Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 232, 2018
2018 2nd International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering (EITCE 2018)
Article Number 01049
Number of page(s) 4
Section Network Security System, Neural Network and Data Information
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823201049
Published online 19 November 2018
  1. Xie Chunli, Yu Ximeng, Wang Shuqin. 2014. Reliability Prediction Approach for Web Service Based On SOA [J]. Computer Science(2014), 7:41-47. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ding Fei. 2013. Research on Reliability Related Technology of Trusted Web Services [D] : (Master’s degree thesis). Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  3. Lin Rongru. 2017. Research on Web Services Trustworthiness Prediction Technology Based on Selective Neural Network Integration [D] : (Master’s degree thesis). Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Ding. T. Xu. T Ye et al. 2016. Online Prediction and Improvement of Reliability for Service Oriented Systems [J] . IEEE Transactions on Reliability, (2016), 65(3):1133-1148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. X. Wang. J. Zhu, Z Zheng et al. 2016. A spatial-temporal Qos prediction approach for time-aware Web service recommendation [J]. ACM Transactions on the Web, (2016), 10(1), 1-25. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Silic. G. Delac. S. Srbljic. 2015. Prediction of Atomic Web Services Reliability for QoS-aware Recommendation [J]. IEEE Transactions on services Computing, (2015), 8(3): 425-438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang Lei. 2017. Research on Reliability Time Series Prediction Method and Key Technology of “System of Systems” Based on Service Combination [D] : (Doctoral thesis). Southeast University, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  8. Jinag Min. 2017. Demand-driven Web services portfolio trusted evaluation research [D] : (Master’s degree thesis). Dalian Maritime University, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang Hemin. 2017. Design and Application of Wind Power Prediction System Based on BP Neural Network and WRF Mode [D] : (Master’s degree thesis). University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang Weiyue. Fu Qian. Wan Dingsheng. 2017. Time series prediction model based on deep recurrent neural network [J]. Computer Technology And Development, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Yuhuan. Qian Jiang. 2018. Sentiment analysis based on two LSTM text structures [J]. Software, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  12. Cho K. Merrienboer B V. Gulcehre C et al. 2014. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv, (2014), 1406-1078. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hochreiter S. Schmidhuber J. 1997. Long Short-Term Memory[J].Neural Computation, (1997), 9(8): 1735-1780. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang Xin. Wu Ji. Liu Chao et al. 2018. Fault Time Series Prediction Based on LSTM Recurrent Neural Network [J]. Journal of Beijing Aerospace University, (2018), 44(4) : 772-784. [Google Scholar]
  15. Colah. 2015. http://colah.github.io/posts/2015-08-Understanding-LSTMs [EB/OL]. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yu FangHeng. 2018. Research on Recurrent Neural Network Gate Structure Model [D] : (Master’s degree thesis). Zhejiang University, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu Yang. 2017. Time Series Prediction Based on GRU Neural Network [D] : (Master’s degree thesis). Chengdu University of Technology, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. Wen Bowen. Dong Wenhan. Xie Wujie. Ma Jun. 2018. Stochastic forest parameter optimization based on improved grid search algorithm [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, (2018), 54(10) : 34-40. [Google Scholar]
  19. Diederik Kingma. Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam : A Method for Stochastic Optimization [J]. Computer Science, (2014). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.