Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2018
12th International Fatigue Congress (FATIGUE 2018)
Article Number 21009
Number of page(s) 8
Section Welding
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816521009
Published online 25 May 2018
  1. SS-EN ISO 5817. Welding. Fusion-welded joints in steel, nickel, titanium and their alloys. Quality levels for imperfections, ISO/TC 44/SC 10 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. British Standard, BS 7910:2013+A1:2015 Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures, BSI Standards Limited (2013) [Google Scholar]
  3. API Standard, 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2007, Fitness-For-Service, New York: ASME (2007) [Google Scholar]
  4. British Energy Generation Limited, Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects, R6 Revision 4, Amendment 7 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  5. A.F. Hobbacher, Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components, 2nd ed., Springer International Publishing (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Det Norske Veritas, DNVGL-RP-C203. Fatigue design of offshore steel structures (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Steimbreger, M.D. Chapetti, Int. J. Fatigue, 105, 296-304 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. AWS, AWS D1.1/D1.1M:2015. Structural Welding code-Steel, American Welding Society (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. ASME, ASME BPVC - Section I, Rules for Construction of Power Boilers, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2015). [Google Scholar]
  10. ASME, ASME BPVC - Section III, Division 1, Subsection NF: Supports, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2010). [Google Scholar]
  11. ASME, ASTM BPVC – Section VIII, Division I, Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2015). [Google Scholar]
  12. British Standard, BS 7608-2014: Guide to fatigue design and assessment of steel products, BSI Standards Limited (2014) [Google Scholar]
  13. British Standard, BS-EN ISO 15609-1:2004: Specification and qualification of welding procedures for metallic materials. BSI Standards Limited (2004) [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Petershagen, Weld. World, 28(7/8), 114-125 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Iida, M. Sato, M. Nagai, Weld. World, 39(5): 262-271 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  16. API, API 1104: Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities, 21st ed., API Publishing Services, Washington, DC (2013) [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Jonsson, G. Dobmann, A.F. Hobbacher, M. Kassner, G. Marquis, IIW Guidelines on weld quality in relationship to fatigue strength, IIW Collection, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2016) [Google Scholar]
  18. J.R. Spadea, K.H. Frank, Fatigue strength of filletwelded transverse stiffeners with undercuts, Research Report 0-4178-1: Fillet weld detailing for stiffener, Texas Department of Transportation (2004) [Google Scholar]
  19. Volvo Group. STD 181-0004. Weld Quality Standard (2016) [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Björk, J. Samuelsson, G.B. Marquis, Weld. World, 52(1/2): 34-46 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Jonsson, J. Samuelsson, G.B. Marquis, Weld. World, 55(11/12): 79-88 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. W. Fricke, IIW Recommendations for the fatigue assessment of welded structures by notch stress analysis IIW-2006-09, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England (2012) [Google Scholar]
  23. Det Norske Veritas, DNVGL-CG-0129. Class Guideline: Fatigue Assessment of Ship Structures (2015) [Google Scholar]
  24. Dassault Systèmes, Simulia. Abaqus 6.13 User manual, Providence, RI, USA (2013) [Google Scholar]
  25. M.D. Chapetti, J. Belmonte, T. Tagawa, T. Miyata, Sci. Tech. Weld. Join. 9(5), 430-438 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. M.D. Chapetti, Int. J. Fatigue, 25(12), 1319–26 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. T.R. Gurney, Fatigue of welded structures, 2nd ed., London: Cambridge UP (1979) [Google Scholar]
  28. S.J. Maddox, Fatigue strength of welded structures, 2nd ed., Abington, Cambridge (1991) [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Berge, Eng. Frac. Mechs., 21(2), 423-435 (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. A.M. Al-Mukhtar, J. Fail. Anal. Preven., 13, 63-71 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. I. Lotsberg, Int. J. Fatigue, 66, 86-100 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.