Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 222, 2018
3rd International Workshop on Flexibility in Sustainable Construction (ORSDCE 2018)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 7
Published online 29 October 2018
  1. Z. Ma, S. Cai, N. Mao, Q. Yang, J. Feng, P. Wang, Automat. Constr., Construction quality management based on a collaborative system using BIM and indoor positioning, 92, 35–45 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J.Y. Lee, J.So. Choi, O.S. Kwon, C.S. Park, 2012 International Conference on Information Science and Applications, A Study on Construction Defect Management Using Augmented Reality Technology, May 2012 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Mills, P. E. D. Love, P. Williams, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Defect Costs in Residential Construction, January 2009 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. El-Saboni, G. Aouad, A. Sabouni, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Electronic communication systems effects on the success of construction projects in United Arab Emirates, 23, 130–138 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Zhou, H. Luo, Y. Yang, Automat. Constr., Implementation of augmented reality for segment displacementinspection during tunneling construction, 82, 112–121 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Bosché, E. Guenet, Automat. Constr., Automating surface flatness control using terrestrial laser scanning and building information models, 44, 212–226 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Boton, S. Kubicki, G. Halin, Procedia Engineering, The Challenge of Level of Development in 4D/BIM Simulation Across AEC Project Lifecyle. A Case Study, 123, 59-67 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Boton, Automat. Constr., Supporting constructability analysis meetings with Immersive Virtual Reality-based collaborative BIM 4D simulation, 96, 1-15 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Dubas, J. Pasławski, Procedia Engineering, The concept of improving communication in BIM during transfer to operation phase on the Polish market, 208, 14–19 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. J. E. Ross, S. Perry, Total Quality Management, CRC Press, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  11. P. E. D. Love, Z. Irani, F. Ackermann, P. Teo, Production Planning and control, The cost of Rework : Insights from Construction and Opportunities for Learning (2018). [Google Scholar]
  12. V. Teravainen, J.M. Junnonen, S. Ali-Loytty, Construction Economics and Building, Organizational culture: Case of the Finnish construction industry, 18, 48–69, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Prado-Román, C. Mercado-Idoeta, C. Del Castillo Peces, J. Del Castillo Peces, Cuadernos de Gestion, The effects of implementing ISO 9001 in the Spanish construction industry, 18, 149-172, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  14. E. C. Eze, J. E. Idiake, B. O. Ganiyu, Independent Journal of Management & Production, Rework risks triggers in the nigerian construction industry: a view of built environment professionals, 9, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Vukomanović, M.M. Nahod, M. Radujkovic, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, EFQM excellence model as the TQM model of the construction industry of southeastern Europe, 20, 70–81, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Ham, K.K. Ham, J. J. Lin, M. Golparvar-Fard, Visualization in Engineering, Visual monitoring of civil infrastructure systems via camera-equipped Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): a review of related works, 4, (2016). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.