Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 255, 2019
Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence Conference 2018 (EAAIC 2018)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 6
Section Smart Manufacturing and Industrial 4.0
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925502007
Published online 16 January 2019
  1. Muguntan Vanar, Ruben Sario, Lee S. Strong earthquake strikes Sabah. The Star Online. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/06/05/sabah-quake/. Published June 5, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sario R. Sabah shaken by quake off Philippines. The Star Online. http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/01/10/sabah-shaken-by-quake/. Published January 10, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. Siyahi B, Cetin KO, Unutmaz B, et al. The Effects of Site and Soil Conditions To the Earthquake Damage?: Oct, 23 2011 Van-Tabanl? Earthquake (M w = 7. 2). 2012. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fredlund DG, Houston SL, Nguyen Q, Fredlund MD. Moisture Movement Through Cracked Clay Soil Profiles. Geotech Geol Eng. 2010;28(6):865–888. doi:10.1007/s10706-010-9349-x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Krisnanto S, Rahardjo H, Fredlund DG, Leong EC. Mapping of cracked soils and lateral water flow characteristics through a network of cracks. Eng Geol. 2014;172:12–25. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.01.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carminati A, Kaestner A, Lehmann P, Flühler H. Unsaturated water flow across soil aggregate contacts. Adv Water Resour. 2008;31(9):1221–1232. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.01.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Taslagyan KA, Chan DH, Morgenstern NR. Effect of vibration on the critical state of dry granular soils. Granul Matter. 2015;17(6):687–702. doi:10.1007/s10035-015-0589-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Figure S. No Title No Title_2015. 2012;(c). doi:10.15713/ins.mmj.3 [Google Scholar]
  9. Li X, Zhang LM. Characterization of dual-structure pore-size distribution of soil. Can Geotech J. 2009;46(2):129–141. doi:10.1139/T08-110 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. El-Zein A, Carter JP, Airey DW. Three-dimensional finite elements for the analysis of soil contamination using a multiple-porosity approach. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech. 2006;30(7):577–597. doi:10.1002/nag.491 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lewandowska J, Szymkiewicz A, Gorczewska W, Vauclin M. Infiltration in a double-porosity medium: Experiments and comparison with a theoretical model. Water Resour Res. 2005;41(2):1–14. doi:10.1029/2004WR003504 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lakeland DL, Rechenmacher A, Ghanem R. Towards a complete model of soil liquefaction: The importance of fluid flow and grain motion. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014;470(2165). doi:10.1098/rspa.2013.0453 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Barcelona MJ, Kim M, Masciopinto C, Mantia R La. A Gypsum-Barrier Design to Stop Seawater Intrusion in a Fractured Aquifer at Salento (Southern Italy). 2006:263–272. [Google Scholar]
  14. Valliappan S, Khalili-Naghadeh N. Flow through Fissured Porous Media with Deformable Matrix. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1990;29(August 1989):1079–1094. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Luckhaus S, Mikeli A. Bourgeat, luckhaus:,. 1996;27(6):1520–1543. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pao WKS, Lewis RW. Three-dimensional finite element simulation of three-phase flow in a deforming fissured reservoir. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2002;191(23-24):2631–2659. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00420-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ryzhik V. Spreading of a NAPL lens in a double-porosity medium. Comput Geosci. 2007;11(1):1–8. doi:10.1007/s10596-006-9040-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kamaruddin SA, Sulaiman WNA, Rahman NA, Zakaria MP, Mustaffar M, Sa’ari R. A review hydrocarbon migration.pdf. 2011:191–214. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kamaruddin SA, Sulaiman WNA, Zakaria MP, Othman R, Rahman NA. Laboratory simulation of LNAPL spills and remediation in unsaturated porous media using the image analysis technique: A review. 2011 Natl Postgrad Conf. 2011:1–7. doi:10.1109/NatPC.2011.6136348 [Google Scholar]
  20. Sa’ari R, Rahman NA, Latif Abdul NH, et al. Application Of Digital Image Processing Technique In Monitoring LNAPL Migration In Double Porosity Soil Column. J Teknol. 2015;3(72):23–29. doi:10.11113/jt.v72.4018 [Google Scholar]
  21. Foong LK, Rahman NA, Ramli MZ. A Laboratory Study of Vibration Effect for Deformable Double-Porosity Soil with Different Moisture Content. 2016;222(3):207–222. [Google Scholar]
  22. Housner GW. Geotechnical Problems of Destructive Earthquakes. Géotechnique. 1954;4(4):153–162. doi:10.1680/geot.1954.4.4.153 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ndoj A, Shkodrani N, Hajdari V. Liquefaction-Induced Ground Deformations Evaluation Based on Cone Penetration Tests (CPT). World J Eng Technol. 2014;(November):249–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meehan CL, Brandon TL, Duncan JM. Measuring “fast” shear strengths along slickensided surfaces in the Bromhead ring shear. Geotech Test J. 2008;31(3):239–242. doi:10.1520/GTJ101325 [Google Scholar]
  25. Wartman J, Seed RB, Bray JD. Shaking Table Modeling of Seismically Induced Deformations in Slopes. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng. 2005;131(5):610–622. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:5(610) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bagherieh AR, Khalili N, Habibagahi G, Ghahramani A. Drying response and effective stress in a double porosity aggregated soil. Eng Geol. 2009;105(1-2):44–50. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.12.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.