current. Construction and Building Materials, 2018. 162: p. 503-511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.