Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 254, 2019
XXIII Polish-Slovak Scientific Conference on Machine Modelling and Simulations (MMS 2018)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 13
Section Methods and Systems in Machine Design
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925401013
Published online 15 January 2019
  1. www.prusa3d.com, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. http://reprap.org/, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Cantrell et al., Experimental Characterization of the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed ABS and Polycarbonate Parts. In: Yoshida S., Lamberti L., Sciammarella C. (eds) Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Dižo, M. Blatnický, B. Skočilasová, Computational modelling of the rail vehicle multibody system including flexible bodies. Communications Scientific letters of the University of Žilina 17 (3), 31-36 (2015), ISSN 1335-4205 [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Lack, J. Gerlici, Modified strip method utilization for wheel/rail contact stress evaluation. 9th International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems, CM 2012, Chengdu, China, 87-89 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Lack, J. Gerlici, Contact area and normal stress determination on railway wheel/rail contact. Communications Scientific letters of the University of Žilina 7 (2), 38-45 (2005), ISSN 1335-4205 [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Lack, J. Gerlici, Wheel/rail contact stress evaluation by means of the modified strip method. Communications Scientific letters of the University of Žilina, 15 (3), 126-132 (2013), ISSN 1335-4205 [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Gerlici, T. Lack, Rail vehicles brake components test bench utilisation. Applied mechanics and materials 486, 379-386 (2014), ISSN 1660-9336 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Blatnický, M. Štauderová, J. Dižo, Numerical analysis of the structure girder for vehicle axle scale calibration. Procedia Engineering 177, 510-515 (2017), ISSN 1877-7058 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Dižo, S. Steišunas, M. Blatnický, Vibration analysis of a coach with the wheel-flat due to suspension parameters changes. Procedia Engineering 192, 107-112 (2017), ISSN 1877-7058 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Gerlici, M. Gorbunov, K. Kravchenko, R. Domin, M. Kovtanets, T. Lack, Slipping and skidding occurrence probability decreasing by means of the friction controlling in the wheel-braking pad and wheel-rail contacts. Manufacturing technology 17 (2), 179-186 (2017), ISSN 1213-2489 [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Lack, J. Gerlici, Wheel/rail tangential contact stress evaluation by means of the modified strip method. Communications Scientific letters of the University of Žilina 6 (3a), 33-39 (2014), ISSN 1335-4205 [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Gerlici, T. Lack, Modified HHT method for vehicle vibration analysis in time domain utilisation. Applied mechanics and materials 486, 396-405 (2014), ISSN 1660-9336 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Blatnický, M. Štauderová, J. Dižo, Numerical analysis of the structure girder for vehicle axle scale calibration. Procedia Engineering 177, 510-515 (2017), ISSN 1877-7058 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Gerlici, T. Lack, Rail vehicles brake components test bench utilisation. Applied mechanics and materials 486, 379-386 (2014), ISSN 1660-9336 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Baran, M. Brezáni, P. Kukuča, P. Šťastniak, Basic dynamical analysis and comparison of balancing systems of non-conventional piston machine FIK. Procedia Engineering. ISSN 1877-7058. Vol. 192, pp. 34-39 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Baran, P. Šťastniak, P. Kukuča, M. Brezáni, Investigation of kinematic parameters of two nonconventional piston machines with wobble board. MATEC Web of conferences. ISSN 2261-236X. Vol. 157 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Gerlici, T. Lack, Contact geometry influence on the rail / wheel surface stress distribution. Procedia Engineering 2 (1) 2249-2257 (2010), ISSN 1877-7058 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Gerlici, T. Lack, Contact geometry influence on the rail / wheel surface stress distribution. Procedia Engineering 2 (1), 2249-2257 (2010), ISSN 1877-7058 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Lack, J. Gerlici, Wheel/rail tangential contact stress evaluation by means of the modified strip method. Communications Scientific letters of the University of Žilina 6 (3a), 33-39 (2014), ISSN 1335-4205 [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Lack, J. Gerlici, A modified strip method to speed up the calculation of normal stress between wheel and rail. Applied mechanics and materials 486, 359-370 (2014), ISSN 1660-9336 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Lack, J. Gerlici, A modified strip method to speed up the tangential stress between wheel and rail calculation. Applied mechanics and materials 486, 371-378 (2014), ISSN 1660-9336 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Smetanka, P. Šťastniak, Analysis of contact stresses of theoretical and worn profile by using computer simulation. Manufacturing Technology 17 (4), 580-585 (2017), ISSN 1213-2489 [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Šťastniak, M. Moravčík, P. Baran, L. Smetanka, Computer aided structural analysis of newly developed railway bogie frame. MATEC Web of conferences 157 (2018), ISSN 2261-236X [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Šťastniak, Wagon chassis frame design with adaptable loading platform. Manufacturing Technology 15 (5), 935-940 (2015), ISSN 1213-2489 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.