Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 197, 2018
The 3rd Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference (AASEC 2018)
Article Number 10004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Civil Engineering
Published online 12 September 2018
  1. Sigmund, Z. & Radujković, M. Risk Breakdown Structure for Construction Projects on Existing Buildings. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 119, 894-901 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fachrurrazi, Husin, S., Tripoli & Mubarak. Neural Network for the Standard Unit Price of the Building Area. in Procedia Engineering 171, 282-293 (Elsevier, 2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Marzoughi, F., Arthanari, T. & Askarany, D. A decision support framework for estimating project duration under the impact of weather. Autom. Constr. 87, 287-296 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sambasivan, M. & Soon, Y. W. Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 25, 517-526 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fachrurrazi, Away, Y. & Husin, S. The weights detection of multi-criteria by using Solver. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 7, 858-868 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. Fachrurrazi, Saiful Husin, Munirwansyah & Husaini. The Subcontractor Selection Practice using ANN-Multilayer. Int. J. Technol. 8, 761 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiang, Y. & Wu, H. Production rates of highway construction activities. in International Journal of Construction Education and Research 3, 81-98 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kannan, S. R. & Senthil, R. Production based scheduling method for linear construction in road projects. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 18, 1292-1301 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hajdu, M. & Bokor, O. The Effects of Different Activity Distributions on Project Duration in PERT Networks. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 119, 766-775 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Voinov, V., Nikulin, M. & Balakrishman, N. Chi-Squared Goodness of Fit Tests with Applications. (Academic Press, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. Fachrurrazi. The end user requirement for project management software accuracy. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 81, 1112-1121 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. Proverbs, D. G., Holt, G. D. & Olomolaiye, P. O. A comparative evaluation of planning engineers’ formwork productivity rates in European construction. Build. Environ. 33, 181-187 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ix, I. & Congress, W. The Productivity of Steel Reinforcement Placement in Australian Construction. 1-9 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  14. Freeman Price, A. D. An evaluation of production output for in situ concrete work. (© Andrew David Freeman Price, 1986). [Google Scholar]
  15. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. Multivariate Data Analysis. Vectors (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, L., Liu, Y. & Tang, Y. Production Rate Determination for Linear Construction Projects Based on Linear Scheduling Method. Int. J. Smart Home 10, 143-152 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chong, W. K., Lee, S.-H. & O’Connor, J. Estimating Highway Construction Production Rates during Design: Elements of a Useful Estimation Tool. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 11, 258-266 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.