EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 181 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 181 (2018) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 181, 2018
The 1st International Symposium on Transportation Studies for Developing Countries (ISTSDC 2017)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Social and Environmental Aspects of Transportation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818103002
Published online 30 July 2018
  1. Choi, CC,and Loh, N., Transport Policies and Patterns: A comparison of five Asian Cities. Journeys .(2013). [Google Scholar]
  2. Chuen, OC, Karim, MR, Yusoff, S, 2014, Mode Choice between Private and Public Transport in Klang Valley, Malaysia, The Scientific World Journal, Article ID 394587,http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/394587. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  3. Nurdden, A., Rahmat, R. A. O. K., and Ismail, A., Effect of transportation policies on modal shift from private car to public transport in Malaysia, Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(7), 1013-1018. (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., van Knippenberg, A., and van Knippenberg, C., Attitude versus general habit: Antecedents of travel mode choice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24,285-300. (1994). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R. and Ardeshiri, M., Modeling travel behavior by the structural relationships between lifestyle, built environment and non-working trips. Transportation Research Part A 78, 506–51. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  6. Nairne, J.S., Psychology: The Adaptive Mind (3rd ed), Thomson Learning Inc. London. (2003). [Google Scholar]
  7. Parkany,E., Gallagher, R., Viveiros, P. (20005). Are Attitudes Important in Travel Choices? Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. (2005) [Google Scholar]
  8. Thorpe, N., Hills, P., and Jaensirisa, S., Public attitudes to TDM measures: a comparative study. Transport Policy. 7, 243-257. (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sunkanapalli, S., Pendyala, R. and Kuppam, A. Dynamic Analysis of Traveler Attitudes and Perceptions Using Panel Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1718, -1, 2000, 52-60. (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Outwater, M., S. Castleberry, Y. Shiftan, M. Ben Akiva, Y. S. Zhou and A. Kuppam, Use of Structural Equation Modeling for an Attitudinal Market Segmentation Approach to Mode Choice and Ridership Forecasting. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne. (2003). [Google Scholar]
  11. Garling, T., Eek, D., Loukopoulos, P., Fujii, S., Johansson-Stenman, O., Kitamura, R., Pendyala and Vilhelmson, B., A conceptual analysis of the impact of travel demand management on private car use. Transport Policy, 9, 59-70. (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fujii, S. and Garling, T., Application of Attitude Theory for Improved Predictive Accuracy of Stated Preference Methods in Travel Demand Analysis. Transportation Research Part A, 37(4), 389-402. (2003). [Google Scholar]
  13. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M., Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey.(1980). [Google Scholar]
  14. Stansfeld, S., and Rasul, F., Psychosocial factors, depression and illness. In A. Steptoe (Ed.), Depression and physical illness (pp. 19–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (2007) [Google Scholar]
  15. Krizek, K. J., Household Lifestyles and Their Relationship to Land-Use and Transportation Planning. Minneapolis: Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs.http://www.cura.umn.edu/sites/cura.advantagelabs.com/files/publications/35-4-Krizek.pdf. (2005). 16. Department of Statistic,https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. Curtis,C., and Perkins, T., Travel Behaviour: A review of recent literature. Impacts of Transit Led Development In A New Rail Corridor Working Paper No. 3. Urbanet Department of Urban and Regional Planning Curtin University. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  17. Lyons, G., Farag, S. and Haddad, H, The substitution of communications for travel? In: Ison, S. and Rye, T., eds., The Implementation and Effectiveness of Transport Demand Management Measures: An International Perspective. Ashgate, 211-232. ISBN 9780754649533 Available from:http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/8692. (2008) [Google Scholar]
  18. Hiscock, S. Macintyre, A. Kearns, and A. Ellaway, Means of transport and ontological security: do cars provide psycho-social benefits to their users? Transportation Research Part D, 7 (2), 119–135. (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cullinane, S, The relationship between car ownership and public transport provision: a case study of Hong Kong, Transport Policy, 9(1), 29-39. (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Verhoeven H, Simons D, Van Dyck D, Van Cauwenberg J, Clarys P, and de Bourdeaudhuij I., Psychosocial and Environmental Correlates of Walking, Cycling, Public Transport and Passive Transport to Various Destinations in Flemish Older Adolescents. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0147128.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147128. (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. De Bourdeaudhuij, I, Teixeira, PJ, Cardon, G, and Deforche, B, Environmental and psychosocial correlates of physical activity in Portuguese and Belgian adults, Public Health Nutrition: 8(7), 886–895, DOI: 10.1079/PHN2005735. (2005). [Google Scholar]
  22. Groot, JIM and Steg, L., The role of value orientations in evaluating quality of life consequences of a transport pricing policy, Transportation Research Part D 11 (2006) 160–165. (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Steg, L., and Gifford, R., Building Blocks for Sustainable Transport, Volume 1, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08044-709-4.00011-2. (2008). [Google Scholar]
  24. Ory, David.,Mokhtarian, P., Modeling the structural relationships among short-distance travel amounts, perceptions, affections, and desires. Transp. Res. Part A 43, 26–43. (2009). [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Acker, V., Mokhtarian, P., Witlox, F., Car availability explained by the structural relationships between lifestyles, residential location, and underlying residential and travel attitudes. Transp. Policy 35, 88–99. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mokhtarian PL, I Salomon and ME Singer,, What moves us? an interdisciplinary exploration of reasons for traveling. Transport Reviews. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  27. Javid, M.A., Okamura, T. Nakamura, F., Tanaka, S., and Wang, R., Factors Influencing the Acceptability of Travel Demand Management (TDM) Measures in Lahore: Application of Behavioral Theories. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 9. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  28. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T.M., Ringle, C. M., &Sarstedt,M., A primeron partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: Sage Publication. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  29. Gholami, R., Sulaiman, A. B., Ramayah, T., and Molla, A., SeniorManagers’ Perception on Green Information Systems (IS) Adoptionand Environmental Performance: Results from a Field Survey.Information Management, 50(7), 431–438. (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fornell, C., andLarcker, D. F., Evaluating Structural EquationModels with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. (1981). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.