Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2018
12th International Fatigue Congress (FATIGUE 2018)
Article Number 16007
Number of page(s) 8
Section Multi-Axial, Variable and Complex Loadings
Published online 25 May 2018
  1. C. Baptista, thesis, EPFL, Lausanne (2016). [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Lotsberg, J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 131, 041302-041302–9 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Bokesjö, M. Al-Emrani, T. Svensson, Int. J. Fatigue. 44, 21–31 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. F. Hobbacher, Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C. R. A. Schneider, S. J. Maddox, 30 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  6. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-9: Fatigue (Comité européen de normalisation, Bruxelles, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  7. W. N. Findley, A theory for the effect of mean stress on fatigue of metals under combined torsion and axial load or bending (1958) [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Bruder, K. Störzel, J. Baumgartner, H. Hanselka, Int. J. Fatigue. 34, 86–102 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C. M. Sonsino, Int. J. Fatigue. 17, 55–70 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Radaj, C. M. Sonsino, W. Fricke, Fatigue assessment of welded joints by local approaches (2nd edition., 2006). [Google Scholar]
  11. R. E. Peterson, Proc SESA. 11, 199–206 (1950). [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Neuber, Theory of notch stresses: Principles for exact stress calculation (JW Edwards, 1946), vol. 74. [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Neuber, Kerbspannungslehre: Theorie der Spannungskonzentration Genaue Berechnung der Festigkeit (Springer-Verlag, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Neuber, Konstruktion. 20, 245–251 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Taylor, The theory of critical distances: a new perspective in fracture mechanics (Elsevier, Amsterdam; Boston, 2007). [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Olivier, V. B. Köttgen, T. Seeger, Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau FKM Frankf. Forschungsheft. 143 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Olivier, V. B. Köttgen, T. Seeger, Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau FKM FrankfurtMain Forschungsheft. 180 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  18. C. M. Sonsino, T. Bruder, J. Baumgartner, Weld. World. 54, R375–R392 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Dang-Van, in Advances in multiaxial fatigue (ASTM International, 1993). [Google Scholar]
  20. I. V. Papadopoulos, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 21, 269–285 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Papadopoulos IV, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 21, 269–285 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Karpanan, (ASME, 2016; [Google Scholar]
  23. M. M. Pedersen, Int. J. Fatigue. 83, 269–279 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Bruun, G. Härkegård, Int. J. Fatigue. 73, 1–16 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Fatemi, D. F. Socie, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 11, 149–165 (1988). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Amstutz, K. Störzel, T. Seeger, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 24, 357–368 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.