Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 217, 2018
2018 International Conference on Vibration, Sound and System Dynamics (ICVSSD 2018)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 6
Section System Dynamics
Published online 17 October 2018
  1. H. C. Lord, “Vibration-dampening mounting”, United States Patern Office, No. 1778503. 1930. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. V Schmitt and C. J. Leingang, “Design of Elastomeric Vibration Isolation Mounting Systems for Internal Combustion Engines.” SAE Technical Paper 760431, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. W. Sayers and C. Mink, “A Simulation Graphical User Interface for Vehicle Dynamics Models,” SAE Trans., Vol. 104, pp. 58–67, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Yu, N. G. Naganathan, and R. V Dukkipati, “A literature review of automotive vehicle engine mounting systems,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 36, pp. 123–142, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Micali and M. Carlo, “Viscoelastic properties,” Physical Review A, Vol. 42, No. 12, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shimizu, N., & Zhang, W., “Fractional calculus approach to dynamic problems of viscoelastic materials,” JSME Int., Vol. 4, No. 42, pp. 825–837, 1999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fukunaga, M., & Shimizu, N., “Analytical and numerical solutions for fractional viscoelastic equations,” JSME Int., Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 251–259, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lin, T. R., Farag, N. H., & Pan, J., “Evaluation of frequency dependent rubber mount stiffness and damping by impact test.,” Appl. Acoust., Vol. 7, No. 66, pp. 829–844, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ooi L. E. and Z. M. Ripin, “Optimization of an engine mounting system with consideration of frequency-dependent stiffness and loss factor,” J. Vib. Control, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 2406–2419, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. M. Sjoberg and L. Kari, “Non-Linear Behavior of a Rubber Isolator System Using Fractional Derivatives,” Veh. Syst. Dyn., Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 217–236, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu, S., Cai, C., & Spanos, P. D., “A nonlinear and fractional derivative viscoelastic model for rail pads in the dynamic analysis of coupled vehicle–slab track systems.,” J. Sound Vib., No. 335, pp. 304–320, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Gade, H. Herlufsen, K. Zaveri, and K.-H. H., “Damping Measurements From Impulse Response Functions From Resonance and Non-resonance Excitation Techniques,” Brüel Kjaer Tech. Rev., Vol. 2, No. 2, p. 50, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  13. L. E. Ooi and Z. M. Ripin, “Dynamic stiffness and loss factor measurement of engine rubber mount by impact test,” Mater. Des., Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 1880–1887, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guzmán-Nieto, M., Tapia-González, P. E., & Ledezma-Ramírez, D. F., “Low frequency experimental analysis of dry friction damping in cable isolators.,” J. Low Freq. Noise, Vib. Act. Control, Vol. 4, No. 34, pp. 513–524, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vangipuram, R., Padmanablan, C., & Ravindran, P., “Dynamic characterization of rubber mounts.,” 23rd Int. Congr. Sound Vib., pp. 10–14, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bachleitner-Hofmann, A., Abert, C., Bruckner, F., Palmesi, P., Satz, A., & Suess, D., “Unexpected width of minor magnetic hysteresis loops in nanostructures,” IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 7, No. 52, pp. 1–4, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wei, Jing, Yicheng Zhao, Heng Li, Guobao Li, Jinlong Pan, Dongsheng Xu, Qing Zhao and D. Y. “Hysteresis analysis based on the ferroelectric effect in hybrid perovskite solar cells.,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 21, pp. 3937–3945, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nashif A. D., Jones, D. I., & Henderson, J. P., Vibration damping. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kikuchi, M., & Aiken, I. D., “An analytical hysteresis model for elastomeric seismic isolation bearings,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol. 2, No. 26, pp. 215–231, 1997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. I. Z. Zainudin, H. A. Darun, and O. L. Ean, “Dynamic Measurement of Engine Mount Properties Using Hysteresis Loop Method,” no. August, 2017. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.