EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 167 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 167 (2018) 01001 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 167, 2018
2018 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Manufacturing, Modeling and Mechatronics (IC4M 2018) – 2018 3rd International Conference on Design, Engineering and Science (ICDES 2018)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 11
Section Design of Engineering and Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816701001
Published online 23 April 2018
  1. The Folding Cyclist, “Folding Bike News,” (2017). Available: http://www.foldingcyclist.com/. [Accessed: 03-May-2017]. [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Cooke, J. Roderiguez, M. Chino, L. Wang, J. Fehrenbacher, C. Cameron, J. Dloffa, K. Lofgren, L. Cowan, P. Rebecca, L. Evelyn, A. Schwartz, M. Chino, and J. Chapa, “Folding Bike | Inhabitat - Green Design, Innovation, Architecture, Green Building.” Available: http://inhabitat.com/tag/folding-bike/. [Accessed: 03-May-2017]. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. F. Story, “Maximizing Usability: The Principles of Universal Design,” Assist. Technology, 10, 1, pp. 4-12, (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. J. Mayhew, “The Usability Engineering Lifecycle,” in CHI ‘99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 147-148. (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. K. J. Krizek and E. W. Stonebraker, “A Marriage Unrealized”, pp. 161-167, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Rietveld, “Non-motorised modes in transport systems: a multimodal chain perspective for The Netherlands,” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31-36, (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Y.-H. Cheng and K.-C. Liu, “Evaluating bicycle-transit users’ perceptions of intermodal inconvenience,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1690-1706, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Cox, “The Role of Human Powered Vehicles in Sustainable Mobility,” vol. 34, no. 2, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Tosi, A. Belli, A. Rinaldi, and G. Tucci, “The Intermodal Bike : multi-modal integration of cycling mobility through product and process innovations in bicycle design,” vol. 41, pp. 1501-1506, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Arunachalam, “A Typical Approach in Conceptual and Embodiment Design of Foldable Bicycle,” vol. 87, no. 19, pp. 9-16, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Roy, “Case studies of creativity in innovative product development,” Des. Stud., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 423-443, (1993). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. A. Maleque, M. S. Hossain, and S. Dyuti, “Material Properties and Design Aspects of Folding Bicycle Frame,” vol. 265, pp. 777-782, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Hyeong, J. Roh, and S. Kim, “Optimization of pivot obliquity for a foldable bicycle,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 931-936, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. C. Chen, “Bicycle foldable to align front and rear wheels along a transverse direction of the bicycle.” Google Patents, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  15. P. P. M. }ik, “Universal folding bicycle.” Google Patents, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  16. M. A. Jayasuriya, J. C. Cheng, and K. M. Schondorf, “Klapprad Folding bike.” Google Patents, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  17. D. K. De Jong, “Foldable bicycle.” Google Patents, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  18. T. W. Brown Jocelyn, “Design Thinking for Social Innovation,” Dev. Outreach, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29-43, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Norman, “Emotion & Design: Attractive Things Work Better,” interactions, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 36-42, (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Maguire, “Methods to support human-centred design,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 587-634, (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. E. Nieters, S. Ivaturi, and I. Ahmed, “Making Personas Memorable,” in CHI ‘07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1817-1824, (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Nenonen, H. Rasila, and J. Junnonen, “Customer Journey - a method to investigate user experience,” no. Schmitt (1999). [Google Scholar]
  23. “Experience-Maps-Using-Customer-Journey-Maps-to-Improve-Customer-Experience.pdf.” [Google Scholar]
  24. H. Beyer and K. Holtzblatt, “Contextual Design,” interactions, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32-42, (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Nielsen, T. Clemmensen, and C. Yssing, “Getting Access to What Goes on in People’s Heads?: Reflections on the Think-aloud Technique,” in Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction, pp. 101-110, (2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.