Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 280, 2019
The 5th International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment (ICSBE 2018)
Article Number 05001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Resource Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928005001
Published online 08 May 2019
  1. V. Novotny. Water quality: diffuse pollution and watershed management. John Wiley & Sons; [2003]. [Google Scholar]
  2. T. D. Fletcher, H. Andrieu, P. Hamel. Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: A state of the art. Advances in water resources. [2013] Jan 1;51:261–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Yang, L.C. Bowling, K. A. Cherkauer, B. C. Pijanowski. The impact of urban development on hydrologic regime from catchment to basin scales. Landscape and Urban Planning. [2011] Nov 30;103[2]:237–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. L. Meierdiercks, J. A. Smith, M. L. Baeck, A. J. Miller. Analyses of Urban Drainage Network Structure and its Impact on Hydrologic Response 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. [2010] Oct;46[5]:932–43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Hamel, E. Daly, T. D. Fletcher. Source-control stormwater management for mitigating the impacts of urbanisation on baseflow: A review. Journal of Hydrology. [2013] Apr 2;485:201–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. C. M. Cianfrani, W. C. Hession, D. M. Rizzo. Watershed imperviousness impacts on stream channel condition in southeastern Pennsylvania 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. [2006] Aug;42[4]:941–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. O. Navratil, P. Breil, L. Schmitt, L. Grosprêtre, Albert MB. Hydrogeomorphic adjustments of stream channels disturbed by urban runoff [Yzeron River basin, France]. Journal of Hydrology. [2013] Apr 2;485:24–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. E. J. Nelson, D. B. Booth. Sediment sources in an urbanizing, mixed land-use watershed. Journal of Hydrology. [2002] Jul 30;264[1-4]:51–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R. O. Carey, G. J. Hochmuth, C. J. Martinez, T. H. Boyer, M. D. Dukes, G. S. Toor, J. L. Cisar. Evaluating nutrient impacts in urban watersheds: Challenges and research opportunities. Environmental Pollution. [2013] Feb 1;173:138–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. E. Hatt, A. Steinel, A. Deletic, T. D. Fletcher. Retention of heavy metals by stormwater filtration systems: breakthrough analysis. Water Science and Technology. [2011] Nov 1;64[9]:1913–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Alberti, D. Booth, K. Hill, B. Coburn, C. Avolio, S. Coe, D. Spirandelli. The impact of urban patterns on aquatic ecosystems: An empirical analysis in Puget lowland sub-basins. Landscape and urban planning. 2007 May 20;80[4]:345–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. P. Hartigan, T. F. Quasebarth, E. Southerland. Calibration of NPS model loading factors. Journal of Environmental Engineering. [1983] Dec;109[6]:1259–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. E. Line, N. M. White. Effects of development on runoff and pollutant export. Water Environment Research. [2007] Feb 1;79[2]:185–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. E. Schoonover, B. G. Lockaby. Land cover impacts on stream nutrients and fecal coliform in the lower Piedmont of West Georgia. Journal of hydrology. [2006] Dec 15;331[3-4]:371–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. G. De Stefani, D. Tocchetto, M. Salvato, M. Borin. Performance of a floating treatment wetland for in-stream water amelioration in NE Italy. Hydrobiologia. [2011] Oct 1;674[1]:157–67 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. M. Van de Moortel, G. Du Laing, N. De Pauw, F. M. Tack. The role of the litter compartment in a constructed floating wetland. Ecological engineering. [2012] Feb 1;39:71–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. T.R. Headley, C. C. Tanner. Constructed wetlands with floating emergent macrophytes: an innovative stormwater treatment technology. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. [2012] Jan 1;42[21]:2261–310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. K. E. Borne, E. A. Fassman-Beck, R. J. Winston, W. F. Hunt, C. C. Tanner. Implementation and maintenance of floating treatment wetlands for urban stormwater management. Journal of Environmental Engineering. [2015] Apr 16;141[11]:04015030. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. P. Wanielista, N. B. Chang, M. Chopra, Z. Xuan, K. Islam, and Z. Marimon. Floating wetland systems for nutrient removal in stormwater ponds. [2012]. Stormwater Management Academy. Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering Department University of Central Florida, Tallahassee, FL. [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Lane, D. Sample, A. Lazur, R. Winston, C. Streb, D. Ferrier, L. Linker, K. Brittingham, T. Schueler, C. Lane, C. S. Network. Recommendations of the Expert Panel to Define Removal Rates for Floating Treatment Wetlands in Existing Wet Ponds. [Google Scholar]
  21. K. E. Borne, C. C. Tanner, E. A. Fassman-Beck. Stormwater nitrogen removal performance of a floating treatment wetland. Water Science and Technology. [2013] Oct 1;68[7]:1657–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. K. E. Borne. Floating treatment wetland influences on the fate and removal performance of phosphorus in stormwater retention ponds. Ecological engineering. [2014] Aug 1; 69:76–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. R. J. Winston, W. F. Hunt, S. G. Kennedy, L. S. Merriman, J. Chandler, D. Brown. Evaluation of floating treatment wetlands as retrofits to existing stormwater retention ponds. Ecological Engineering. [2013] May 1; 54:254–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. P. Wanielista, N. B. Chang, M. Chopra, Z. Xuan, K. Islam, Z. Marimon. Floating wetland systems for nutrient removal in stormwater ponds. Stormwater Management Academy. Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering Department University of Central Florida, Tallahassee, FL. [2012] Sep. [Google Scholar]
  25. N. B. Chang, M. Wanielista, M. Chopra. Floating Wetland Systems for Nutrient Removal in Stormwater Ponds. [2012] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. K. Lowman. Evaluation of floating treatment wetlands in stormwater retention ponds on poultry farms to reduce nutrient loading. Towson University Institutional Repository. 2013 Feb 26. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.