Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 275, 2019
1st International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering and Materials (ACEM1) and 1st World Symposium on Sustainable Bio-composite Materials and Structures (SBMS1) (ACEM2018 and SBMS1)
Article Number 02018
Number of page(s) 5
Section New Materials and Structural Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927502018
Published online 13 March 2019
  1. Belouettar S, Abbadi A, Azari Z, Belouettar R, Freres P. Experimental investigation of static and fatigue behaviour of composites honeycomb materials using four point bending tests, Compos. Struct. 87(09) (2008) 265–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Russo A, Zuccarello B. Experimental and numerical evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of GFRP sandwich panels, Compos. Struct. 81(04) (2007) 575–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Steeves C A, Fleck N A. Collapse mechanisms of sandwich beams with composite faces and a foam core, loaded in three-point bending. Part I: analytical models and minimum weight design, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 46(04) (2004) 585-608. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hai F, Weiqing L, Li W. Mechanical Properties and Manufacturing Process of Grooved Perforation Sandwich Composites, J. Build. Mater. 4 (2008): 495-499. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fubin Z, Weiqing L, Lu W, Yujun Q, Ding Z, Hai F. Flexural behavior of hybrid composite beams with a bamboo layer and lattice ribs, J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 34(07) (2015): 521-533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Meraghni, F. Desrumaux, M.L. Benzeggagh. Mechanical behaviour of cellular core for structural sandwich panels, Compos. Part A : Appl. Sci. Manufac. 30(06) (1999) 247–253. [Google Scholar]
  7. A.G. Mamalis, K.N. Spentzas, N.G. Pantelelis, D.E. Manolakos, M.B. Ioannidis. A new hybrid concept for sandwich structures, Compos. Struct. 83(04) (2008) 335–340 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Umer R, Waggy EM, Haq M. Experimental and numerical characterizations of flexural behavior of VARTM-infused composite sandwich structures, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 31 (2012) 67–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Romanoff F, Varsta P. Bending response of webcore sandwich beams, Compos. Struct. 73(04) (2006) 478-487. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thomas K, Jan R, Julia de C. GFRP-balsa sandwich bridge deck: concept, design and experimental validation, J. Compos. Constr. 7 (2013) 3-21. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rizov V, Shipsha A, Zenkert D. Indentation study of foam core sandwich composite panels, Compos. Struct. 69(01) (2005) 95–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Borsellino C, Calabrese L, Valenza A. Experimental and numerical evaluation of sandwich composite structures, Compos. Sci. Technol. 64(10-11) (2004) 1709–1715. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pitarresi G, Carruthers JJ, Robinson AM, Torre G, Kenny JM, Ingleton S. A comparative evaluation of crashworthy composite sandwich structures, Compos. Struct. 78(01) (2007) 34–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. ASTM C393. Standard test method for flexural properties of sandwich constructions, 2000. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.