MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 203, 2018International Conference on Civil, Offshore & Environmental Engineering 2018 (ICCOEE 2018)
|Number of page(s)||11|
|Published online||17 September 2018|
- E. Ghanbari and A. Hamidi, “Numerical modelling of rapid impact compaction in loose sands,” Geomechanics and Engineering., Vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 487-502, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V. Vukadin, “The improvement of the loosely deposited sands and silts with the Rapid Impact Compaction technique on Brezice test sites,” Engineering Geology, Vol. 160, pp. 69-80, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Tarawneh and M. Matraji, “Ground improvement using rapid impact compaction: case study in Dubai,” Journal of the Croatian Association of Civil Engineers, Vol. 66, pp. 1007-1014, (2014). [Google Scholar]
- H. Pankrath, M. Barthel, A. Knut, M. Bracciale, and R. Thiele, “Dynamic soil compaction-recent methods and research tools for innovative heavy equipment approaches,” Procedia Engineering, Vol. 125, pp. 390-396, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Parvizi, “Soil response to surface impact loads during low energy dynamic compaction,” Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 2088-2096, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Yusuf, M. S. Pallu, L. Samang, and M. W. Tjaronge, “Characteristical Analysis of Unconfined Compressive Strength and CBR Laboratory on Dredging Sediment Stabilized With Portland Cement,” International Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering IJCEE-IJENS, Vol. 12, no. 4, (2012). [Google Scholar]
- K. Zabielska-Adamska and M. J. Sulewska, “Dynamic CBR Test to Assess the Soil Compaction,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1028-1036, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Falkner, C. Adam, I. Paulmichl, D. Adam, and J. Fürpass, “Rapid Impact for Middle-Deep Improvement of the Ground-Numerical and Experimental Investigations,” From Research to Design in European Practice, June, pp. 2-11, (2010). [Google Scholar]
- C. Rajasekhar, A. Naga Sai Baba, and M. Kameswara Rao, “To Develop a Correlation Between CBR and Dynamic Cone Penetration Value,” International Journal For Technological Research In Engineering, Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11-16, (2016). [Google Scholar]
- B. M. Das, “Principles of Geotechnical Engineering,” 7 th. Cengage Learning 200 First Stamford Place, Suite 400 Stamford, CT 06902 USA, (2010). [Google Scholar]
- ASTM D1883-16, “Standard Test Method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA,” (2016). [Google Scholar]
- H. Kristiansen and M. Davies, “Ground Improvement Using Rapid Impact Compaction,” 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, August 2004, pp. 1-10, (2004). [Google Scholar]
- M. M. Mohammed, R. Hashim, and A. F. Salman, “Effective improvement depth for ground treated with rapid impact compaction,” Scientific Research and Essays, Vol. 5, no. 18, pp. 2686-2693, (2010). [Google Scholar]
- C. J. Serridge and O. Synac, “Application of the Rapid Impact Compaction (RIC) technique for risk mitigation in problematic soils,” IAEG2006, no. 294, pp. 1-13, (2006). [Google Scholar]
- Koohsaria. H, Alielahia. H, Najafib. A, Adampira. M, “Evaluation of factors affecting the estimated improvement depth of dynamic compaction using fuzzy method and PSO,” J. Soils Found. 2016, Japanese Geotech. Soc, (2016). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.