Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 210, 2018
22nd International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC 2018)
Article Number 04016
Number of page(s) 8
Section Computers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821004016
Published online 05 October 2018
  1. M. Weske, Business Process Management. Concepts, Languages, Architectures, Berlin, Springer-Verlag (2007) [Google Scholar]
  2. OMG, BPMN - standard documents, [Online] http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/ (2011) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Arsanjani, N. Bharade, M. Borgenstrand, P. Schume, J. K. Wood & V. Zheltonogov, Business Process Management Design Guide. Using IBM Business Process Manager, USA, IBM Corporation (2015) [Google Scholar]
  4. WFMC, [Online] http://www.wfmc.org (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. WFMC, XML Process Definition Language - standard XPDL documents, [Online] http://www.xpdl.org/ (2012) [Google Scholar]
  6. W. van der Aalst, K. van Hee, Workflow Management. Models, Methods, and Systems (The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Bliźniuk, M. Chmielewski, T. Gzik, J. Koszela, Warehouse of processes, Studia Informatica, 33-2A, 111-127 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Zadora, Hurtownie danych w organizacji inteligentnej (University of Economics, Katowice, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  9. W. van der Aalst, Process Mining, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. W. van der Aalst & others, Process Mining Manifesto, IEEE Task Force on Process Mining, [Online] http://www.win.tue.nl/ieeetfpm/downloads/Process%20Mining%20Manifesto.pdf (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Gawin, Systemy informatyczne w zarządzaniu procesami Workflow, (PWN, Warsaw, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Sidnev, J. Tuominen i B. Krassi, Business Process Modeling and Simulation (Otamedia Oy, Espoo, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Kiedrowicz, Zarządzanie informacjami wrażliwymi - wybrane aspekty organizacyjne, prawne i techniczne ochrony informacji niejawnych (WAT, Warsaw, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Koszela, Business process modeling for processing classified documents using RFID technology in 20th International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers, 76, N. Mastorakis, V. Mladenov, and A. Bulucea, Eds. (MATEC Web of Conferences, Cedex A: E D P Sciences (2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Koszela, Business process modeling for processing classified documents using RFID technology in 21th International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers, 125, 02013, N. Mastorakis, V. Mladenov, and A. Bulucea, Eds., MATEC Web of Conferences, Cedex A: E D P Sciences (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Waszkowski, M. Kiedrowicz, T. Nowicki, Z. Wesołowski, and K. Worwa, Business processes in the RFID-equipped restricted access administrative office, in 20th International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers, vol. 76, N. Mastorakis, V. Mladenov, and A. Bulucea, Eds. (MATEC Web of Conferences, Cedex A: E D P Sciences (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Kiedrowicz, J. Koszela, Secret office model for the processing of classified documents using RFID technology, Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, 42, 67-81 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  18. Dijkman R., Dumas M., Boudewijn van Dongen, Käärik R., Mendling J., Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation, Information Systems, Elsevier, 36, 498-516 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Ehrig, A. Koschmider, A. Oberweis, Measuring Similarity between Semantic Business Process Models, Conferences in Research and Practice in Information, 67, Australian Computer Society (2007) [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Dijkman, M. Dumas, L. García-Bañuelos, Business Process Graphs: Similarity Search and Matching, Graph data management: techniques and applications, IGI Global (2012) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.