Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 231, 2018
12th International Road Safety Conference GAMBIT 2018 - “Road Innovations for Safety - The National and Regional Perspective”
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 8
Section Safe road infrastructure
Published online 16 November 2018
  1. M. Antoniuk, Ł. Jeliński, Badanie wpływu rodzaju otoczenia drogi na liczbę i skutki niebezpiecznych zdarzeń drogowych na przykładzie dróg krajowych województwa pomorskiego (in Polish). Master Thesis (Gdansk University of Technology, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Jamroz, M. Antoniuk, L. Jelinski, K. Gronowska, Częstość i konsekwencje wypadnięcia pojazdu z drogi na przykładzie województwa pomorskiego (in Polish), Drogownictwo. 4-5 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Jamroz, K. Gronowska, M. Antoniuk, Ł. Jelinski, Identyfikacja najechań na barierę drogową na przykładzie województwa pomorskiego (in Polish), in: Semin. Forum - Barier., (Cracow, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. Ł. Jeliński, K. Jamroz, J. Jamroz, M. Antoniuk, Functionality of road safety devices - identification and analysis of factors, MATEC Web Conf. 122 (2017). doi: [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Kosmowski, J. Zawalich, Zarządzanie bezpieczeństwem w złożonych obiektach i instalacjach krytycznych (in Polish), in: Model. Syst. Oceny Ryzyka i Diagnostyki Tech., pp. 167-177 (Silesian University of Technology, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Antoniuk, L. Gumińska, Ł. Jeliński, J. Wachnicka, The influence of road safety barriers on traffic safety (in Polish), Logistyka. 4 (2014). doi:10.13140/2.1.5124.9600 [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Cusson, Z. Lounis, L. Daigle, Durability monitoring for improved service life predictions of concrete bridge decks in corrosive environments, Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 26 pp. 524-541 (2011). doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00710.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Grzyl, A. Kristowski, K. Jamroz, A. Gobis, Methods of estimating the cost of traffic safety equipment's life cycle, MATEC Web Conf. 122 (2017). doi:10.1051/matecconf/20171220 2003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. PN-EN 1317-2 Road restraint systems, Part 2: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for safety barriers including vehicle parapets (The Polish Committee for Standardization, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Jamroz, S. Burzyński, W. Witkowski, K. Wilde, G. Bagiński, Numerical methods for the assessment of bridge safety barriers, Adv. Mech. Theor. Comput. Interdiscip. Issues - 3rd Polish Congr. Mech. PCM 2015 21st Int. Conf. Comput. Methods Mech. C. 2015. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Wilde, S. Burzyński, D. Bruski, J. Chróścielewski, W. Witkowski, TB11 test for short w-beam road barrier, in: 11th Eur. LS-DYNA Conf. Salzbg. DYNAmore GmbH, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Wilde, K. Jamroz, D. Bruski, M. Budzyński, S. Burzyński, J. Chroscielewski, W. Witkowski, Curb-to-Barrier Face Distance Variation an a TB51 Bridge Barrier Crash Test Simulation, Arch. Civ. Eng. 63 pp. 187-199 (2017). doi: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Elvik, The safety value of guardrails and crash cushions: A meta-analysis of evidence from evaluation studies, Pergamon. 27 pp. 523-549 (1994). doi:10.1016/0001-4575(95)00003-I [Google Scholar]
  14. RISER, D04: Envelope of vehicle and driver response prior to collisions (Chalmers University of Technology, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Karim, R. Magnusson, M. Wiklund, Assessment of Injury Rates Associated with Road Barrier Collision, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 48 pp. 52-63 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.987 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Hong, Y. Lee, J. Kim, W. Kim, Development of Traffic Accident Prediction Models, Proc. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 5 pp. 2046-2061 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  17. AASHTO, Maintenance Manual for Roadways and Bridges. 4th Edition (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C., 2007) [Google Scholar]
  18. W.J. Fitzgerald, W-Beam Guardrail Repair: A Guide for Highway and Street Maintenance Personnel. FHWA-SA-08-002 (U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Gabauer, H.C. Gabler, Review of Current Damage-Level Criteria for Longitudinal Barrier Repair, Transp. Res. Rec. 702 pp. 1-17 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  20. H.C. Gabler, D.J. Gabauer, C.E. Hampton, Criteria for Restoration of Longitudinal Barriers. NCHRP Report 656 (Transportation Research Board, 2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Fredriksson, H.G. Holmen, The ageing of safety barriers. Functional limits for safety barriers that deviate from the nominal in height and/or perpendicular position. Report 1301-1 (Trafikverket, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  22. RISER, D06: European best practice for roadside design: Guidelines for roadside infrastructure on new and existing roads (Chalmers University of Technology, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  23. K.K. Mak, D.L. Sicking, Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP) - Engineer's Manual. NCHRP Report 492 (Transportation Research Board, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  24. J. McCullah, D. Gray, Environmentally Sensitive Channel- and Bank-Protection Measures. NCHRP Report 544 (Transportation Research Board, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  25. H. Karim, R. Magnusson, K. Natanaelsson, Life-Cycle Cost Analyses for Road Barriers, J. Transp. Eng. 138 pp. 830-851 (2012). doi: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. G.L. Williams, Whole Life Cost-Benefit Analysis for Median Safety Barriers. Project report PPR279 (TRL, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  27. B.R. Hammonds, R. Troutbeck, Crash Test Outcomes for Three Generic Barrier Types, in: 25th ARRB Conf. - Shap. Futur. Link. Policy, Res. Outcomes, (Perth, Australia, 2012) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.