Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 271, 2019
2019 Tran-SET Annual Conference
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 5
Section Structural
Published online 09 April 2019
  1. Lee, H., Banerjee, A., Fang, Y., Lee, B., and King, C. (2010). Design of a multifunctional wireless sensor for in situ monitoring of debris flows. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 59, 2958–2967. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Perez, C., Jimenez, M., Soto, F., Torres, R., López, J., and Iborra, A. (2011). A system for monitoring marine environments based on Wireless Sensor Networks. Santander, Spain: In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on OCEANS pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jiang, P., Xia, H., He, Z., and Wang, Z. (2009). Design of a Water Environment Monitoring System Based on Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors 2009, 9, 6411–6434. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bayo, A., Antolín, D., Medrano, N., Calvo, B., and Celma, S. (2010). Early Detection and Monitoring of Forest Fire with a Wireless Sensor Network System. Proced. Eng. 2010, 5, 248–251. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yunus, E., Ibrahim, K., and Özgür, U. (2012). A framework for use of wireless sensor networks in forest fire detection and monitoring. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2012, 36, 614–625. [Google Scholar]
  6. Silva, I., Guedes, L., Portugal, P., and Vasques, F. (2012). Reliability and Availability Evaluation of Wireless Sensor Networks for Industrial Applications. Sensors 2012, 12, 806–838. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhao, G. (2011). Wireless Sensor Networks for Industrial Process Monitoring and Control: A Survey. Netw. Protoc. Algorithms 2011, 3, 46–63. [Google Scholar]
  8. Raul, M., Samuel, G., Miguel, A., António, L., Salviano, F., Ferreira, P., and Reis, M. (2008). Sun, wind and water flow as energy supply for small stationary data acquisition platforms. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2008, 64, 120–132. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, X., Deng, Y., and Ding, L. (2008). Study on precision agriculture monitoring framework based on wsn. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Anti-counterfeiting, Security and Identification (ASID 2008). Guiyang, China. 182– 185. [Google Scholar]
  10. Qian, H., Sun, P., and Rong, Y. (2012). Design Proposal of Self-Powered WSN Node for Battle Field Surveillance. Energy Proced. 2012, 16, 753– 757. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Padmavathi, G., Shanmugapriya, D., and Kalaivani, M. (2010). A Study on Vehicle Detection and Tracking Using Wireless Sensor Networks. Wirel. Sens. Netw. Sensors 2014, 14, 16950. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tacconi, D., Miorandi, D., Carreras, I., Chiti, F., and Fantacci, R. (2010). Using wireless sensor networks to support intelligent transportation systems. Ad Hoc Netw. 2010, 8, 462–473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tubaishat, M., Zhuang, P., Qi, Q., and Shang, Y. (2009). Wireless sensor networks in intelligent transportation systems. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2009, 9, 287–302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee, H., Wu, C., and Aghajan, H. (2011). Vision-based user-centric light control for smart environments. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2011, 7, 223–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bangali, J., and Shaligram, A. (2013). Energy efficient Smart home based on Wireless Sensor Network using LabVIEW. Am. J. Eng. Res. 2013, 2, 409–413. [Google Scholar]
  16. Handcock, R., Swain, D., Bishop-Huriey, G., Patison, K., Wark, T., and Valencia, P. (2009). Monitoring Animal Behaviour and Environmental Interactions Using Wireless Sensor Networks, GPS Collars and Satellite Remote Sensing. Sensors 2009, 9, 3586–3603. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nadimi, E., Jørgensen, R. B.-V., and Christensen, S. (2012). Monitoring and classifying animal behavior using ZigBee-based mobile ad hoc wireless sensor networks and artificial neural networks. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2012, 82, 44–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bahrepour, M., Meratnia, N., Poel, M., Taghikhaki, Z., and Havinga, P. (2010). Distributed event detection in wireless sensor networks for disaster management. Thessaloniki, Greece: In Proceedings of the 2010 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCOS), 507–512. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lacono, M., Romano, E., and Marrone, S. (2010). Adaptive monitoring of marine disasters with intelligent mobile sensor networks. Taranto, Italy: In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Workshop on Environmental Energy and Structural Monitoring Systems (EESMS), 38–45. [Google Scholar]
  20. Eamon, C.D., Fitzpatrick, P., and Truax, D. D. (2007). Observations of Structural Damage Caused by Hurricane Katrina on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 21(2), 117–127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Padgett, J., DesRoches, R., Nielson, B., Yashinsky, M., Kwon, O.-S., Burdette, N., and Tavera, E. (2008). Bridge Damage and Repair Costs from Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Bridge Engineering 13(1), 6–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, Q., Wang, L., and Zhao, H. (2009). Hydrodynamic Investigation of Coastal Bridge Collapse during Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 135(3), 175–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Spencer, J.B., Sandoval, M.E., and Kurata, N. (2004). Smart Sensing Technology: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 11(4), 349–368. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Akyildiz, I., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., and Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Else Comput Netw 2002; 38, 393–422. [Google Scholar]
  25. Arduino. (2018). Arduino Uno Rev3. <> (July 26, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  26. Banzi, M., and Shiloh, M. (2015). Make: Getting Started with Arduino. Third edition. Sebastopol, CA: Maker Media. [Google Scholar]
  27. XBee, D. (2018). Digi XBee® Family Features Comparison. Retrieved from (July 28, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  28. XBee Explorer. (2018). SparkFun XBee Explorer USB. Product information retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  29. Nanotech. (2018). Turnigy nano-tech 1000mah 2S 25~50C Lipo Pack. Product information retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhi, R. (2016). A Drift Eliminated Attitude & Position Estimation Algorithm In 3D. Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. Paper 450, University of Vermont. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.