Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2018
12th International Fatigue Congress (FATIGUE 2018)
Article Number 14014
Number of page(s) 8
Section High Cycle Fatigue, Fatigue at Notches
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816514014
Published online 25 May 2018
  1. N.S. Tiedje, MST 26, 505-514 (2013). doi: 10.1179/026708310X12668415533649 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Costa, N. Machado, F.S. Silva, CTMAT 20, 120-128 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Endo, JSMS 38, 1139-1144 (1989). doi: 10.2472/jsms.38.1139 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Sofu, S. Okada, A. Sobota, AFS Transaction, 173-182 (1978) [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Siefer, K. Orths, Gießerei-Forschung 4, 3–7 (1969) [Google Scholar]
  6. W: Stets, A. Sobota, (AiF Nr. 13507 N/1) [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Löblich, (AiF Nr. 41 EN, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. U. de La Torre, A. Loizaga, J. Lacaze, J. Sertucha, MST 30, 1425-1431 (2013). doi: 10.1179/1743284713Y.0000000483 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M.H. El Haddad, T.H. Topper, K.N. Smith, EFM 11, 573-584 (1979). doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(79)90081-X [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Costa, N. Machado, F.S. Silva, Int. J. Fatigue 32, 988–995 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Lukas, L. Kunz, B. Weiss, R. Stickler, FFEMS 3, 195–204 (1980) [Google Scholar]
  12. M.R. Mitchell, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 99, 329 (1977). doi: 10.1115/1.3443549 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. F. de Kazinscky, J. Iron Steel Inst. 20, 851-855 (1970) [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Murakami, S. Nemat-Nasser, EFM 16, 373-386 (1982). doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(82)90115-1 [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Hill, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11 357-372 (1963). doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Llorca, C. González, J.M. Molina-Aldareguía, J. Segurado, R. Seltzer, F. Sket, M. Rodríguez, S. Sádaba, R. Muñoz, L.P. Canal, Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) 23, 130-147 (2011). doi: 10.1002/adma.201101683 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S.J. Hollister, N. Kikuchi. Comput. Mech. 10, 73–95 (1992). doi: 10.1007/BF00369853 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Melan, Der Spannungszustand eines Mises Henckyschen Kontinuums bei veränderlicher Belastung. (Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky; Akad. d. Wiss, Wien, Leipzig, 1938) [Google Scholar]
  19. J.W. Simon, D. Weichert, Comput. Mech. 49, 477–485 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s00466-011-0656-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. W.T. Koiter: KNAW 14-34 (1956) [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Andriollo, K. Hellström, M.R. Sonne, J. Thorborg, N. Tiedje, J. Hattel, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 111 333-357 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2017.11.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. S.K. Pradhan, B.B. Nayak, S.S. Sahay, B.K. Mishra, Carbon 47, 2290–2292 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.024 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. W. Yan, C.L. Pun, Z. Wu, G.P. Simon, Composites Part B: Engineering 42, 2093-2097 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D.O. Fernandino, A.P. Cisilino, S. Toro, P.J. Sanchez, Int. J. Fract 207, 1-26 (2017). doi: 10.1007/s10704-017-0215-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Dierickx, C. Verdu, A. Reynaud, R. Fougeres, Scripta Materialia 34, 261-268 (1996). doi: 10.1016/1359-6462(95)00496-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S.H. Pundale, R.J. Rogers, G.R. Nadkarni, AFS Transactions 106, 99-106 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Andriollo, J. Thorborg, N.S. Tiedje, J. Hattel, Mater. Sci. Eng. 84, 12-27 (2015). doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/84/1/012027 [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Andriollo, J. Hattel, Mech. Mat. 96, 138–150 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.02.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Andriollo, J. Thorborg, J. Hattel, Int. J. Solid. Struct. 100-101, 523–535 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.09.023 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Bonora, A. Ruggiero, Int. J. Solid. Struct. 42, 1401–1424 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.025 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. W. Brocks, S. Hao, D. Steglich, J. Phys. IV France 6, 43- 52 (1996). doi: 10.1051/jp4:1996605 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. M.J. Dong, G.K. Hu, A. Diboine, D. Moulin, C. Prioul, J. Phys. IV France 3, 643- 648 (1993). doi: 10.1051/jp4:19937103 [Google Scholar]
  33. F. Rabold, M. Kuna, Comput. Mat. Sci 32, 489–497 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.09.016 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. D.O. Fernandino, A.P. Cisilino, R.E. Boeri, Mech. Mat. 83, 110–121 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. F.D. Carazo, S.M. Giusti, A.D. Boccardo, L.A. Godoy, Comput. Mat. Sci. 82, 378–390 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.044 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. F. Carazo, S. Giusti, A. Boccardo, P. Dardati, L Godoy, Mec. Comput. 30, 611–629 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  37. V. Di Cocco, D. Iacoviello, F. Iacoviello, A. Rossi, Pro. Eng. 109, 135–143 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.223 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. F. Klubberg, P. Beiss, Effizienzsteig. d. innov. Werkstofft: Wkstfftag‘95, 777–780 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  39. Chen, G, Strength Prediction of Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites (Shaker, Aachen, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  40. G. Chen, A. Bezold, C. Broeckmann, Comp. Struct. 189, 330-339 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. P. Suquet, Elements of homogenization for inelastic solid mechanics (Universite des Sciences et Technique du Languedoc, 1985) [Google Scholar]
  42. O. Pierard, Micromechanics of inclusionreinforced composites in elastoplasticity and elasto-viscoplasticity: modeling and computation. (Universite Catholique de Louvain, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  43. J.A. König, Shakedown of elastic-plastic structures. Fundamental studies in engineering, 7 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987) [Google Scholar]
  44. A. François, H. Abdelkader, T. Le An, M. Said, P. Tao, J Glob Optim 37, 609–630 (2007). doi: 10.1007/s10898-006-9069-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. W. Bleck, Werkstoffkunde Stahl für Studium und Praxis (Mainz, Aachen, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  46. F. Klubberg, M. Hempen, H. Schäfer, P. Beiss, 7th Ams. Symp. Wrld. Dyn. Tes., 318-342 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  47. A. Velichko, F. Mücklich, PM 43, 192-207 (2006) doi: 10.3139/147.100297 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.