Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 273, 2019
International Cross-industry Safety Conference (ICSC) - European STAMP Workshop & Conference (ESWC) (ICSC-ESWC 2018)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 13
Section International Cross-industry Safety Conference
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927301008
Published online 22 February 2019
  1. Billings, C. E., & Cheaney, E. S. (1981). Information transfer problems in the aviation system. Moffett Field, CA, United States: NASA Ames Research Center. [Google Scholar]
  2. Business Dictionary (2017). Retrieved from http://www.businessdictionary.com [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, A. D. (2004). Authoritative sensemaking in a public inquiry report. Organization Studies, 25(1), 95-112. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840604038182 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119-161. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dekker, S. (2004). Ten questions about human error: A new view of human factors and system safety. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dutch Safety Board (2010). Crashed on approach, Boeing 737-800, Amsterdam Schiphol Airport. Retrieved 2018, from https://www.onderzoeksraad.nl/en/onderzoek/1748/. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fiske, J. (1990). Introduction to communication studies (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gephart Jr, R. P. (1992). Sensemaking, communicative distortion and the logic of public inquiry legitimation. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 6(2), 115-135. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/108602669200600204 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. London, UK: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. IBM. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 22. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. [Google Scholar]
  11. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2002). CAP719: Fundamental Human Factor Concepts. ICAO. [Google Scholar]
  12. Karanikas, N., & Nederend, J. (2018). The Controllability Classification of Safety Events and its Application to Aviation Investigation Reports. Safety Science, 108, 89-103. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.025 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Luiks, H. (2016). Communicational problems in the aviation operation system (Unpublished Bachelor’s thesis, Aviation Academy Amsterdam, the Netherlands). [Google Scholar]
  14. Marko, H. (1973). The Bidirectional Communication Theory - A Generalisation of Information Theory. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-21(12), 1345-1351. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Merriam-Webster. (2017). Dictionary and thesaurus. Retrieved January 2017, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary. [Google Scholar]
  16. Microsoft. (2013). Computer Software. Excel. Washington: Microsoft Corporation. [Google Scholar]
  17. Molesworth, B. R., & Estival, D. (2015). Miscommunication in general aviation: The influence of external factors on communication errors. Safety science, 73, 73-79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Passenier, D., Mollee, J., Wolbers, J., Boersma, K., & Groenewegen, P. (2012). Formalization of Crisis Response Coordination from a Public Inquiry Report.. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management ISCRAM (ID 244). Vancouver, Canada: Simon Fraser University. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication (4th ed.). Chicago, IL, United States: University of Illinois Press. [Google Scholar]
  20. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weik, M. H. (1988). Communications standard dictionary (2nd ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics. New York: John Wiley [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.