Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 262, 2019
64 Scientific Conference of the Committee for Civil Engineering of the Polish Academy of Sciences and the Science Committee of the Polish Association of Civil Engineers (PZITB) (KRYNICA 2018)
Article Number 05018
Number of page(s) 6
Section Transportation Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201926205018
Published online 30 January 2019
  1. Jamroz i in. Ochrona pieszych. Podręcznik dla organizatorów ruchu pieszego. KRBRD (2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. Hamed M.M. Analysis of pedestrians’ behavior at pedestrian crossings. Safety Science, Volume 38, Issue 1, June 2001, Pages 63–82 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Basile O., Persia L., Usami D.S. A methodology to assess pedestrian crossing safety. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2: 129–137 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Asadi-Shekari Z., Moeinaddini M., Zaly Shah M. Pedestrian safety index for evaluating street facilities in urban areas. Safety Science 74, pp. 1–14 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. www.etsc.eu [Google Scholar]
  6. Lexman K.K., Rastogi R., Chandra S. Pedestrian flow characteristics in mixed traffic conditions. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2010, 136(1), pp. 23–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lam W.H.K., Lee J.Y.S., Cheung C.Y. A study of the bi-directional pedestrian flow characteristics at Hong Kong signalized crosswalks facilities, Transportation, 29, pp. 169–192 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lipovac K., Vujanic M., Maric B. et al. Pedestrian behaviour at signalized pedestrian crossings. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 139(2), pp. 165–172 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fontain H., Gourlet Y. Fatal pedestrian accidents in France: A typological analysis, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Volume 29, Issue 3, May 1997, Pages 303–312 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zegeer C.V. How to develop a pedestrian safety action plan. Final report. Washington, D.C., Federal Highway Administration, 2009 (FHWA-SA-05–12). [Google Scholar]
  11. Pesić D., Antić B., Glavić D., Milenković M. The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at unsignalized intersections – Models for predicting unsafe pedestrians behaviour, Safety Science, Volume 82, February 2016, Pages 1–8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jamroz K., Kaczmarek J. Jak zmniejszyć poziom ryzyka pieszych w ruchu drogowym w Polsce, Transport Miejski i Regionalny, 07-08/2006, pp. 40–47 [Google Scholar]
  13. Tomczuk P.: Bezpieczeństwo pieszych pomiary luminancji na przejściu dla pieszych, Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej, Transport, Badania Środków i Systemów Transportowych, z. 80, str.117–135, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. Jamroz K. i inni: Metodologia systematycznych badań zachowań pieszych i relacji pieszy-kierowca wraz z przeprowadzeniem badań pilotażowych. Etap I. www.krbrd.gov.pl, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Olszewski P. [et al.]: Pedestrian safety assessment with video analysis, in: Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 14, 2016, pp. 2044–2053. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosén, E., and U. Sander. Pedestrian Fatality Risk as a Function of Car Impact Speed. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, pp. 536–542 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gaca s., Kiec M. Assessment of Pedestrian Risk at Crossings with Kinematic–Probabilistic Model, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015, Volume 2514, Pages: 129–137 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gaca S. Badania prędkości pojazdów i jej wpływ na bezpieczeństwo ruchu drogowego, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Krakowskiej, Nr 75, Kraków (2002) [Google Scholar]
  19. Ziolkowski R. Influence of traffic calming measures on drivers’ behaviour, 9th International Conference: Environmental engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Press Technika (2014) [Google Scholar]
  20. U.K. Department of Transportation. Killing Speed and Saving Lives. U.K. Department of Transportation, London (1987) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.