Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2018
12th International Fatigue Congress (FATIGUE 2018)
Article Number 20008
Number of page(s) 7
Section Very High Cycle Fatigue
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816520008
Published online 25 May 2018
  1. C. Bathias, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 22, 559–565 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Mughrabi, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 25, 755–764 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Mughrabi, Int. J. Fatigue 28, 1501–1508 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Skorupski, M. Smaga, D. Eifler, Adv. Mat. Res. 891-892, 464–469 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Smaga, R. Skorupski, P. Mayer, B. Kirsch, J. C. Aurich, I. Raid, J. Seewig, J. Man, D. Eifler, T. Beck, Procedia Structural Integrity 5, 989–996 (ScienceDirect, Funchal, 2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A.M. Eleiche, M.M. Megahed, N.M. Abd-Allah, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 113, 502–508 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. K. Nalla, I. Altenberger, U. Noster, G. Y. Liu, B. Scholtes, R. O. Ritchie, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 355, 216–230 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Klotz, D. Delbergue, P. Bocher, M. Lévesque, M. Brochu, Int. J. Fatigue 110, 10–21 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Altenberger, B. Scholtes, U. Martin, H. Oettel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 264, 1–16 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Ye, S. Suslov, D. Lin, G. J. Cheng, Philos. Mag. 92, 1369–1389 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Smaga, A. Sorich, D. Eifler, T. Beck, VHCF7 Seventh International Conference on Very High Cycle Fatigue, Siegener werkstoffkundliche Berichte 14, 249–254 (Dresden, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Takahashi, T. Ogawa, Journal of Solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering 2, 366–373 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Naoe, Z. Xiong, M. Futakawa, J. Nucl. Mater. 468, 331–338 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. V. Carstensen, H. Mayer, P. Brønsted, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 25, 837–844 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. C. Grigorescu, P. M. Hilgendorff, M. Zimmermann, C. P. Fritzen, H. J. Christ, Int. J. Fatigue 93, Part 2, 250–260 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Müller-Bollenhagen, M. Zimmermann, H. J. Christ, Procedia Eng. 2, 1663–1672 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Angel, Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, 177, 165–174 (1954) [Google Scholar]
  18. G. H. Eichelmann, T. C. Hull, Trans. Am. Soc. Met. 45, 77–104 (1953) [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Mayer, R. Skorupski, M. Smaga, D. Eifler, J. C. Aurich, Proc. CIRP 14, 101–106 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Talonen, P. Aspegren, H. Hanninen, Mater. Sci. Technol. 20, 1506–1512 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. C. Aurich, P. Mayer, B. Kirsch, D. Eifler, M. Smaga, R. Skorupski, CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Techn. 63, 65–68 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Smaga, R. Skorupski, D. Eifler, T. Beck, J. Mater. Res. 32, 4452–4460 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.