EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 195 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 195 (2018) 06012 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 195, 2018
The 4th International Conference on Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering (ICRMCE 2018)
Article Number 06012
Number of page(s) 10
Section Construction Management and Maintenance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819506012
Published online 22 August 2018
  1. T. Abdelhamid and S. Salem, Int.Work. Innov. Mater. Des. Civ. Infrastruct., no. Dec, pp. 1-25 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Adamu and G. Howell, 20th Annu. Conf. Int. Gr. Lean Constr., pp. 1-25 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Cerveró-Romero, P. Napolitano, E. Reyes, and L. Teran, Iglc-21, vol. 1, no. 40, pp. 709-718 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Ballard and I. Tommelein, Current Process Bechmark for The LPS (California, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. H. G. Ballard, J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689-1699 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Patel, The Last Planner System For Reliable Project Delivery (Texas, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  7. I. Tommelein and G. Ballard, The Last Planner Production System Workbook (LCI, California, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. AlSehaimi, P. Tzortzopoulos, and L. Koskela, 17th Annu. Conf. Int. Gr. Lean Constr. IGLC 2009, no. July (2009) (Unpublished) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. L. Fernandez-Solis et al., J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 354-360 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Y.-W. Kim and G. Ballard, J. Manag. Eng., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 223-228 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Mossman, Last Planner (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Mossman, Last Planner (2009) [Google Scholar]
  13. O. Salem, J. Solomon, A. Genaidy, and M. Luegring, Lean Constr. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1-21 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  14. W. I. Dharmawan, D. Oktarina, and T. C. Wibowo, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 59-68 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Mossman, Last Planner (2012) [Google Scholar]
  16. B. T. Kalsaas, I. Grindheim, and N. Laeknes, 22nd Annu. Conf. Int. Gr. Lean Constr. Underst. Improv. Proj. Based Prod. IGLC 2014, pp. 639-650 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  17. O. Salem, J. Solomon, A. Genaidy, and I. Minkarah, J. Manag. Eng., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 168-175 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Gao and S. P. Low, Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1260-1272 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Davidson, Last Planner System: Business Process Standard and Guidelines (2015) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Kemmer, L. Koskela, and S. Sapountzis, HaCIRIC 11 Conf. Proc., pp. 1-11 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  21. J. G. Sarhan, B. Xia, S. Fawzia, and A. Karim, Constr. Econ. Build., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 46 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Castillo, L. F. Alarcón, and J. L. Salvatierra, J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 1-10 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Ghosh, D. E. Dickerson, and T. Mills, Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1-18 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Tezel, L. Koskela, and Z. Aziz, Prod. Plan. Control, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 247-269 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. E. P. Small, K. Al, and H. Al, Examination of Opportunities for Integration of Lean Principles in Construction in Dubai (CCC, Primosten, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Johansen and G. Porter, 11th Annu. Conf. Int. Gr. Lean Constr., vol. 24, no. August, pp. 23-35 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  27. F. Hamzeh and O. Z. Aridi, Modeling The Last Planner System Metrics : A Case Study of An AEC Company (IGLC-21, Fortaleza, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  28. F. Hamzeh, G. Ballard, and I. D. Tommelein, Lean Constr. J., pp. 15-34 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  29. V. Porwal, J. L. Fernandez-Solis, S. Lavy, and Z. K. Rybkowski, no. July, pp. 548-556 (2010) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.