Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2019
International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering Structures and Construction Materials (SCESCM 2018)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Forensic Engineering, Structural Health Monitoring System, Assessment and Retrofitting, Disaster Mitigation and Restoration
Published online 25 January 2019
  1. J. Douglas, “Building performance and its relevance to facilities management”. Facilities., 14, 23–32. MCB University Press. ISSN 0263-2772. (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clift, M. and Butler, R., The Performance and Cost-inuse of Buildings: A New Approach, BRE Report, Building Research Establishment, Garston, 3. (1995) [Google Scholar]
  3. Williams, B., “What a performance!” (Editorial), Property Management, 11, 190–91. (1993) [Google Scholar]
  4. E. J. Gibson, Working with the Performance Approach in Building. CIB Report Publication 64. Rotterdam, The Netherlands. CIB (International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction), (1982). [Google Scholar]
  5. G.R. Abbott, J.J. Mc Duling, S. Dr Parsons, And J.C. Schoeman, ‘Building Condition Assessment: A Performance Evaluation Tool towards Sustainable Management’. CIB Building Congress 2007. (2007). [Google Scholar]
  6. R. N. Wahida, G. Milton, N. Hamadan, N. M. I. B. N. Lah, &, A. H. Mohammed, Building Condition Assessment Imperative and Process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65 (ICIBSoS), 775–780. (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. S. Ahluwalia, “A framework for efficient condition assessment of the building infrastructure.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  8. B. T. Lewis, and R. P. Payant, Facility Inspection Field Manual: A Complete Condition Assessment Guide, McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A. (2000). [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Rugless, Condition Assessment Surveys, Facilities Engineering Journal, 21(3). 11–13. (1993). [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Y. Shahin, 20 Years Experiences in the PAVER Pavement Management System: Development and Implementation, Pavement Management Implementation, Editors: F.B. Holt and W.L. Gramling, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA. (1992). [Google Scholar]
  11. D. R. Uzarski, and L. A. Burley, Assessing Building Condition by the Use of Condition Indexes, Proceedings of Infrastructure Condition Assessment, Art, Science and Practice, ASCE, Boston, 365–374. (1997). [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Straub, Using a Condition Dependent Approach to Maintenance to Control Costs and Performances, Journal of Facilities Management, 1, 380–395. (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Strong, Making the Case for Facility Condition Assessment, The Three W’s, CEFPI 2004 Annual, International Conference, Burgess Carter, U.S.A. (2004). [Google Scholar]
  14. D. R. Uzarski, Condition Assessment Manual for Building Components, for Use with BUILDER Version 2.1, (2002) [Google Scholar]
  15. D. T. Mckay, K. L. Rens, L. F. Greimann, and J. H. Stecker, Condition index assessment for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works. (1999). [Google Scholar]
  16. A. A. M. Elhakeem, An asset management framework for educational buildings with life-cycle cost analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada (2005). [Google Scholar]
  17. Builder, BUILDER user guide, U.S. Army, Engineering Research and Development Centre, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (ERDC-CERL), Champaign, IL. (2002). [Google Scholar]
  18. I. Gozhali, Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program AMOS 21.0, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang (2013) [in Indonesian] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Eweda, T. Zayed, & S. Alkass, Space-Based Condition Assessment Model for Buildings: Case Study of Educational Buildings. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 29, 4014032. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.