Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 231, 2018
12th International Road Safety Conference GAMBIT 2018 - “Road Innovations for Safety - The National and Regional Perspective”
Article Number 05006
Number of page(s) 7
Section Other road safety problems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823105006
Published online 16 November 2018
  1. K. Jamroz, Metoda zarządzania ryzykiem w inżynierii drogowej (Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdańskiej, Gdańsk, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Kadziński, Integracja pojęć, in: R. Krystek (Ed.), Zintegr. Syst. Bezpieczeństwa Transp. T. 2, Uwarunk. Rozw. Integr. Syst. Bezpieczeństwa Transp., pp. 285-289 (Warszawa, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Hollnagel, Safety-II in Practice (Routledge, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Hollnagel, Safety-I and Safety-II : The Past and Future of Safety Management (CRC Press, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Patriarca, G. Di Gravio, F. Costantino, A Monte Carlo evolution of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to assess performance variability in complex systems, Saf. Sci. 91 pp. 49-60 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.016 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Hollnagel, The FRAM Model Visualiser, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. Q. Yang, J. Tian, T. Zhao, Safety is an emergent property: Illustrating functional resonance in Air Traffic Management with formal verification, Saf. Sci. 93 pp. 162-177 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.12.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Pickup, S. Atkinson, E. Hollnagel, P. Bowie, S. Gray, S. Rawlinson, K. Forrester, Blood sampling - Two sides to the story, Appl. Ergon. 59 pp. 234-242 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.027 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Studic, A. Majumdar, W. Schuster, W.Y. Ochieng, A systemic modelling of ground handling services using the functional resonance analysis method, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 74 pp. 245-260 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.11.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Patriarca, G. Di Gravio, F. Costantino, M. Tronci, The Functional Resonance Analysis Method for a systemic risk based environmental auditing in a sinter plant: A semi-quantitative approach, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 63 pp. 72-86 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.12.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Patriarca, J. Bergström, Modelling complexity in everyday operations: functional resonance in maritime mooring at quay, Cogn. Technol. Work. pp. 1-19 (2017). doi:10.1007/s10111-017-0426-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. F. Anvarifar, M.Z. Voorendt, C. Zevenbergen, W. Thissen, An application of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to risk analysis of multifunctional flood defences in the Netherlands, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 158 pp. 130-141 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Patriarca, J. Bergström, G. Di Gravio, Defining the functional resonance analysis space: Combining Abstraction Hierarchy and FRAM, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 165 pp. 34-46 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.032 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. D.C. Raben, S.B. Bogh, B. Viskum, K.L. Mikkelsen, E. Hollnagel, Proposing leading indicators for blood sampling: application of a method based on the principles of resilient healthcare, Cogn. Technol. Work. pp. 1-9 (2017). doi:10.1007/s10111-017-0437-z [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Jensen, T. Aven, Hazard/threat identification: Using functional resonance analysis method in conjunction with the Anticipatory Failure Determination method, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 231 pp. 1748006X1769806 (2017). doi:10.1177/1748006X17698067 [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Smoczyński, A. Kadziński, A. Gill, Simulating the world described with the functional resonance analysis method, in: S. Haugen, A. Barros, C. van Gulijk, T. Kongsvik, J.E. Vinnem (Eds.), Saf. Reliab. - Safe Soc. a Chang. World, pp. 1247-1252 (Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.