Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2019
International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering Structures and Construction Materials (SCESCM 2018)
Article Number 02024
Number of page(s) 7
Section Construction Management, Construction Method and System, Optimization and Innovation in Structural Design
Published online 25 January 2019
  1. S. Epifany, J. Scopacasa, Indonesia’s Construction Market to Grow 8% in 2017 (Tarsus Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2017), available from: (Accessed on 20 Feb 2018). [Google Scholar]
  2. Kementrian Keuangan Republik Indonesia, APBN 2018 (Kementrian Keuangan Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2018), available from: (Accessed on 4 April 2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. Indonesian Government, Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 50 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penerapan Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (Indonesian Government, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, Angka Kasus Kecelakaan Kerja Menurun. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan (Indonesian Government, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  5. M.N. Rochmi, Kecelakaan kerja sektor konstruksi paling tinggi, Jakarta, Indonesia (2016), available from: (Accessed on 15 Aug 2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. R.A. Musa, A. Fadhli, Y. Kusminanti, D. Erwandi, F. Lestari, Behaviour intention analysis among workers at oil and gas company, SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, 20-22 October, Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia (2015). [Google Scholar]
  7. P.X.W Zou, R.Y. Sunindijo, Strategic Safety Management in Construction and Engineering. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester, UK, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Dedobbeleer, F. Beland, Is risk perception one of the dimensions of safety climate? In: A. Feyer, A. Williamson (Eds.), Occupational Injury: Risk Prevention and Intervention, pp. 73–81 (Taylor & Francis, London, UK, 1998). [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Mohamed, Safety climate in construction site environments, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128, 5, 375–384 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Davies, R. Spencer, K. Dooley, Summary Guide to Safety Climate Tools (HSE Books, Norwich, UK, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Seo, M. Torabi, E. Blair, N. Ellis, A cross-validation of safety climate scale using confirmatory factor analytic approach, Journal of Safety Research, 35, 4, 427–445 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Zohar, Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications, Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 1, 96–102 (1980). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. B.F. Mufiiz, J.M. Montes-Peon, C.J. Vazquez-Ordas, Safety culture: Analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions, Journal of Safety Research, 38, 6, 627–641 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Health and Safety Executive, A Review of Safety Culture and Safety Climate Literature for the Development of the Safety Culture Inspection Toolkit (HSE Books, Bristol, UK, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  15. M.D. Cooper, Towards a model of safety culture, Safety Science, 36, 2, 111–136 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. F.W. Guldenmund, The nature of safety culture: A review of theory and research, Safety Science, 34, 13, 215–257 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J.M. Beus, S.C. Payne, W. Arthur, Jr., G.J. Muñoz, The Development and Validation of a Cross-Industry Safety Climate Measure: Resolving Conceptual and Operational Issues. Journal of Management, DOI10.1177/0149206317745596 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Clarke, Safety climate in an automobile manufacturing plant: The effects of work environment, job communication and safety attitudes on accidents and unsafe behaviour, Personnel Review, 35, 4, 413–430 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Neal, M.A. Griffin, P.M. Hart, The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behaviour, Safety Science, 34, 1-3, 99–109 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A.M. Williamson, A. Feyer, D. Cairns, D. Biancotti, The development of a measure of safety climate: The role of safety perceptions and attitudes, Safety Science, 25, 1-3, 15–27 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Andi, Construction workers perceptions towards safety culture, Civil Engineering Dimension, 10, 1, 1–6 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  22. R.A. Machfudiyanto, Y. Latief, Y. Yogiswara, R.M.F. Setiawan, Structural equation model to investigate the dimensions influencing safety culture improvement in construction sector: A case in Indonesia, AUO Conference Proceedings, 1855, 030019 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. I.Z. Sutalaksana, D.H. Syaifullah, Factors influencing Indonesian construction workers safety behavior based on Seo’s model, The 9th Southeast Asian Ergonomics Society Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 22-24 October (2008). [Google Scholar]
  24. T.S. Irawadi, Structural equation modelling of climate safety and personal competency against the safe behaviour and its implications on the performance of construction projects, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 6, 4, 72–81 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Johns, One size doesn’t fit all: Selecting response scales for attitude items. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 15, 2, 237–264 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. The Australia Indonesia Partnership for Economic Governance (AIPEG), the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and Monash University, Women’s Economic Participation in Indonesia, AIPEG, Australia (2017). [Google Scholar]
  27. A.P.C. Chan, D. Scott, A.P.L. Chan, Factors affecting the success of a construction project, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130, 1, 153–155 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. E. Mirza, N. Ehsan, Quantification of project execution complexity and its effect on performance of infrastructure development projects, Engineering Management Journal, 29, 2, 108–123 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Soekiman, K.S. Pribadi, B.W. Soemardi, R.D. Wirahadikusumah, Factors relating to labor productivity affecting the project schedule performance in Indonesia, Procedia Engineering, 14, 865–873 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.