Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 268, 2019
The 25th Regional Symposium on Chemical Engineering (RSCE 2018)
Article Number 06019
Number of page(s) 7
Section Process for Energy and Environment
Published online 20 February 2019
  1. Moodley, I., Sheridan, C.M., Kappelmeyer, U., and Akcil, A. Environmentally sustainable acid mine drainage remediation: Research developments with a focus on waste/by-products, Minerals Engineering 1262018, 207–220. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akcil, A. and Koldas, S. Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies, Journal of Cleaner Production 14(12), 2006, 1139–1145. [Google Scholar]
  3. Marchildon, J. The UN Has Called This The Second Biggest Environmental Problem Facing Our World, Global Poverty Project, Inc 2017, . [Google Scholar]
  4. James, K.L., Randall, N.P., and Haddaway, N.R. A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences, Environmental Evidence 5(1), 2016, 7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., and Mattsson, M. Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. in: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Eval. Assess. Softw. Eng., Swindon, UK, BCS Learning & Development Ltd., pp. 68–77. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartzas, G., Komnitsas, K., and Paspaliaris, I. Laboratory evaluation of Fe0 barriers to treat acidic leachates, Minerals Engineering 19(5), 2006, 505–514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fiore, S. and Zanetti, M.C. Preliminary tests concerning zero-valent iron efficiency in inorganic pollutants remediation, American Journal of Environmental Sciences 5(4), 2009, 555–560. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liendo, M.A., Navarro-Hidalgo, G.E., Sampaio, C.H., and Heck, N.C. Synthesis of ZVI particles for acid mine drainage reactive barriers: Experimental and theoretical evaluation, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 1(2), 2012, 75–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Suponik, T. and Blanco, M. Removal of heavy metals from groundwater affected by acid mine drainage, Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing 50(1), 2014, 359–372. [Google Scholar]
  10. Suponik, T. Zero-valent iron for removal of inorganic contaminants from low pH water, Environment Protection Engineering 41(1), 2015, 15–27. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bilardi, S., Calabró, P.S., and Moraci, N. Simultaneous removal of CUII, NIII and ZNII by a granular mixture of zero-valent iron and pumice in column systems, Desalination and Water Treatment 55(3), 2015, 767–776. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hudson-Edwards, K.A. and Kossoff, D. Role of redox-reactive minerals in the reuse and remediation of mine wastes, European Mineralogical Union Notes in Mineralogy 17 2017,. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cai, C.-F., Sun, J., Luo, F.-X., He, S.-S., Hu, S.-H., and Wu, B. Effects of treatment efficiency of AMD through the PRB based on different structure of MFC, Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society 41(5), 2016, 1301–1308. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tang, H., Pu, W.-C., Cai, C.-F., Xu, J.-P., and He, W.-J. Remediation of acid mine drainage based on a novel coupled membrane-free microbial fuel cell with permeable reactive barrier system, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 25(1), 2016, 107–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Place, D.L., Figueroa, L., Wildeman, T., and Reisman, D. Characterizing and tracking reactive mixture alterations: New tools for passive treatment system design and monitoring. in: 7th Int. Conf. Acid Rock Drain. 2006, ICARD -Also Serves as 23rd Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Min. Reclam., pp. 1605–1619. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mayer, K.U., Benner, S.G., and Blowes, D.W. Process-based reactive transport modeling of a permeable reactive barrier for the treatment of mine drainage, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 85(3–4), 2006, 195–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pereyra, L.P., Hanson, R., Hiibel, S., Pruden, A., and Reardon, K.F. Comparison of inocula applied in the remediation of acid mine drainage by sulfate reduction. in: 22nd Am. Soc. Min. Reclam. Annu. Natl. Conf. 2005, pp. 894–903. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pruden, A., Hong, H.S., Inman, L.Y., Logan, M. V, Sans, C., Ahmann, D., et al. Microbial characterization of sulfate-reducing columns remediating acid mine drainage. in: 22nd Am. Soc. Min. Reclam. Annu. Natl. Conf. 2005, pp. 935–944. [Google Scholar]
  19. Place, D.L., Claveau, E., and Figueroa, L. Tracking organic substrate alterations in passive reactive zones for planning and monitoring. in: 22nd Am. Soc. Min. Reclam. Annu. Natl. Conf. 2005, pp. 921–934. [Google Scholar]
  20. Logan, M. V, Reardon, K.F., Figueroa, L.A., McLain, J.E.T., and Ahmann, D.M. Microbial community activities during establishment, performance, and decline of bench-scale passive treatment systems for mine drainage, Water Research 39(18), 2005, 4537–4551. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hemsi, P.S., Shackelford, C.D., and Figueroa, L.A. Modeling the influence of decomposing organic solids on sulfate reduction rates for iron precipitation, Environmental Science and Technology 39(9), 2005, 3215–3225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Amos, R.T., Mayer, K.U., Blowes, D.W., and Ptacek, C.J. Reactive transport modeling of column experiments for the remediation of acid mine drainage, Environmental Science and Technology 38(11), 2004, 3131–3138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibert, O., de Pablo, J., Cortina, J.L., and Ayora, C. Treatment of acid mine drainage by sulphate-reducing bacteria using permeable reactive barriers: A review from laboratory to full-scale experiments, Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 1(4), 2002, 327–333. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Waybrant, K.R., Ptacek, C.J., and Blowes, D.W. Treatment of mine drainage using permeable reactive barriers: Column experiments, Environmental Science and Technology 36(6), 2002, 1349–1356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mattos, R.C., Hemsi, P.S., Kawachi, E.Y., and Silva, F.T. Use of sugarcane bagasse as carbon substrate in permeable reactive barriers: Laboratory batch tests and mathematical modeling, Soils and Rocks 38(3), 2015, 219–229. [Google Scholar]
  26. Herbert Jr., R.B., Benner, S.G., and Blowes, D.W. Reactive barrier treatment of groundwater contaminated by acid mine drainage: Sulphur accumulation and sulphide formation, IAHS-AISH Publication (250), 1998, 451–457. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pereyra, L.P., Hiibel, S.R., Perrault, E.M., Reardon, K.F., and Pruden, A. Effect of bioaugmentation and biostimulation on sulfate-reducing column startup captured by functional gene profiling, FEMS Microbiology Ecology 82(1), 2012, 135–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kijjanapanich, P., Pakdeerattanamint, K., Lens, P.N.L.L., and Annachhatre, A.P. Organic substrates as electron donors in permeable reactive barriers for removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage, Environmental Technology (United Kingdom) 33(23), 2012, 2635–2644. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang, H.-Y., Wang, B., Dong, X.-L., Fan, Z.-M., and Ju, Y.-Y. Feasibility of sewage sludge used as filling material in permeable reactive barrier, Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science 31(5), 2010, 1280–1286. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pereyra, L.P., Hiibel, S.R., Pruden, A., and Reardon, K.F. Comparison of microbial community composition and activity in sulfate-reducing batch systems remediating mine drainage, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 101(4), 2008, 702–713. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pruden, A., Pereyra, L.P., Hiibel, S.R., Inman, L.Y., Kashani, N., Reardon, K.F., et al. Microbiology of sulfate-reducing passive treatment systems. in: 7th Int. Conf. Acid Rock Drain. 2006, ICARD -Also Serves as 23rd Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Min. Reclam., pp. 1620–1631. [Google Scholar]
  32. Williams, R.L., Mayer, K.U., Amos, R.T., Blowes, D.W., Ptacek, C.J., and Bain, J.G. Using dissolved gas analysis to investigate the performance of an organic carbon permeable reactive barrier for the treatment of mine drainage, Applied Geochemistry 22(1), 2007, 90–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hemsi, P.S., Shackelford, C.D., and Figueroa, L.A. Modeling bioremediation of acid mine drainage in permeable reactive. in: 5th ICEG Environ. Geotech. Oppor. Challenges Responsib. Environ. Geotech. -Proc. ISSMGE 5th Int. Congr., pp. 901–908. [Google Scholar]
  34. Conca, J.L. and Wright, J. An Apatite II permeable reactive barrier to remediate groundwater containing Zn, Pb and Cd, Applied Geochemistry 21(8), 2006, 1288–1300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wright, J. and Conca, J.L. Remediation of groundwater contaminated with ZN, PB and CD using a permeable reactive barrier with Apatite II. in: 7th Int. Conf. Acid Rock Drain. 2006, ICARD -Also Serves as 23rd Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Min. Reclam., pp. 2514–2527. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ekolu, S.O., Azene, F.Z., and Diop, S. A concrete reactive barrier for acid mine drainage treatment, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Water Management 167(7), 2014, 373–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, J., He, L., Dong, F., and Hudson-Edwards, K.A. The role of nano-sized manganese coatings on bone char in removing arsenic(V) from solution: Implications for permeable reactive barrier technologies, Chemosphere 1532016, 146–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fedoročková, A., Sučik, G., and Raschman, P. Activated Zeolite and Magnesite as Potential Reactive Materials for Passive Acidic Groundwater Treatment Technology, Solid State Phenomena 2442015, 221–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, J., Zhou, L., Dong, F., and Hudson-Edwards, K.A. Enhancing As(V) adsorption and passivation using biologically formed nano-sized FeS coatings on limestone: Implications for acid mine drainage treatment and neutralization, Chemosphere 1682017, 529–538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lapointe, F., Fytas, K., and McConchie, D. Efficiency of BauxsolTM in permeable reactive barriers to treat acid rock drainage, Mine Water and the Environment 25(1), 2006, 37–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Penney, K., Mohamedelhassan, E., and Catalan, L.J.J. Utilization of coal/biomass fly ash in reactive barriers for treating acid mine drainage. in: Proc. IASTED Int. Conf. Environ. Manag. Eng. EME 2009, pp. 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pérez-López, R., Cama, J., Miguel Nieto, J., Ayora, C., and Saaltink, M.W. Attenuation of pyrite oxidation with a fly ash pre-barrier: Reactive transport modelling of column experiments, Applied Geochemistry 24(9), 2009, 1712–1723. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lapointe, F., Fytas, K., and McConchie, D. Using permeable reactive barriers for the treatment of acid rock drainage, International Journal of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Environment 19(1), 2005, 57–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Koshy, N. and Singh, D.N. Fly ash zeolites for water treatment applications, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 4(2), 2016, 1460–1472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Blowes, D.W., Ptacek, C.J., Benner, S.G., McRae, C.W.T., Bennett, T.A., and Puls, R.W. Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 45(1–2), 2000, 123–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Amos, P.W. and Younger, P.L. Substrate characterisation for a subsurface reactive barrier to treat colliery spoil leachate, Water Research 37(1), 2003, 108–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Vestola, E.A. Testing of different substrate materials for sulphate reducing reactive barrier to treat acid mine drainage, Advanced Materials Research 71–732009, 573–576. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gibert, O., Rötting, T., Cortina, J.L., de Pablo, J., Ayora, C., Carrera, J., et al. In-situ remediation of acid mine drainage using a permeable reactive barrier in Aznalcóllar (Sw Spain), Journal of Hazardous Materials 191(1–3), 2011, 287–295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pagnanelli, F., De Michelis, I., Di Tommaso, M., Ferella, F., Toro, L., and Vegliò, F. Treatment of acid mine drainage by a combined chemical/biological column apparatus: Mechanisms of heavy metal removal. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2008. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gibert, O., Cortina, J.L., and Pablo, J.D. Evaluation of sheep manure for In-Situ acid mine drainage treatment. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2012. [Google Scholar]
  51. Jeen, S.-W. and Mattson, B. Evaluation of layered and mixed passive treatment systems for acid mine drainage, Environmental Technology (United Kingdom) 37(22), 2016, 2835–2851. [Google Scholar]
  52. Huang, J., Zuo, D., and Yue, M. Techniques to treat acid mine drainage: A review. in: Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Environ. Technol. Knowl. Transf., Hefei University, pp. 147–153. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pérez, N., Schwarz, A.O., Barahona, E., Sanhueza, P., Diaz, I., and Urrutia, H. Performance of two differently designed permeable reactive barriers with sulfate and zinc solutions, Science of the Total Environment 6422018, 894–903. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Beiyuan, J., Tsang, D.C.W., Yip, A.C.K., Zhang, W., Ok, Y.S., and Li, X.-D. Risk mitigation by waste-based permeable reactive barriers for groundwater pollution control at e-waste recycling sites, Environmental Geochemistry and Health 39(1), 2017, 75–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhou, L., Dong, F., Liu, J., and Hudson-Edwards, K.A. Coupling effect of Fe3+(aq) and biological, nano-sized FeS-coated limestone on the removal of redox-sensitive contaminants (As, Sb and Cr): Implications for in situ passive treatment of acid mine drainage, Applied Geochemistry 802017, 102–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Jeen, S.-W., Bain, J.G., and Blowes, D.W. Evaluation of mixtures of peat, zero-valent iron and alkalinity amendments for treatment of acid rock drainage, Applied Geochemistry 432014, 66–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Gibert, O., Cortina, J.L., de Pablo, J., and Ayora, C. Performance of a field-scale permeable reactive barrier based on organic substrate and zero-valent iron for in situ remediation of acid mine drainage, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 20(11), 2013, 7854–7862. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Shabalala, A.N. Assessment of locally available reactive materials for use in permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) in remediating acid mine drainage, Water SA 39(2), 2013, 251–256. [Google Scholar]
  59. Gibert, O., De Pablo, J., Cortina, J.L., and Ayora, C. Evaluation of municipal compost/limestone/iron mixtures as filling material for permeable reactive barriers for in-situ acid mine drainage treatment, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 78(5), 2003, 489–496. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Pérez, N.R., Schwarz, A.O., and Urrutia, H. Treatment of acid mine drainage: Study of sulphate reduction in organic mixtures. [Tratamiento del drenaje ácido de minas: estudio de reducción de sulfato en mezclas orgánicas], Tecnologia y Ciencias Del Agua 8(1), 2017, 63–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Di, J., Jiang, F., Zhu, Z., Dai, N., and Guo, X. In-situ restoration of acid mine drainage by PRB cooperated with Fe0 and biological maifan stone, Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering 8(12), 2014, 5111–5116. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ardau, C., Lattanzi, P., Peretti, R., and Zucca, A. Chemical stabilization of metals in mine wastes by transformed red mud and other iron compounds: Laboratory tests, Environmental Technology (United Kingdom) 35(24), 2014, 3060–3073. [Google Scholar]
  63. Xu, Z., Wu, Y., and Yu, F. A Three-Dimensional Flow and Transport Modeling of an Aquifer Contaminated by Perchloroethylene Subject to Multi-PRB Remediation, Transport in Porous Media 91(1), 2012, 319–337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Guo, Q. and Blowes, D.W. Biogeochemistry of two types of permeable reactive barriers, organic carbon and iron-bearing organic carbon for mine drainage treatment: Column experiments, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 107(3–4), 2009, 128–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sasaki, K., Nukina, S., Wilopo, W., and Hirajima, T. Removal of arsenate in acid mine drainage by a permeable reactive barrier bearing granulated blast furnace slag: Column study, Materials Transactions 49(4), 2008, 835–844. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sasaki, K., Blowes, D.W., and Ptacek, C.J. Spectroscopic study of precipitates formed during removal of selenium from mine drainage spiked with selenate using permeable reactive materials, Geochemical Journal 42(3), 2008, 283–294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.