Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 273, 2019
International Cross-industry Safety Conference (ICSC) - European STAMP Workshop & Conference (ESWC) (ICSC-ESWC 2018)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 10
Section European STAMP Workshop & Conference
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927302003
Published online 22 February 2019
  1. Chatzimichailidou, M. M., & Dokas, I. M. (2015a). Introducing RiskSOAP to communicate the distributed situation awareness of a system about safety issues: an application to a robotic system. Ergonomics, 59(3), 409-422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chatzimichailidou, M. M., & Dokas, I. M. (2015b). The Risk Situation Awareness Provision Capability and its degradation in the Überlingen accident over time. Procedia Engineering, 128, 44-53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chatzimichailidou, M. M., Stanton, N. A., & Dokas, I. M. (2015). The concept of risk situation awareness provision: towards a new approach for assessing the DSA about the threats and vulnerabilities of complex socio-technical systems. Safety science, 79, 126-138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi, S. S., Cha, S. H., & Tappert, C. C. (2010). A survey of binary similarity and distance measures. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 8(1), 43-48. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dekker, S. (2012). Drift into failure: From hunting broken components to understanding complex systems. CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dokas, I. M., Feehan, J., & Imran, S. (2013). EWaSAP: An early warning sign identification approach based on a systemic hazard analysis. Safety science, 58, 11-26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. German Federal Bureau of Aircraft Accident Investigation - Bundesstelle für Flugunfalluntersuchung. (2004). BFU Überlingen Investigation Report. Reference AX001-1-2/02. [Google Scholar]
  8. IBM. (2013) SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 22.0. New York: IBM Corp. [Google Scholar]
  9. Karanikas, N., & Mikela Chatzimichailidou, M. (2018). The COSYCO Concept: an Indicator for COmparing SYstem COnfigurations. AUP Advances, 1(1), 154-174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnson, C. W. (2004). Final report: review of the BFU Überlingen accident report. Contract C/1.369/HQ/SS/04. Eurocontrol. [Google Scholar]
  11. Leveson, N. (2011). Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. MIT press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Masys, A. J. (2005). A systemic perspective of situation awareness: An analysis of the 2002 mid-air collision over ÜBerlingen, Germany. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 14(4), 548-557. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nunes, A., & Laursen, T. (2004, September). Identifying the factors that contributed to the Überlingen Midair Collision. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 195-198). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Salmon, P. M., Beanland, V., Lenneé, M. G., Filtness, A. J., & Stanton, N. A. (2013). Waiting for Warning.. In Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2013 (Vol. 403, No. 410, pp. 403-410). ROUTLEDGE in association with GSE Research. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.