EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 217 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 217 (2018) 02004 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 217, 2018
2018 International Conference on Vibration, Sound and System Dynamics (ICVSSD 2018)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 7
Section System Dynamics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821702004
Published online 17 October 2018
  1. Berry, S.M.M.R.V.T., B.R.A.P. Wilson, and L.F.J.M.D.P.M.P.H. Fallon, Strokes. 2017, Salem Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lindsay, P., et al., Toward a more effective approach to stroke: Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2008. 178(11): p. 1418–1425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Daniel, K., et al., What Are the Social Consequences of Stroke for Working-Aged Adults? Stroke, 2009. 40(6): p. e431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pollock, Alex & Baer, Gillian & Campbell, Pauline & Ling Choo, Pei & Forster, Anne & Morris, Jacqui & Pomeroy, Valerie & Langhorne, Peter. (2014). Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 4. CD001920. 10.1002/14651858.CD001920.pub3. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jung HY. (2017) Rehabilitation in Subacute and Chronic Stage After Stroke. In: Lee SH. (eds) Stroke Revisited: Diagnosis and Treatment of Ischemic Stroke. Stroke Revisited. Springer, Singapore [Google Scholar]
  6. Rønning, O.M., & Guldvog, B. (1998). Outcome of subacute stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 29 4, 779–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hebert, D., Lindsay, M. P., McIntyre, A., Kirton, A., Rumney, P. G., Bagg, S., et al. (2016). Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Stroke Rehabilitation Practice Guidelines, Update 2015. International Journal of Stroke, 11(4), 459–484. doi: 10.1177/1747493016643553 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Poon, C.-S. Sensorimotor learning and information processing by Bayesian internal models. in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004. IEMBS’04. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 2004. IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  9. Israel, J.F., et al., Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic-and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Physical therapy, 2006. 86 (11): p. 1466–1478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wolbrecht, E.T., et al. Real-time computer modeling of weakness following stroke optimizes robotic assistance for movement therapy. in Neural Engineering, 2007. CNE’07. 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on. 2007. IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  11. Marchal-Crespo, L. and D.J. Reinkensmeyer, Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2009. 6 (1): p. 20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kwakkel, G., B.J. Kollen, and H.I. Krebs, Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2007. 22 (2): p. 111–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thikey, Heather Anne and van Wijck, Frederike and Grealy, Madeleine and Rowe, Philip (2011) A need for meaningful visual feedback of lower extremity function after stroke. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth 2011). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp. 379–383. ISBN 9781612847672 [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, Chong & Rusák, Zoltán & Horvath, Imre & Ji, Linhong. (2016). Validation of the reasoning of an entry-level cyber-physical stroke rehabilitation system equipped with engagement enhancing capabilities. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 56. 185–199. 10.1016/j.engappai.2016.09.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Lehrer and L. Olson (2009). Visual feedback for Mixed Reality stroke rehabilitation, 2009 Virtual Rehabilitation International Conference, Haifa, pp. 194–194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Physiopedia. Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke. Retrieved from https://www.physio-pedia.com/Fugl Meyer_Assessment_of_Motor_Recovery_after_Stroke [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.