Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 177, 2018
The 5th International Seminar on Ocean and Coastal Engineering, Environmental and Natural Disaster Management (ISOCEEN 2017)
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817701006
Published online 04 July 2018
  1. Ahmadi, Hamid, E. Zavvar. Stress concentration factors induced by out-of-plane bending loads in ring-stiffened tubular KT-joints of jacket structures, Thin Walled Structures, Vol. 91, 82-95, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. U. Hidayat, R.W. Prastianto, W. Wardhana. SCF parametric study of multiplanar tubular joint double K. Bachelor Thesis of Ocean Engineering Department FTK-ITS. Surabaya. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. D.S. Murthy. An Efficient FE Modelling Strategy for Fracture Analysis of Tubular Joints. Journal Structural Engineering Research Centre, Vol. 85, May, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  4. Yeoh, Seng-Keat, Ai-Kah Soh and Chee-Kiong Soh. Behavior of Tubular T-Joints Subjected to Combined Loadings. Journal Construction Steel Research, Vol. 32, 259-280, (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Soh, Ai-Kah, Chee-Kiong Soh. Hot Spot Stress of K Tubular Joints Subjected to Combined Loadings. Journal Construction Steel Research, Vol. 26, 125-140, (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H.L.J. Pang, C.W. Lee. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of a tubular T-joint under combined axial and bending loading. Journal Fatigue, Vol. 17, 313-320, (1995) [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Chang, W.D. Dover. Predicted of stress distributions along intersection of tubular Y-joints and T-joints. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 21, 361-381, (1999) [Google Scholar]
  8. Young-Bo, Shao, Du Zhi-Fu, Lie Seng-Tjhen. Predicted of hot spot stress distribution for tubular K-joint under basic loadings. Journal of Construction Steel Research, Vol. 65. 2011-2026, (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S.P. Chiew, C.K. Soh, N.W. Wu. General SCF design equations for steel multiplanar tubular XX-joints. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 22, 283-293, (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Karamos, A. Spyros, A. Romejin, J. Wardenier. SCF equations in multi-planar welded tubular DT-joint including bending effects. Marine Structures, Vol. 15, 157-173, (2002) [Google Scholar]
  11. Wingerde, A.M. Van, J.A. Packer, J. Wardenier. Simplified SCF formulae and graphs for CHS and RHS K- and KK-connections. Journal of Construction Steel Research, Vol. 57. 221-252, (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. C.O. Woghiren, F.P. Brennan. Weld toe stress concentrations in multi-planar stiffened tubular KK-joints. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 31, 164-172, (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Naibaho, R.W. Prastianto, W. Wardhana. SCF parametric study of multiplanar tubular KDT-joint. Bachelor Thesis of Ocean Engineering Department FTK-ITS. Surabaya, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Puspaningtyas, R.W. Prastianto, W. Wardhana. Parametric study of stress intensity factor on multiplanar tubular joint with fracture mechanics. Bachelor Thesis of Ocean Engineering Department FTK-ITS. Surabaya, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. I.F. Fuadi, R.W. Prastianto, N. Syahroni. Formulation of stress concentration factors for multiplanar tubular DKT-joint using finite element method. Bachelor Thesis of Ocean Engineering Department FTK-ITS. Surabaya, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. Structural welding code: AWS D 1.1. USA, American Welding Society (AWS), (2002) [Google Scholar]
  17. DNVGL RP-C203. Recommended Practice, Fatigue Strength Analysis of Offshore Steel Structure, (2001) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Haghpanahi, H. Pirali. Hot Spot Stress Determination for a Tubular T-Joint under Combined Axial and Bending Loading. International Journal of Engineering Sciences, Vol. 17, 21-28, (2006) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.