EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 182 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 182 (2018) 02010 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 182, 2018
17th International Conference Diagnostics of Machines and Vehicles
Article Number 02010
Number of page(s) 8
Section Methodology and Vibroacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818202010
Published online 30 July 2018
  1. J. Anderson, F. Fleek, K. Garrity, F. Drake, Integrating Usability Techniques into Software Development, January/February 2001, IEEE SOFTWARE (2001) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. H. Blackmon, P. G. Polson, M. Kitajima, C. Lewis, Cognitive walkthrough for the web, CHI '02 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2002) [Google Scholar]
  3. J. St. B. T. Evans,The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2006, Vol. 13, Iss. 3 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  4. Eileen G. Abelse, Marilyn Domas White, Karla Hahn, A user based design process for Web sites, Internet Research, Vol. 8 Iss. 1 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  5. Gofman A., Moskowitz H.R., Fyrbjork J., Moskowitz D., Mets M. (2009), Extending Rule Developing Experimentation to Perception of Food Packages with Eye Tracking, Open Food Science Journal; Vol. 3 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  6. Kossecki, P.; Wachowicz, J. Świerczyńska-Kaczor, U.;. Possible Stress Factors for Elderly Users in Online Human Resources Services, in: Psychology&Health vol. 28, Taylor&Francis (2012) [Google Scholar]
  7. Ludwiszewski, B.; Redlarski, K.; Wachowicz J.. Możliwości zastosowania metody Kansei Engineering w projektowaniu usług on-line dla osób zagrożonych wykluczeniem cyfrowym, in : Interfejs użytkownika. Kansei w praktyce, eds. Sikorski M., Marasek K., pp. 88-96, Warszawa, PJWSTK (2011) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Maguire, Context of Use Within Usability Activities, Int. J. Human-Computer Studies (2001) [Google Scholar]
  9. Meißner M., Decker R. (2010), Eye-Tracking Information Processing In Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis, International Journal of Market Research; Vol. 52 Issue 5 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. J. Muller, L. Matheson, C. Page, R. Gallup, Methods & tools: participatory heuristic evaluation, interactions, Interactions, Vol. 5 Iss. 5, Sept./Oct. 1998 ACM (1998) [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Nielsen; J.M. Faber, Improving system usability through parallel design, Computer, Vol. 29 Iss. 2. Feb. 1996, IEEE (1996) [Google Scholar]
  12. Task Analysis, usability.gov, https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/task-analysis.html, accessed 2018-05-03 [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Nielsen, The use and misuse of focus groups, IEEE Software, Vol.: 14 Iss.: 1, IEEE [Google Scholar]
  14. R3UEMs: Review, Report and Refine Usability Evaluation Methods: The 3rd COST294-MAUSE International Workshop, 5th March 2007, Athens, Greece, eds. Scapin D., Law. E (2007) [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Rafla, P. N. Robillard, M. Desmarais, Investigating the impact of usability on software architecture through scenarios: a case study on web systems, http://trafla.tripod.com/TR-Article_Final.pdf, accessed 2018-05-12 [Google Scholar]
  16. Redlarski, K.;, Kossecki, P.; Ludwiszewski, B.; Świerczyńska-Kaczor, U.; Wachowicz, J.. Czynniki wpływające na efektywność korzystania z multimedialnych serwisów internetowych przez osoby starsze, in: Edukacja dla bezpieczeństwa, pp. 59-70 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  17. Redlarski, K.; Wachowicz, J.;, Ludwiszewski B.. Online services for the elderly towards a better quality of life: What encourages, what discourages? In: Psychology & Health 28, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Reinhard, M. Tscheligi, V. Giller. “Paper prototyping - what is it good for?: a comparison of paper-and computer-based low-fidelity prototyping.” CHI Extended Abstracts (2003). [Google Scholar]
  19. Świerczyńska-Kaczor, U.; Wachowicz, J.. Ocena dostosowania internetowych serwisow rekrutacyjnych do potrzeb osob starszych - metoda eye-tracking, in : Rozwoj potencja.u spo.ecznego organizacji - wyzwania w XXI wieku, eds. Klincewicz K., Grzywacz W., pp. 215-230, Warsaw University (2012) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. M. Thompson, Remote observation strategies for usability testing, Information Technology and Libraries; Chicago Vol. 22, Iss. 1, (2003): [Google Scholar]
  21. Wachowicz J. Card Sorting, in: R3UEMs: Review, Report and Refine Usability Evaluation Methods: The 3rd COST294-MAUSE International Workshop, 5th March 2007, Athens, Greece, eds. Scapin D., Law. E., (2007) [Google Scholar]
  22. Wachowicz J. Data Gathering Methods: Review - Questionnaire, in: R3UEMs: Review, Report and Refine Usability Evaluation Methods: The 3rd COST294-MAUSE International Workshop, 5th March 2007, Athens, Greece, eds. Scapin D., Law. E., (2007) [Google Scholar]
  23. Wachowicz, J.. Information Society in Poland – Similarities and Differences in the Perception of ICT Between Generations, in: Information Systems: Development, Research, Applications, Education. 9th SISGSAND/PLAIS EuroSymposium 2016 Gdańsk, Poland, ed.: Wrycza S., LNBIP 264, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Springer (2016) [Google Scholar]
  24. Wachowicz, J.; Ludwiszewski, B.; Redlarski, K. (2012). Factors Disturbing Internet Usage in Opinion of Elderly Users, in: Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society, Vol. 4, 2012, Risoprint, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  25. L. White, H. Almezen, N. Alzeidi, User-based testing of GUI sequences and their interactions,. ISSRE 2001. Proceedings.of 12th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, 2001, IEEE xPlore (2001) [Google Scholar]
  26. J. R. Wood, L. E. Wood, Card Sorting: Current Practices and Beyond, Journal of Usability Studies, Vol. 4, Issue 1, November 2008, (2008) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.