Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 268, 2019
The 25th Regional Symposium on Chemical Engineering (RSCE 2018)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 5
Section Computer-Aided Process Engineering/Process Systems Engineering
Published online 20 February 2019
  1. Metz, B., IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. 2005, United States of America: Cambridge University Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  2. Han, K., et al., Current status and challenges of the ammonia-based CO2 capture technologies toward commercialization. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013. 14: p. 270–281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, K., et al., Systematic study of aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA)-based CO2 capture process: Techno-economic assessment of the MEA process and its improvements. Applied Energy, 2016. 165: p. 648–659. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Olajire, A.A., CO2 capture by aqueous ammonia process in the clean development mechanism for Nigerian oil industry. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2013. 7(3): p. 366–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Resnik, K.P., J.T. Yeh, and H.W. Pennline, Aqua ammonia process for simultaneous removal of CO2, SO2 and NOx. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 2004. 4(1-2): p. 89–104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jilvero, H., et al., Heat requirement for regeneration of aqueous ammonia in post-combustion carbon dioxide capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012. 11: p. 181–187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, K., Experimental and Modelling Study of Advanced Aqueous Ammonia Based Post Combustion Capture Process, in Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. 2016, Curtin University: Australia. p. 213. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jilvero, H., Ammonia as an Absorbent of Carbon Dioxide in Post-Combustion Capture in Department of Energy and Environment. 2014, CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY: Gothenburg, Sweeden. p. 68. [Google Scholar]
  9. Le Moullec, Y., et al., Process modifications for solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014. 31(Supplement C): p. 96–112. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cousins, A., et al., Model verification and evaluation of the rich‐split process modification at an Australian‐based post combustion CO2 capture pilot plant. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2012. 2(5): p. 329–345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Xue, B., et al., A comparative study of MEA and DEA for post-combustion CO2 capture with different process configurations. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2017. 4(1): p. 15–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yeh, A.C. and H. Bai, Comparison of ammonia and monoethanolamine solvents to reduce CO2 greenhouse gas emissions. Science of The Total Environment, 1999. 228(2): p. 121–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. McLarnon, C.R. and J.L. Duncan, Testing of Ammonia Based CO2 Capture with Multi-Pollutant Control Technology. Energy Procedia, 2009. 1(1): p. 1027–1034. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dubois, L. and D. Thomas, Simulations of various Configurations of the Post-combustion CO2 Capture Process Applied to a Cement Plant Flue Gas: Parametric Study with Different Solvents. Energy Procedia, 2017. 114: p. 1409–1423. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cousins, A., L.T. Wardhaugh, and P.H.M. Feron, Preliminary analysis of process flow sheet modifications for energy efficient CO2 capture from flue gases using chemical absorption. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2011. 89(8): p. 1237–1251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Satish Reddy, J.G., Valerie Francuz Integrated compressor/stripper configurations and methods, F.T. Corp, Editor. 2007: US. [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Le. Moullec, T.N., Absorption-Based Post-Combustion Capture of Carbon Dioxide. 1st Edition ed. 2016: Elsevier. 814. [Google Scholar]
  18. Le Moullec, Y. and M. Kanniche, Screening of flowsheet modifications for an efficient monoethanolamine (MEA) based post-combustion CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011. 5(4): p. 727–740. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.