Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 270, 2019
The 2nd Conference for Civil Engineering Research Networks (ConCERN-2 2018)
Article Number 04010
Number of page(s) 6
Section Water Resources Engineering and Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927004010
Published online 22 February 2019
  1. T.Z. Ichamo, et al., River cross-section extraction from the ASTER global DEM for flood modeling, Environmental Modelling & Software, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.12.003 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Gharbi, A. Soualmia, D. Dartus, and L. Masbernat, Comparison of 1D and 2D Hydraulic Models for Floods Simulation on the Medjerda Riverin Tunisia, J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 7 (8) (2016) 3017-3026. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. V. N. Duong dan P. Gourbesville., Model Uncertainty in Flood Modelling. Case Study at Vu Gia Thu Bon Catchment - Vietnam, Procedia Engineering, Volume 154. Pages 450-458, ISSN 1877-7058. (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Kure, M. Farid, Y. Fukutani, A. Muhari, J. D. Bricker, K. Udo, and A. Mano, Several Social Factors Contributing to Floods and Characteristics of the January 2013 Flood in Jakarta, Indonesia., Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser. G (Environmental Research), vol. 70(5), pp. 211-217. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Mecke, I. Lee, J.R. Baker jr., M.M. Banaszak Holl, B.G. Orr, Deformability of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers, Eur. Phys. J. E 14, 7 (2004) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. I. K. Hadihardja, A. A. Kuntoro., dan M. Farid., Flood Resilience for Risk Management: Case Study River Basin in Indonesia, Global Aspect, vol. 3(4) pp. 16-19. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Alaghmand, R. B. Abdullah, dan I. Abustan, 2012. Comparison between capabilities of HEC-RAS and MIKE11 hydraulic models in river flood risk modelling (a case study of Sungai Kayu Ara River basin, Malaysia), Int. J. Hydrology Science and Technology, Vol. 2 No. 3. (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. I. R. Moe, S. Kure, M. Farid, K. Udo, S. Kazama, and S. Koshimura, Numerical Simulation of Flooding in Jakarta and Evaluation of a Counter Measure to Mitigate Flood Damage, Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser. G (Environmental Research), vol. 71(5), pp. 29-35. (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Maurari, R. B. Soledad, and P. John, A Comparative Study of HEC-RAS 2D, TUFLOW, & Mike 21, Wood Rogers Inc., (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Farid, A. Marlina, dan M. S. B. Kusuma, Flood Hazard Mapping of Palembang City by using 2D Model, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1903(1). 100009. 14-17 Agustus 2017, Palembang. (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. DHI, MIKE 21 & MIKE 3 Flow Model FM Hydrodynamic, and Transport Module Scientific Documentation, MIKE DHI. (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.